cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Front nose design and stability and gas mileage?

MookieKat
Explorer
Explorer
I am seeing that the newer nose design is rounded whereas the older ones are big and flat.

Has anyone hauled both types with the same TV and seen a difference in stability or gas mileage?
34 REPLIES 34

laknox
Nomad
Nomad
MookieKat wrote:
I am seeing that the newer nose design is rounded whereas the older ones are big and flat.

Has anyone hauled both types with the same TV and seen a difference in stability or gas mileage?


My low-profile, square-front Komfort, produces very noticeable turbulence, and can suck fairly heavy stuff right out of my truck bed. Anything, front or back, that reduces turbulence, increases aerodynamics, thus efficiency. I'd almost bet that I wouldn't see =any= decrease in mileage were I pulling a comparable-weight current rig that's 12-18" taller than my '04 Komfort.

Lyle
2022 GMC Sierra 3500 HD Denali Crew Cab 4x4 Duramax
B&W OEM Companion & Gooseneck Kit
2017 KZ Durango 1500 D277RLT
1936 John Deere Model A
International Flying Farmers 64 Year Member

Alley_Fox
Explorer
Explorer
We traded our Arctic Fox 24-5N (about 26', 7,500 lbs) for an AF 29 5T (31', 9,500+ lbs)with a rounded cap in June and my calculations appear to show an increase of about 1/2 to 3/4 MPG with the same TV, although we have only towed the new AF about 3000 miles vice about 24,000 for the old one. The 29 5T is at least 1 foot taller, 6" wider and, of course, heavier by about 2000#. I don't worry about fuel "economy", if I did, we probably wouldn't go anywhere with it. I don't know if that settles the issue for the OP, but I'm convinced of the advantages of an aero cap....
2012 Arctic Fox 29-5T
04.5 GMC Duramax SLT CCLB turbo brake Isspros
B&W Companion, Tekonsha, EFI Live by Rob Coddens, Ride Rite air
5th Airborne

wilber1
Explorer
Explorer
Trailer height will also have a lot to do with it. Every foot of added height adds 8 square feet of front to push through the air.
"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice" WSC

2011 RAM 3500 SRW
2015 Grand Design Reflection 303RLS

ken_white
Explorer
Explorer
Aerodynamic variables consist of much more than just the front nose shape plus mileage will vary drastically with varying average speed.

Bottom line, we don't purchase our campers based on fuel economy.

Just my $0.02...
2014 RAM C&C 3500, 4x4, Club Cab, Hauler Bed, DRW, Aisin, 3.73's, etc...

2013 DRV Tradition 360 RSS
LED Lighting
570W of ET Solar Panels
MorningStar MPPT 45
Wagan 1000W Elite Pro Inverter
Duracell EGC2 Batteries with 460 A-H Capacity

gmcsmoke
Explorer
Explorer
Fuel mileage while pulling a 5 ton box down the road. Ha ha

tegu69
Explorer
Explorer
I guess if you spend all your time in one campground and not drive much, the savings would be insignificant. I probably spend more time watching fuel mileage than most and I believe that aero is probably more important than weight on long trips like Interstate driving (talking couple thousand pounds). A friend of mine just traveled about 1000 miles to trade his small tt with a big flat front end on a Cougar 5er that weighs about 3000 lbs. more. He got about 2mpg more on the return trip with the 5er.

Peg_Leg
Explorer
Explorer
Any contouring of the front is bound to help reduce drag. The newer tapered corners were more for clearance on short bed trucks at first. Now they seem to be taking the aerodynamics into account.
2012 Chevy 3500HD Dually 4X4
Crew Cab long bed 6.0 gasser 4.10
2019 Open Range OF337RLS
Yamaha EF3000iSE
retired gadgetman

Bumpyroad
Explorer
Explorer
mileshuff wrote:
Vulcaneer wrote:
Contoured nose on front makes no difference in MPG, stability. It's only there for turning clearance when backing with a short bed truck. Or else for aesthics.


Many manufactures advertise on the merits of turning as well as wind drag. I just went from a 5,000lb flat front TT to a 9,000lb rounded front cap 5th wheel. MPG with the same TV is consistently better with the 5'er.


I would think that the 5er would naturally be more streamlined that dragging a brick with space between it and the truck.
bumpy

mileshuff
Explorer
Explorer
Vulcaneer wrote:
Contoured nose on front makes no difference in MPG, stability. It's only there for turning clearance when backing with a short bed truck. Or else for aesthics.


Many manufactures advertise on the merits of turning as well as wind drag. I just went from a 5,000lb flat front TT to a 9,000lb rounded front cap 5th wheel. MPG with the same TV is consistently better with the 5'er.
2014 Winnebago 26FWRKS 5th Wheel
2007.5 Dodge 2500 6.7L Diesel
2004 Dodge Durango Hemi 3.55 (Used to tow TT)

MookieKat
Explorer
Explorer
Yes...it seems to make sense and so I asked what it meant in the real world of towing.

All the used ones that we have seen so far had a rounded nose but we are going to see one today that has a flat front so I was wondering.....if we should take that into consideration.

mileshuff
Explorer
Explorer
newman fulltimer wrote:
i have a square nose and like the interior height and storage.the round nose if you arw tall you cannot walk all the way to front without ducking .


Have to know your floorplan to understand. I have a rounded front cap. I can walk anywhere in the front bedroom without ducking. Of course the very front has a headboard for the bed and the far front sides have closets and night stand tables. So I can't walk around the front of the bed but I've not been in a 5'er where you could.
2014 Winnebago 26FWRKS 5th Wheel
2007.5 Dodge 2500 6.7L Diesel
2004 Dodge Durango Hemi 3.55 (Used to tow TT)

john_b1
Explorer
Explorer
mdamerell wrote:
I was told a gentlemen who transports trailers for a living that he sees a 1-2 mpg increase with the new aerodynamics. I am pleased with the performance of mine but I have not pulled one of the old styles to give you a comparison. I can tell you that in bad weather my 5'r behaves better than my semi trailer.



Just in simple terms it is much easier to push a aero designed contour through the air than a brick! Just makes simple sense. Think of a snowplow v blade versus straight blade.same idea. Jb
2001 F 350 CC PSD 373 rear,auto
RBW X16 slider,Bedsaver,Prodigy,Fold A Cover,Pressure Pro!
2011 Crossroads Cruiser cf32mk Patriot edit. 5th wheel Fibreglass and all the goodies necessary,Dish,comfy loungers,and a nickel to spend,
Mr & Mrs and the PUP.

mdamerell
Explorer
Explorer
I was told a gentlemen who transports trailers for a living that he sees a 1-2 mpg increase with the new aerodynamics. I am pleased with the performance of mine but I have not pulled one of the old styles to give you a comparison. I can tell you that in bad weather my 5'r behaves better than my semi trailer.
2012 Sundance 3100RB w/Reese Goose Box
2004 Ford F350 6.0 L PSD, CC, DRW, long bed, B&W drop ball hitch, Firestone Ride-rite air bags.

Vulcaneer
Explorer
Explorer
Contoured nose on front makes no difference in MPG, stability. It's only there for turning clearance when backing with a short bed truck. Or else for aesthics.
'12 F350 SB, CC, SRW, 6.7 PSD, 3.55 RAR, 6 spd auto
2015 DRV 38RSS 'Traditions'
Pullrite Super Glide 18K

Retirement = It's all poops and giggles....UNTIL someone Giggles and Poops.

MookieKat
Explorer
Explorer
I meant the rounded nose in the front where it rolls down and around, shaped like a ball....where the roof line rolls down.