cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Hydraulic vs Electric Landing Gear

Halmfamily
Explorer
Explorer
We are looking at new fifth wheels, the Cardinal has hydraulic 6 point leveling system and the Jayco has 6 point electric leveling system. Our current unit has hydraulic front landing gear and I really like how fast it is.

My question, is one system better than the other? Is there any pros and cons? It's not a deal breaker for me as the wife will get the layout she wants. I just want quality

Thanks for your replies.
2008 GMC Sierra 3500 SLT DRW D/A 4x4 (Big All)
2006 Ford F350 PSD SRW King Ranch 4x4 (Henry) (Sold)
B&W Companion, 90 Aux Fuel Tank, Scan Gauge II, Curt f/m hitch, Swagman XC
2015 Forest River Sierra 360 PDEK
DW Diane, DS Michael, FB Draco and Sabian
29 REPLIES 29

goducks10
Explorer
Explorer
avvidclif1 wrote:
Bumpyroad wrote:
Ryanjb01 wrote:
Look at any piece of heavy equipment, they are all hydraulic. If electric was better(more durable) they would be electric. Fact is, they are not. Hydraulic is king for doing work.

As mentioned, electric is less expensive. You get what you pay for.


using your logic, shouldn't all RVs be diesel then?
bumpy


Most if not all of the higher end ones are.


Thats why they're higher end.

waltbennett
Explorer
Explorer
Halmfamily wrote:
We are looking at new fifth wheels, the Cardinal has hydraulic 6 point leveling system and the Jayco has 6 point electric leveling system. Our current unit has hydraulic front landing gear and I really like how fast it is.

My question, is one system better than the other? Is there any pros and cons? It's not a deal breaker for me as the wife will get the layout she wants. I just want quality

Thanks for your replies.


We've electric, but have camped with a lot of folks with hydraulic. The hydraulic ones are very quick to set up and take down, but can be frustrating when the electronics don't want to cooperate. Doesn't happen often, but when it does it'll take time. There is less movement after setting up, but it's about the same as after we've tightened up our Strong Arms (that's a 4 point Level Up comparison, I'd imagine putting a pair of alum. screw jacks under the middle would equal a 6 point).

Bottom line, I'd go for it as you'll spend less time pushing buttons overall - just be prepared for the infrequent time when you've got to go manual or reboot the thing. Kind of like having a PC in your life!
'06 F350 TD, Softopper, airbags, AeroShield, coolant filter
'10 3665RE Hickory edition, wetbolts, Firestone LTs, Trimetric Battery Monitor, 4x100w panels & Morningstar TS-45, still tweeking.

john_bet
Explorer II
Explorer II
I can trouble shoot electric actuator and disconnect it faster than a hydraulic unit with less mess. Then if need be back to the old fashion way of leveling. And yes I have had one of my current front electric legs shear a pin while out on the road. I dealt with it and went on home. Repaired when I got home.
2018 Ram 3500 SRW CC LB 6.7L Cummins Auto 3.42 gears
2018 Grand Design 337RLS

laknox
Nomad
Nomad
Ryanjb01 wrote:
Look at any piece of heavy equipment, they are all hydraulic. If electric was better(more durable) they would be electric. Fact is, they are not. Hydraulic is king for doing work.

As mentioned, electric is less expensive. You get what you pay for.


Nope. It's because if electrics were used, you end up with something that looked like a steam shovel, with motors and cables all over. Hydraulics are much more compact and act directly on what needs to be moved.

Lyle
2022 GMC Sierra 3500 HD Denali Crew Cab 4x4 Duramax
B&W OEM Companion & Gooseneck Kit
2017 KZ Durango 1500 D277RLT
1936 John Deere Model A
International Flying Farmers 64 Year Member

avvidclif1
Explorer
Explorer
Bumpyroad wrote:
Ryanjb01 wrote:
Look at any piece of heavy equipment, they are all hydraulic. If electric was better(more durable) they would be electric. Fact is, they are not. Hydraulic is king for doing work.

As mentioned, electric is less expensive. You get what you pay for.


using your logic, shouldn't all RVs be diesel then?
bumpy


Most if not all of the higher end ones are.
Clif & Millie
2009 Ford F350 SRW CC Lariat 6.4 Diesel
2015 Heartland Cyclone HD CY3418 Toy Hauler

RustyJC
Explorer
Explorer
Electric systems have their Achilles heel in the gear reduction gearboxes. Break a gear and you're out of business.

I've had electric and hydraulic, and I'll go with hydraulic every time.

Rusty
2014.5 DRV Mobile Suites 38RSSA #6972

2016 Ram 3500 Dually Longhorn Crew Cab Long Bed, 4x4, 385/900 Cummins, Aisin AS69RC, 4.10, 39K+ GCWR, 30K+ trailer tow rating, 14K GVWR

B&W RVK3600

Bumpyroad
Explorer
Explorer
Ryanjb01 wrote:
Look at any piece of heavy equipment, they are all hydraulic. If electric was better(more durable) they would be electric. Fact is, they are not. Hydraulic is king for doing work.

As mentioned, electric is less expensive. You get what you pay for.


using your logic, shouldn't all RVs be diesel then?
bumpy

Ryanjb01
Explorer
Explorer
Look at any piece of heavy equipment, they are all hydraulic. If electric was better(more durable) they would be electric. Fact is, they are not. Hydraulic is king for doing work.

As mentioned, electric is less expensive. You get what you pay for.
2018 GMC 3500 Denali Crew Cab Dually Duramax/Allison 🙂
2015 Cedar Creek Silverback 35QB4
Ryan, Marsha, Alyssa and Emily

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work" ~ Thomas Edison

avvidclif1
Explorer
Explorer
j2catfish wrote:
Bumpyroad wrote:
j2catfish wrote:
Had both, really like hydraulic better. My old electric front jacks were over loaded from the factory so I bought a second motor and wired it so that the front jacks could be controlled by themselves. (Removed the cross over bar).


WAS THIS an electric jack issue or a construction/design issue?
bumpy


I'd say a design problem, but I could have overloaded the front compartment. Some people have been known to do that! The original motor might have been marginal because the problem went away when I added the second motor and gear box. YMMV.
Catfish


The front cylinders on the Lippert 6 point are rated for 12k lbs EA. I don't think you could overload them. The other 4 are smaller at 8k EA. That's why you can lift the entire RV, 56k lbs of lift.
Clif & Millie
2009 Ford F350 SRW CC Lariat 6.4 Diesel
2015 Heartland Cyclone HD CY3418 Toy Hauler

DSteiner51
Explorer
Explorer
j2catfish wrote:
Bumpyroad wrote:
j2catfish wrote:
Had both, really like hydraulic better. My old electric front jacks were over loaded from the factory so I bought a second motor and wired it so that the front jacks could be controlled by themselves. (Removed the cross over bar).


WAS THIS an electric jack issue or a construction/design issue?
bumpy


I'd say a design problem, but I could have overloaded the front compartment. Some people have been known to do that! The original motor might have been marginal because the problem went away when I added the second motor and gear box. YMMV.
Catfish


World of difference... front landing gear on one motor or leveling system. The only thing in common is electric.

Electric system... computer computes and sends power directly to individual jacks. Pro: less to go wrong? Con: mice?
Hydraulic system... computer computes and send signal to solenoids to operate pump and valves to send hydraulic fluid to individual jacks. Pro: More robust? Cons: mice?
D. Steiner
The sooner I fall behind, the more time I have to catch up.

tinner12002
Explorer
Explorer
Bumpyroad wrote:
yep, my automatic hydraulic system was great, until it wasn't.
bumpy


And so it would be with electric until it isn't, they are all great when they are working properly. If you have issues with any I'm sure its a pain though I do believe a hyd cylinder would be cheaper to replace if necessary than an electric one. Plus the hyd is much faster!
2015 Ram 3500/DRW/Aisin/auto/Max tow/4.10s,Cummins, stock Laramie Limited--Silver
Tequila Sunrise 2012 Ultra Classic Limited
2018 Raptor 428SP

DSteiner51
Explorer
Explorer
The thread heading says landing gear then asks about 6 point leveling system. Which is it? Many older electric landing gear had one motor/gearbox for the landing gear while the new leveling systems use individual motor/gearbox for each jack.

My auto level system is electric and works great. The length of time for it to level depends on how far off it is when I push the auto level button. Sometimes it seems it takes a bit for the computer to figure out what is what and then soft dirt will make it rethink also. On concrete or hard surface usually by the time I get the power cord out and hooked up it is done leveling. Soft dirt or way out of level I may beat it.

I never have to worry about leak down of the hydraulics, no oil leaks, no stuck valves, no bad hose ends or hoses and since usually only one jack operates once jacks hit the ground I'm gonna guess less load on the battery at any one time.

I've just had mine a year and only used it maybe 15-20 times but it makes me smile every time I push the auto level button then remove the power cord and water hose to do my part while it does it's magic. Ultimately either system should work well, buy the trailer you really want and take the system it comes with. You will smile either way.
D. Steiner
The sooner I fall behind, the more time I have to catch up.

Bumpyroad
Explorer
Explorer
Racine96 wrote:
My dealer guy says hydraulic are better but also more expensive.


more expensive, that means the dealer makes more $$ if he sells them?
bumpy

Racine96
Explorer
Explorer
My dealer guy says hydraulic are better but also more expensive.