โOct-12-2015 04:31 PM
โOct-25-2015 04:59 PM
Campinfan wrote:
Are you saying you would not like to try it because it would pivot at the hitch on the bumper, therefore being like a double tow? If so, and I am not expert on this, but from what I have seen about these before is they attach at three points on the back of your truck so it moves straight..sort of like having a longer bed or at least a longer wheelbase.
If it does pivot, then I may have to agree with you because I have never double towed nor do I think I want to.
โOct-25-2015 05:33 AM
โOct-24-2015 07:24 PM
โOct-22-2015 04:31 AM
majorgator wrote:
I could agree that the outer arms on the Automated Safety Hitch provide a certain amount of sway control between the truck and the hitch. However, I do not understand how they can provide weight distribution (in the sense relative to RV's) with only the latching system.
Either way, if your truck is rated to tow, say, 14,000 pounds MAX from the "conventional" position, then that's the limiting factor. It doesn't matter how you shift the weight around. And while it is helpful to have another braking axle, the truck braking is designed (theoretically) for the weight of the truck and max payload. Trailers of this class being talked about for this hitch should have sufficient braking on their own axles.
โOct-21-2015 08:29 PM
โOct-15-2015 11:51 AM
โOct-15-2015 07:34 AM
06Fargo wrote:
Thanks Lyle. Yes - when we tow using our hitch extension (with the truck camper loaded) the ball is 36in back of the truck receiver - a 16ft tandem cargo trailer almost tracks in the truck's tracks around the parking lot.
The "Mr Truck review" video shows how the unit couples to the tow vehicle - draft loads are transferred at the end of frame couplers. The center receiver has a V shape alignment fitting.
Lots of interesting well thought out features...
โOct-15-2015 04:08 AM
โOct-14-2015 09:55 PM
โOct-14-2015 06:00 PM
majorgator wrote:06Fargo wrote:majorgator wrote:06Fargo wrote:
I would guess the factory receiver would be subject to 1/3 of the trailer weight in a 3 point connection system?
If it were a 3-point connection system with weight bearing properties, you would be correct. However, the other 2 connection points of this system aren't built to handle any loads other than the lateral forces exerted in a turn.
I'll further note that my understanding the design of this system is based purely on the information given on their website. If the other connection points are meant for load bearing, I don't see any mention of it on the site.
I should have said 1/3 of the drawbar pull not trailer weight. The design appears to transfer very little weight to the tow vehicle.
I would agree that it transfers very little tongue weight, which is probably one of the best aspects of the unit. However, it doesn't offset the total "tow weight". If the RV plus the hitch weighs 15,000 pounds, then that's how much tow weight that's exerted onto the vehicle.
โOct-14-2015 01:16 PM
06Fargo wrote:majorgator wrote:06Fargo wrote:
I would guess the factory receiver would be subject to 1/3 of the trailer weight in a 3 point connection system?
If it were a 3-point connection system with weight bearing properties, you would be correct. However, the other 2 connection points of this system aren't built to handle any loads other than the lateral forces exerted in a turn.
I'll further note that my understanding the design of this system is based purely on the information given on their website. If the other connection points are meant for load bearing, I don't see any mention of it on the site.
I should have said 1/3 of the drawbar pull not trailer weight. The design appears to transfer very little weight to the tow vehicle.
โOct-14-2015 01:07 PM
justafordguy wrote:
What happens with this hitch when backing up? Seems like it would be odd.
โOct-14-2015 12:58 PM
majorgator wrote:06Fargo wrote:
I would guess the factory receiver would be subject to 1/3 of the trailer weight in a 3 point connection system?
If it were a 3-point connection system with weight bearing properties, you would be correct. However, the other 2 connection points of this system aren't built to handle any loads other than the lateral forces exerted in a turn.
I'll further note that my understanding the design of this system is based purely on the information given on their website. If the other connection points are meant for load bearing, I don't see any mention of it on the site.
โOct-14-2015 12:06 PM