โJul-21-2013 07:01 AM
โJul-21-2013 07:26 PM
wny_pat wrote:Don McL wrote:I've seen convential Class 8's look every bit as bad as that diesel pusher on top. Saw one where the windshield dropped down and slipped backwards right across where the drivers neck should have been and it went right into the sleeper and cut thru the back of it. It was a good thing he dropped sideways across to the other seat, or he would not be be talking about it today.
โJul-21-2013 05:34 PM
โJul-21-2013 05:17 PM
Don McL wrote:I've seen convential Class 8's look every bit as bad as that diesel pusher on top. Saw one where the windshield dropped down and slipped backwards right across where the drivers neck should have been and it went right into the sleeper and cut thru the back of it. It was a good thing he dropped sideways across to the other seat, or he would not be be talking about it today.
โJul-21-2013 05:03 PM
Rick Jay wrote:
GENECOP, you're drinking the government Kool-Aid in believing that just because they (NHTSA) says something, it must be true.
My class A has steel C beams which are just about head-level for anyone riding in a car or van. I'll take those beams and an extra 10,000 lbs. of weight travelling in my direction over airbags & crumple zones. ๐ You don't have to be a rocket scientist, but having a fundamental understanding of physics helps. ๐
Crashing into a wall, maybe the C would be better, maybe not. But the majority of those collisions are due to driver in-attentiveness. I know my abilities and will take my chances there. But in a collision with another vehicle of which I have no control over, mass is your friend. You want as much mass heading in your direction as possible. Simple conservation of momentum. But shhhhhhhhh! Don't tell NHTSA we know that. ๐ Their tests are fine, as long as you run into a wall or a smaller vehicle. By the way, does NHTSA test how well the cab of that class C holds up when 10,000 lbs. of RV pushes forward into it from the back? Just wondering? And I'm not sure if those crumple zones up front are also designed to perform optimally under that extra weight. I thought the tests were done on the standard van chassis, which is much lighter than the majority of RVs on the road.
But if they're so much better, in your opinion, why is it that no crash data exists to substantiate that claim? I can't say for certain my A is safer either because no data is available to substantiate that. So, until such data is available, you have your opinion, and I have mine. Just don't state it as "fact". It's not.
As for service, I still don't see what would be easier for me to service on a C than my A. My A is as easy to work on as our cars for routine stuff. In fact, because it's higher off the ground, it's actually easier to do a lot of things underneath 'cause I can just crawl under without even jacking it up.
~Rick
โJul-21-2013 03:55 PM
rvhappy2010 wrote:Exactly why we went from a Class C to a Class A. Smart A** must have something up stairs! When your ready to move from Class A gas to DP, please come back and ask why Smart A** is wrong again. After we went to Class A gas, we went to a Diesel Pusher. No reason to look back, best move we ever made.
Hey all.
however smart a.. Suggested we look at older class A motorhome s because they have better suspension, towing, and overall features.
I know this is like comparing apples and oranges, but feel free to throw in your two grapes worth and we can make a fruit salad.
โJul-21-2013 03:44 PM
โJul-21-2013 02:18 PM
โJul-21-2013 01:56 PM
โJul-21-2013 01:27 PM
โJul-21-2013 12:57 PM
โJul-21-2013 12:53 PM
Rick Jay wrote:GENECOP wrote:
Class C safer to drive and easier to service...
Do you have any statistics to support the "safer to drive" comment? I see it posted here a lot, but I personally differ with that opinion.
Easier to service...depends. It's probably easier to get others to service a C than an A, but I do my own service and so far routine service has been pretty straightforward on my gasser A.
rvhappy2010, don't rule out anything. Take your time and do your research. It took us about 2+ years of research to realize that our best solution was the class A gasser in our signature. We started out looking at small hybrids to tow behind our minivan and ended up with the class A and tow our minivan behind it! ๐ Nine years later we're still very happy with our purchase. Floor plan is probably one of the key factors. We had 4 children and the "conventional wisdom" was that "A's are for couples, C's are for families". We decided not to follow stereotypes and are very glad we didn't. For us, our dual slide, dual sofa layout is perfect. It gives us plenty of living space and the storage space and capacity to carry want we need for extended trips.
Don't rush, and feel free to ask many questions here. It's the comments and experience of the members here which allowed us to make the right decision the first time.
Good Luck,
~Rick
โJul-21-2013 12:40 PM
โJul-21-2013 10:26 AM
GENECOP wrote:
Class C safer to drive and easier to service...
โJul-21-2013 09:41 AM
rvhappy2010 wrote:
Hey all.
This might be long. My brother is a big bus coach conversion guy who thinks he know everything, but since he has lots of money to make mistakes he's ahead of the pack.
We are looking to enter the motorhome group and we have always been looking at a class c, however smart a.. Suggested we look at older class A motorhome s because they have better suspension, towing, and overall features.
I know this is like comparing apples and oranges, but feel free to throw in your two grapes worth and we can make a fruit salad.
โJul-21-2013 09:32 AM