โOct-10-2017 07:43 AM
โOct-10-2017 10:09 PM
โOct-10-2017 07:07 PM
GordonThree wrote:dryfly wrote:
I am considering build a Virtual Private Network for remote security camera viewing. I don't want to do basic port forwarding for security reasons.
I have found that VPN's can be hardware such as in the router, software in the computer, or through VPN service providers. As far as I can determine these providers act between a LAN and the ISP.
Question: which would be the most advantageous, and most economical?
VPN endpoint built into a residential router is fine for this purpose. A cloud based VPN provider would make this more complicated. I like DD-WRT based routers, like Linksys, Buffalo, Asus.
You setup your router to accept VPN connections, and then setup your cell phone, tablet, laptop, etc to "dial in" to that VPN.
Once connected, your device is now part of your home network, and can access the cameras and whatever else you have networked back home.
The only difference between a cheap residential router and an expensive commercial unit is the level of support and frequency of updates. They run the exact same VPN software named OpenSSL / OpenVPN. While a $$$$ router might get security updates every few months, a $$ router will likely never get security updates unless something embarrasses the company into a knee-jerk reaction.
โOct-10-2017 04:20 PM
โOct-10-2017 03:18 PM
dryfly wrote:Mortimer Brewster wrote:
I do have to reset the connection once or twice a day when it loses connectivity. Hope this helps.
Is this normal with PIA? If so, that would rule it out for me, as my objective is remote access. I could not do resets effectively.
โOct-10-2017 01:17 PM
GordonThree wrote:Indeed. I (and my empoloyer) use Dyn.com There are other ways you can do this, however a dynamic IP to hostname service is certainly the easiest.magicbus wrote:GordonThree wrote:Seems like this would require a fixed IP address to your home network wouldn't it?
VPN endpoint built into a residential router is fine for this purpose. A cloud based VPN provider would make this more complicated. I like DD-WRT based routers, like Linksys, Buffalo, Asus.
You setup your router to accept VPN connections, and then setup your cell phone, tablet, laptop, etc to "dial in" to that VPN.
Once connected, your device is now part of your home network, and can access the cameras and whatever else you have networked back home.
Dave
Not really. Depending on your provider, the IP may not change often (mine hasn't in years). If it does, services like Dyn.com, Noip.com, etc can help keep track. Most mid to high end residential routers have the built in ability to update such services.
โOct-10-2017 12:24 PM
magicbus wrote:GordonThree wrote:Seems like this would require a fixed IP address to your home network wouldn't it?
VPN endpoint built into a residential router is fine for this purpose. A cloud based VPN provider would make this more complicated. I like DD-WRT based routers, like Linksys, Buffalo, Asus.
You setup your router to accept VPN connections, and then setup your cell phone, tablet, laptop, etc to "dial in" to that VPN.
Once connected, your device is now part of your home network, and can access the cameras and whatever else you have networked back home.
Dave
โOct-10-2017 12:04 PM
GordonThree wrote:Seems like this would require a fixed IP address to your home network wouldn't it?
VPN endpoint built into a residential router is fine for this purpose. A cloud based VPN provider would make this more complicated. I like DD-WRT based routers, like Linksys, Buffalo, Asus.
You setup your router to accept VPN connections, and then setup your cell phone, tablet, laptop, etc to "dial in" to that VPN.
Once connected, your device is now part of your home network, and can access the cameras and whatever else you have networked back home.
โOct-10-2017 11:46 AM
dryfly wrote:
I am considering build a Virtual Private Network for remote security camera viewing. I don't want to do basic port forwarding for security reasons.
I have found that VPN's can be hardware such as in the router, software in the computer, or through VPN service providers. As far as I can determine these providers act between a LAN and the ISP.
Question: which would be the most advantageous, and most economical?
โOct-10-2017 11:40 AM
braindead0 wrote:
I am an expert. First off you have to understand that VPN doesn't mean much without knowing the points the virtual private network is connecting. VPN services are designed to secure your browsing, not connect you to your home network and will provide no help with accessing your local security cameras (which I believe is what you want to do).
โOct-10-2017 11:03 AM
โOct-10-2017 10:39 AM
Mortimer Brewster wrote:
I do have to reset the connection once or twice a day when it loses connectivity. Hope this helps.
โOct-10-2017 10:09 AM
โOct-10-2017 10:08 AM