โJan-13-2015 03:47 PM
โJan-25-2015 07:45 AM
โJan-20-2015 08:09 AM
โJan-18-2015 06:10 PM
LANShark42 wrote:
Again, I'd like to thank everyone for their input. Yesterday, I purchased a 2015 Ford, F250XLT, 4WD, 6.2l gas V8, crew cab. Drove it to Patti's 1880's Settlement in Grand Rivers KY for dinner last night (125 miles or so one way). Couldn't be happier with the way it drives and rides. Had 2 6'+ gentlemen (son and nephew) in the back seat and they were comfortable too.
โJan-18-2015 05:16 PM
LANShark42 wrote:
Again, I'd like to thank everyone for their input. Yesterday, I purchased a 2015 Ford, F250XLT, 4WD, 6.2l gas V8, crew cab. Drove it to Patti's 1880's Settlement in Grand Rivers KY for dinner last night (125 miles or so one way). Couldn't be happier with the way it drives and rides. Had 2 6'+ gentlemen (son and nephew) in the back seat and they were comfortable too.
โJan-18-2015 12:43 PM
โJan-18-2015 09:34 AM
GoPackGo wrote:
Patti's - What a great place. Hope you got pie !!!
โJan-18-2015 09:23 AM
โJan-18-2015 08:06 AM
โJan-17-2015 06:00 PM
โJan-17-2015 05:11 PM
LANShark42 wrote:
First, I'd like to thank everyone for weighing in. To try to answer questions or comments:
I DO have a Stihl chainsaw. I like to buy good stuff. Problem is, I don't think I can afford top end in this case. I can't spend $50k on a TV, even though it will be my daily driver. For those familiar with Indiana, we are in the extreme SW part of the state, near the Ohio river. The Ohio really modifies out weather. We don't get near the snow cities an hour north of us get, much less Indy or farther north. But I've had 4WD in the past and enjoy the peace of mind it gives me that if/when we DO get snow, I can go pretty well anywhere I need to. Doubt that we'll camp in the snow, but I know better than to say "never". I like the though of being able to back up a slick incline without worrying about it.
Someone asked how I got the tongue weight. I copied it straight from the manufacturer's website. As for make - I have a slight preference for the F350 because I previously owned an F150 I was VERY happy with. But I'm really looking hard at the cost on this one. Cheapest truck with adequate features will likely take this one.
Thanks again for all your help!
โJan-17-2015 01:21 PM
GoPackGo wrote:
I think that if you need a 3/4 ton truck (or larger) to safely tow your rig then it doesn't matter if it takes a few more feet to stop when you're not towing. The grey matter between your ears should tell you when to apply the brakes so you don't hit that van in front of you.
Tim
โJan-16-2015 10:25 PM
โJan-16-2015 07:18 PM
valhalla360 wrote:Speedogomer wrote:valhalla360 wrote:Speedogomer wrote:valhalla360 wrote:Speedogomer wrote:
Another thing to think about, if your truck is your daily driver, is how well it works as a daily driver.
As a daily driver a 3/4 and 1 ton are worse in nearly every single way compared to a half ton. They're bigger, less fuel efficent, they ride significantly worse, are harder to park, and have slower acceleration and longer braking when unloaded. While they may be better the 10 days a year that you tow, they will be worse the other 355 days. Technically because of the increase in stopping distance and decrease in acceleration, a 3/4 or 1 ton truck is less likely to avoid an accident that you may have been able to avoid in a half ton. Similarly equipped trucks, a 3/4 takes 10-15 ft longer to stop from 60 mph. So they're safer 10 days a year, and less safe the other 355 days.
Ride in both and compare. My Hemi Ram 1500 rides great, my cousins hemi ram 2500 rides horrible.
No question, if you're buying a vehicle just to tow, the 3/4 or 1 ton is hands down the better choice. It's not as easy to argue if it's meant to be daily driven.
Other than a stiffer ride almost none of those downsides are real.
Fuel efficency with a big engine is lousy in both. The overall length and turning ability are not significantly different (assumes same cab and bed configuration). With the big engines, the both have good acceleration when not towing and the heavier duty trucks have larger brakes.
Yes they have larger brakes but the trucks themselves are much heavier, their stopping distances are increased, check out the #'s on them. You'll find across the board farther stopping distances.
Even with larger engines, they are slower to accelerate, again check out the #'s....and that's if they have the diesel option. Ram and Chevy both have less powerful gas engines in their 2500 than they do their 1500s. Which puts their gas equivalent even slower yet.
Most people on this forum are quick to reccomend a one ton to to someone as a daily driver. That person may tow only a handful of days a year. That one ton has a lower crash rating, worse ride, harder to park, higher maintenance and registration fees, worse fuel economy, ect ect.
Yes they're awesome if they're dedicated for towing. Daily driving one just isn't as practical as a half ton, and even they are a compromise compared to many other vehicles.
You appear focused on the ego points. If you are taking them out to a track day, I would agree there is a slight edge for the 1/2 ton (even better for a small PU by the way) but since the vast majority of people don't race thier tow vehicles the point is the numbers are really very similar.
The standard V8 has plenty of power to get them moving at a brisk pace when empty. I don't think I've ever felt the need to put the pedal more than 1/2way down when not towing in the 3/4tons I've owned and yet that has always been plenty of power to get up to speed. Fuel efficency with similar power packages are about the same. Braking isn't much different as your charts show (less than 10% variation).
Having driven both over the years, the one noticable difference is the ride is much stiffer. If you are sensitive, it might bother you.
The other possible edge though not as much as it used to be is 1/2 tons used to sit lower to the ground making them easier to get in and out of. More recently it seems the 1/2 ton trucks sit higher apparently to look more like the bigger trucks.
A minor point of interest: In the one graph, the Chevy and GMC have different results. As everyone knows, the only difference between the trucks is the badges. That leads me to believe that they did not ensure the tests were between equivilently outfitted trucks or the test has significant variability that isn't being accounted for.
If you read the test the GMC and Chevy had different tires and slightly different options, giving them different weights and braking. Which would account for the difference. So no, the difference is not just badges.
No ego, just facts. Safety is a big issue for me. If youre daily driving, the smallest truck that can safely (key word safely) do the job may be safer the rest of the year. I see accidents all the time that 10ft is the difference between an accident and no accident. Sure real world is different than a track test, but regardless a 3/4 takes longer to stop on a track and in the real world. Also non-track related, some 3/4 models have lower crash test rating than their half ton counterparts.
So in other words, they aren't comparing trucks that are outfitted identically so there is no reason to believe they are comparing apples to apples when looking between 1/2 ton vs 3/4 ton trucks and the graphs are thus meaningless.
Even so, far too much variability shown to suggest a meaninful conclusion.
โJan-16-2015 12:22 PM
Turtle n Peeps wrote:
For me it's simple. If you go off road a lot or live where it snows a lot get a 4x. If you don't.............well.......don't. ๐