โJul-17-2013 04:56 PM
โJul-24-2013 02:12 PM
dturm wrote:Thanks Doc. I think the same way! As long as she eats and avoids pancreatitis, it's all good! So far it's been about a year with no further issue :Bchele wrote:
I wish that article provided the recipes! I've been feeding our dogs home made food. Skeeter has pancreatitis so she is on a fat-free diet. The girls look good, seem healthy, but it would be nice to know if I'm doing this right!
I'm not sure I'd worry about nutritional complete in a dog with a medical problem, like pancreatitis. Short term, no problem at all, mid term probably not an issue - long term (I'm talking years) you need to weigh potential issues from diet vs the real problem of pancreatitis.
Just my $.02
โJul-20-2013 02:48 AM
Code2High wrote:
As far as the nutritional aspect, dogs don't have a built-in requirement to have an exact amount of vitamins and minerals at every meal, any more than people do. What makes "complete and balanced" so critical is that so often we feed them the same thing every single day for years at a time. So, that diet has to cover all the bases, or problems will result. Some people who feed holistically rotate ingredients in the diet in order to balance it out over time. Honestly, that's healthier, but not everyone is going to do that. Or even can do that, especially with animals with specific dietary restrictions or needs.
If you look at the back of any dog (or cat) food, you're going to see a list of ingredients. It will start out as either meats or grains or whatever the "macro nutrient" ingredients are that provide the protein, carbs, and fat. Then there's a long list of supplements. Basically, the way the food becomes "complete" is that they add the equivalent of multi-vitamin and mineral supplements to it. The only problem with that is that when you stop and think about it, they consistently, as a group, over-estimate the amount of food a dog of a given size needs to stay at a healthy weight. So, most dogs are getting half of the food they suggest and thus getting half the amount of vitamins and minerals that the company says they should get for their size. Oops.
โJul-19-2013 11:21 PM
โJul-19-2013 07:25 PM
chele wrote:
I wish that article provided the recipes! I've been feeding our dogs home made food. Skeeter has pancreatitis so she is on a fat-free diet. The girls look good, seem healthy, but it would be nice to know if I'm doing this right!
โJul-19-2013 05:03 PM
โJul-19-2013 03:14 PM
โJul-19-2013 09:29 AM
โJul-19-2013 09:18 AM
โJul-19-2013 08:09 AM
BCSnob wrote:Deb and Ed M wrote:From what I can tell from the scientific literature, the answer is yes for healthy dogs. The answer is likely no for dogs that have compromised health.
BC Snob - how do they manage to eat this stuff and not get deathly sick????? Are their systems just better-designed to deal with the pathogens they surely ingest??
The issue we're seeing in the press for raw pet foods (all pets foods) has to do with public (human) health concerns associated with the pathogens that are likely present in the raw meats (and pet foods being recalled). In other words, possible human sickness due to contact with contaminated pet foods.
AVMA Position Statement wrote:
Animal-source proteins of concern include beef, pork, poultry, fish, and other meat from domesticated or wild animals as well as milk* and eggs. Several studies1โ6 reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals have demonstrated that raw or undercooked animal-source protein may be contaminated with a variety of pathogenic organisms, including Salmonella spp, Campylobacter spp, Clostridium spp, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus. Cats and dogs may develop foodborne illness after being fed animal-source protein contaminated with these organisms if adequate steps are not taken to eliminate pathogens; secondary transmission of these pathogens to humans (eg, pet owners) has also been reported.1,4 Cats and dogs can develop subclinical infections with these organisms but still pose a risk to livestock, other nonhuman animals, and humans, especially children, older persons, and immunocompromised individuals.
โJul-19-2013 07:58 AM
Deb and Ed M wrote:From what I can tell from the scientific literature, the answer is yes for healthy dogs. The answer is likely no for dogs that have compromised health.
BC Snob - how do they manage to eat this stuff and not get deathly sick????? Are their systems just better-designed to deal with the pathogens they surely ingest??
โJul-19-2013 07:48 AM
โJul-19-2013 06:02 AM
โJul-19-2013 05:27 AM
WandaLust2 wrote:Pawz4me wrote:
If I were going to prepare my own dog food, I would educate myself extensively first. Two reputable sources of information IMO are:
Monica Segal (K9 Kitchen, as BCSnob mentioned above) and
Sabine Contreras
Exactly! Just buying a sack of raw meat and a supplement wouldn't be wise. But any of the good recipes out there (by Lic vets/nutritionists) are an improvement over the commercial kibbles. As for being cautious with raw meat... well aren't we all unless we're vegetarians? My husband and myself always wash our hands thoroughly after handling raw meat we cook for dinner.
โJul-19-2013 03:21 AM
Deb and Ed M wrote:
LOL!! I kept looking for the directions where it said "brown the ground beef" or bake it or whatever - when I realized they were talking about feeding raw hamburger - it gave me the heebie-jeebies ๐ The recalls on THAT stuff make the dog food recalls pale in comparison....