โFeb-07-2012 01:34 PM
โFeb-19-2012 07:02 AM
daamac wrote:Better suited, who knows? Not for me I know. Apparently though as I found out, they are not designed to hit pot holes ๐
True or not?
โFeb-19-2012 05:53 AM
daamac wrote:
When you read comments on forums such as this about switching from an ST to an LT tire, one of the things you read is that ST tires are designed to better withstand the stresses created when turning a dual axle trailer - that this design in some way makes ST tires more suited for dual axle trailer use than LT tires.
True or not?
โFeb-19-2012 05:47 AM
โFeb-19-2012 05:41 AM
โFeb-19-2012 04:49 AM
(snip)
Well, at least when used for the "light truck" application intended by the manufacturer. Frankly , I'm surprised when I hear that any tire mfr. would honor an LT warranty if the tires are placed on a trailer- a use for which most LT's are NOT designed/marketed.
Michelinยฎ XPS Ribยฎ tires are the best value per mile in the Michelin commercial tire lineup and an ideal choice for commercial trailers because of low rolling resistance (for better fuel economy), a long-wear tread design and retreadability. These tires also have the strength of a reinforced all-steel construction for lasting durability.
Responsive handling helps you negotiate through tough traffic
Greater durability and puncture
resistance from a third steel belt.
Easily retreadable all-steel casing
Lowest cost per mile in this category
Resists sidewall damage with the sculptured sidewall protector.
Sidewall: black serrated
outline lettering.
Load Range: E
Service Description: 120/116Q
โFeb-19-2012 04:43 AM
FastEagle wrote:
No matter the type or design tire used on our trailers, they still have to have the proper air pressure to operate within itโs advertised parameters. According to a NHTSA survey, under inflation is the most abused condition found when inspecting tires used on our highways.
So letโs ask the engineers some questions. Iโll kick it off with these.What is the origin of the load inflation charts found on the internet from various tire manufacturers?....
FastEagle wrote:
... Are they written for the public at large to apply them as they see fit?........
FastEagle wrote:
........Or, are they essentially provided as a tool for vehicle manufacturers and tire installers?.......
FastEagle wrote:
.......We see lots of information about getting our trailerโs to the scales and getting each tire position weighed. Then we are told to air the tires to the highest weight on each axle as long as itโs within the tires operating parameters. Isnโt that being counter productive? Doing that provides zero load capacity reserves for the heavy tire. Besides that, the procedure may not apply to all trailers because, we are already told by the vehicle manufacturer to air our tires to the maximum allowed via the tire placard.
FastEagle
โFeb-19-2012 04:35 AM
โFeb-19-2012 12:49 AM
FastEagle wrote:Chris wrote:
FE we all read about G614's failing. However we have not read about a RIB or R250 failing in trailer service, so please post a link to issues with either! Or get over it, once and for all. Or maybe try a set yourself! It is really time for you to put up or ........... Chris
They donโt have a documented track record. Who would dare post a failure in this forum after bragging how well they worked for awhile. Go to Michelinโs truck tire maintenance manual. They have pictures of failed steel cased tires.
FE
โFeb-18-2012 09:05 PM
Tireman9 wrote:
Sorry there is no simple answer because there are a number of components that are different for different reasons between the two type tires. Of the 20 - 30 different components used probably 4 to 7 are different so there are at least 4 to 7 different reasons for something to be a plus or a minus depending on how important each performance feature is to the end user.
โFeb-18-2012 07:06 PM
Chris wrote:
FE we all read about G614's failing. However we have not read about a RIB or R250 failing in trailer service, so please post a link to issues with either! Or get over it, once and for all. Or maybe try a set yourself! It is really time for you to put up or ........... Chris
โFeb-18-2012 04:32 PM
FastEagle wrote:
Itโs been my observation that many factors about the use of steel cased tires fitted to the RV trailer axles is impractical.
There are many reasons for my stance on the subject. Chief among them is the safety factor. I often get labeled a tire basher or brand basher when I point out other choices. And I might even exhibit a little hypocrisy on the few occasions where I have recommended steel cased tires as an option of last resort.
The most disturbing facts about steel cased tires when used on trailers is the amount of damage they inflict on the trailer when they do suffer a catastrophic failure. There are numerous threads on other forums where steel cased tires are used as OE and pictures are shown of the damages caused by their failure. Some times the damage is so severe it will rip away any weather protection, floor boards and enter the interior of the trailer destroying anything in itโs circle of destruction including wiring and water/hydraulic hoses.
There is a lot of extra expense with the 16โ steel cased tires because of the deferent materials used and the manufacturing time involved. And what you really get is a durable tire with the same load capacity as any other well made tire in itโs same size. What 99.9% of the users wont ever take advantage of is its ability to be retreaded/regroved, a feature paid for.
Like the polyester tires, heat is still the major culprit. When doing a walk around inspection with steel cased tires and small wires are observed or felt on the sidewall your getting very close to the dreaded โzipper ruptureโ. Very dangerous condition and when it happens at highway speeds very destructive to the vehicle itโs attached to.
FastEagle
โFeb-18-2012 01:10 PM
โFeb-18-2012 01:00 PM
โFeb-18-2012 12:02 PM
โFeb-18-2012 06:45 AM
Chris wrote:
snip
Maybe CarpriRacer will take the time to address the plus or minus issues of steel carcass tires?
Chris