cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Revived Trailer Tire Thread (formerly on the 5th Wheel Forum

CapriRacer
Explorer II
Explorer II
OK, I'll try this again but with a different tack.

I am of the opinion that ST tires should have a 15% reserve capacity (85% of the load at a given pressure) in order to be reasonably sure they won't fail. There are a couple of ways of estimating what the actual load is on a given tire of a trailer, but the best way is to actually measure each tire. The RMA has a procedure to follow:

http://www.rma.org/publications/tire_service_professionals/index.cfm?PublicationID=11516

I am of the opinion that this 15% reserve capacity is likely to require higher load ranges and larger sized ST tires - or both. And maybe even a step into LT type tires - and here is where it gets tricky.

While I feel uncomfortable recommending that LT tires be loaded to their maximum load, that is in essence the result. I feel uncomfortable with that because I don't have enough experience to say it with confidence. However, I have no hesitation in recommending replacing ST tires with LT tires if it can be done with enough clearances around the tire.

A couple of other points:

ST tires can be inflated 10 psi over the maximum pressure listed in the sidewall of the tire - and I'd recommend that if you can't get to a 15% reserve capacity.

Recent bulletins from the tire industry indicate that tires degrade simply due to time. The age of a tire is important even if the tire is unused.

There is some disagreement over how to best express this age limitation,
but my take is:

If you live in a hot climate (AZ, CA, NV, TX, and FL) then the limit is six years. If you live in a cold climate (MN, ND, WI, MT, etc), then the limit is 10 years. States in between are ..... ah ........ in between.

A rule of thumb for estimating if you need more load carrying capacity:

Check the cold (ambient temperature) tire pressure before starting off. Measure the inflation pressure after an hour of driving.

If the tire pressure build up is less than 10%, it's OK. If the pressure build up is between 10% and 15%, then continue to monitor until you are sure it is not above 15%. If the pressure buildup is 15% or greater, add load carrying capacity (and one of the ways to do that is to add pressure). For ST and LT tires, NEVER use more than 10 psi over the sidewall pressure.

Any questions?
********************************************************************

CapriRacer

Visit my web site: www.BarrysTireTech.com
945 REPLIES 945

azjeffh
Explorer
Explorer
daamac wrote:
True or not?
Better suited, who knows? Not for me I know. Apparently though as I found out, they are not designed to hit pot holes ๐Ÿ™‚
Jeff
Wonderful wife Robin
2016 F350 PSD Dually
2016 DRV 38RSSA

Chris3
Explorer
Explorer
daamac wrote:
When you read comments on forums such as this about switching from an ST to an LT tire, one of the things you read is that ST tires are designed to better withstand the stresses created when turning a dual axle trailer - that this design in some way makes ST tires more suited for dual axle trailer use than LT tires.

True or not?


If you read CapriRacers post he states construction of ST and LT tires is similar.

The only real difference is that ST tires are built and tested to lesser standards than LT tires, carry a lower speed restriction and have higher K factors (loading).

Side construction falls between P(car) and LT(Light Truck). THEY DO NOT HAVE STRONGER SIDEWALLS THAN LT TIRES!

Chris
My Rig
2001.5 2500 STD CAB AUTO SLT 4x4, CTD 4:10's, Bomb'd to Tow
2005 Cardinal 29WBLX.

Chris3
Explorer
Explorer
So here we are after 20 pages of some pretty good input and it is FastEagle and his ST tire agenda against all others including two tire engineers!

A month or so ago he was "getting to old to deal with more ST tires issues"! Now he has reversed that decision to install 17.5 rims and commercial grade truck tires, and getting his third set (plus failure replacements) of TowMax ST's!

What changed that path to putting tire problems behind him?

I would guess that he could not continue his ST/TowMax agenda if he varied from it on his personal trailer! There must be something that we do not know going on behind the scene! I would not run on ST tires even if they were given to me!

All us XPS liars are "happy liars"! I ran mine for 6.5 years and 40K plus miles and sold the 4 of them for $200 on CL! Now giving Bridgestone Duravis R250's a run for the next 6 or 7 years.

Chris
My Rig
2001.5 2500 STD CAB AUTO SLT 4x4, CTD 4:10's, Bomb'd to Tow
2005 Cardinal 29WBLX.

RVhiker
Explorer
Explorer
When you read comments on forums such as this about switching from an ST to an LT tire, one of the things you read is that ST tires are designed to better withstand the stresses created when turning a dual axle trailer - that this design in some way makes ST tires more suited for dual axle trailer use than LT tires.

True or not?
There's lots of advice and information in forums...
sometimes it is correct.

2011 Jayco 28.5RLS; 2008 Chevy 2500HD Crew Cab; Duramax/Allison; Pullrite 14k Superglide Hitch

JIMNLIN
Explorer
Explorer
(snip)
Well, at least when used for the "light truck" application intended by the manufacturer. Frankly , I'm surprised when I hear that any tire mfr. would honor an LT warranty if the tires are placed on a trailer- a use for which most LT's are NOT designed/marketed.


This has got to be one of the biggest misconceptions of the whole ST vs LT debate. However as you gain experience you learn the LT a multi functional tire and with the manufacturers blessing.
Some trailer (all types including RVs) come from the trailer manufacturer with LT tires. Actually before the ST tire was introduced all we had was P (passenger) and LT (light truck) tires.

Michelin websites as all websites change from year to year and much advertising info gets lost in cyberland. This is a copy and paste from a haulers website of Michelins XPS Rib saying their recommended for commercial trailer service. The wise trailer owner (all types) would do well to follow a LT tire manufactures/trailer experienced dealers recommendation for a certain line of their LTs for using in a trailer position.

Michelinยฎ XPS Ribยฎ tires are the best value per mile in the Michelin commercial tire lineup and an ideal choice for commercial trailers because of low rolling resistance (for better fuel economy), a long-wear tread design and retreadability. These tires also have the strength of a reinforced all-steel construction for lasting durability.
Responsive handling helps you negotiate through tough traffic
Greater durability and puncture
resistance from a third steel belt.
Easily retreadable all-steel casing
Lowest cost per mile in this category
Resists sidewall damage with the sculptured sidewall protector.
Sidewall: black serrated
outline lettering.
Load Range: E
Service Description: 120/116Q
"good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment" ............ Will Rogers

'03 2500 QC Dodge/Cummins HO 3.73 6 speed manual Jacobs Westach
'97 Park Avanue 28' 5er 11200 two slides

CapriRacer
Explorer II
Explorer II
FastEagle wrote:
No matter the type or design tire used on our trailers, they still have to have the proper air pressure to operate within itโ€™s advertised parameters. According to a NHTSA survey, under inflation is the most abused condition found when inspecting tires used on our highways.

So letโ€™s ask the engineers some questions. Iโ€™ll kick it off with these.What is the origin of the load inflation charts found on the internet from various tire manufacturers?....

The tire standardizing organizations: The Tire and Rim Association (TRA) for the US based tire manufacturers, ETRTO (European Tyre and Rim Technical Organization) for the European based tire manufacturers, and JATMA (Japanese Automobile Tire Manufacturers Association) for the tire manufacturers based in Japan. There are others, but those are the 3 main ones and they all consult with each other. While the standards may be slightly different, the operative word here is "slightly' - not enough to worry about.

HOWEVER, no tire manufacturer is obligated to use those standards. They can make up anything they want. There is no law that says they CAN'T. There ARE laws about some of the details - like what has to appear on the sidewall, the size of the letters, the tests that have to be passed, etc.

I hope it is obvious that deviating from TRA, ETRTO, JATMA, etc. carries with it a HUGE legal risk. A tire manufacturer would be well advised to either use the standards as written or get them modified. You will rarely find deviation because of that.
FastEagle wrote:
... Are they written for the public at large to apply them as they see fit?........

No.
FastEagle wrote:
........Or, are they essentially provided as a tool for vehicle manufacturers and tire installers?.......


Not tire installers. Here's how this works:

Tire manufacturers design their tires to the tire standards as published. Vehicle manufacturers select the tire size and inflation pressure based on that same standard. That size and inflation pressure info is published somewhere for use by the vehicle's operator.

For cars, light trucks, and trailers, it's published on the vehicle tire placard.

- and so everyone understands where my expertise ends, it is here. I am thoroughly familiar with cars and light trucks, and barely so with trailers. I also have extensive experience with earthmover, industrial, and mining equipment, but medium trucks is an area I have't explored much. So some of what I post may be off the mark a bit.

BUT - For medium trucks, the weights of the vehicles are highly regulated, so the tire loads are published by the vehicle manufactirers and the trucking companies work with the tire manufacturers to select appropriate tires.

So for cars and pickup trucks, the vehicle tire placard tells both the consumer and the tire dealer, enough information to properly size and inflate the tires. The same applies to RV trailer - EXCEPT _ there appears to be a problem - which is the point of these discussions.
FastEagle wrote:
.......We see lots of information about getting our trailerโ€™s to the scales and getting each tire position weighed. Then we are told to air the tires to the highest weight on each axle as long as itโ€™s within the tires operating parameters. Isnโ€™t that being counter productive? Doing that provides zero load capacity reserves for the heavy tire. Besides that, the procedure may not apply to all trailers because, we are already told by the vehicle manufacturer to air our tires to the maximum allowed via the tire placard.

FastEagle


I see 3 problems:

1) The sources of these recommendations are different.

2) Some of these recommendations are based on the situation at hand - a vehicle with a specified tire size and Load Range. That really limits what can be said.

3) There is the political situation. The vehicle manufacturers buy from tire manufacturers - and vehicle manufacturers can be pretty demanding. Tire manufacturers are incredibly reluctant to contradict vehicle manufacturers for fear of losing business.

Then there is the issue of WHO is responsible if there is a tire failure. Unless there is a documented overload situation, then the vehicle manufacturer washes his hands of the situation, so by default it becomes the tire manufacturer's. (Editorial note: I am sure my prejudice is showing.)

On the surface it appears that RV trailer manufacturers select their tires so they are barely within the loading parameters - so when the tire manufacturers say follow the pressure listed on the tire's sidewall, they are making the best of the situation.

Weighing trailers? That's supposed to detect when the tires are overloaded. Apparently, this is pretty common occurance - although I don't have firsthand knowledge.

Remember when I said that tire manufacturers are reluctant to contradict vehicle manufacturers? The recommendation to weigh the trailer is a way of determining when the vehicle manufacturer hasn't done his job properly - without the fear of reprisal.

Reserve tire capacity? This again goes back to the business of contradicting the vehicle manufacturer. Unlike General Motors, or Ford, or Peterbilt, RV manufacturers don't buy tires in such large volumes. Plus individually, they are such small potatoes they don't merit attention. As evidence of this, I point to NHTSA which pays very little attention to the RV market.

Besides, airing the tires up to the sidewall maximum is basically what is on the vehicle placard, so there is no contradiction there.

And my last thought: Roger and I both are working outside the business system - and that gives us a certain amount of manuevering room that doesn't exist with official publications. You will find us - well - not exactly contradicting what is published, but offering advice that you probably won't get from vehicle manufacturers or tire manufacturers. That advice is based on our experience in how tires work.
********************************************************************

CapriRacer

Visit my web site: www.BarrysTireTech.com

ExRocketScienti
Explorer
Explorer
What constitues a track record? I always thought it was the results of actual use. But the impression I get from FE, they have to be OE, or they don't count. I don't agree with that. I have seen numerous posts here on rv.net where Rib users have used them for several years already and much higher mileage than what most of us put on a trailer without any issues. To me, that is establishing a track record. In fact, we also often get information on the tires that the poster previously used on the same trailer, so we have a track record for those too. They are often ST tires and are a poor track record. Now I believe part of this can be explained by the ST tires having no reserves but the replacement Ribs having reserves. But in the case of 6K axles, the Ribs only have 42 pounds per tire in reserves. Not much, but they still hold up. Once again, I think Michelin overbuilt this tire.

And FE, I think the early G614s had a problem that Goodyear has addressed, just like the early Marathons had an issue they addressed. The newer Marathons have some extra marking on the sidewall so that you can tell the difference, but I don't remember what that marking is.

Oh, and I know of one person who ran a set of Ribs on a fiver to the point they should be replaced because of age. He was able to then sell the tires. Don't know if the new owner had them regrooved or not.

There are also a number of people who have put the BF Goodrich Commercial TA on their 5.2K axles. It is an excellent replacement, and I have not heard of anyone having problems with this combination. I know I haven't. Since I made the switch, we enjoy using the trailer so much more, we have doubled the mileage we put on it per year. But since those aren't OE, I guess it won't count.
ERS

ol_Bombero-JC
Explorer
Explorer
FastEagle wrote:
Chris wrote:


FE we all read about G614's failing. However we have not read about a RIB or R250 failing in trailer service, so please post a link to issues with either! Or get over it, once and for all. Or maybe try a set yourself! It is really time for you to put up or ........... Chris


They donโ€™t have a documented track record. Who would dare post a failure in this forum after bragging how well they worked for awhile. Go to Michelinโ€™s truck tire maintenance manual. They have pictures of failed steel cased tires.

FE


YIKES!!
Pot calling the kettle black!.:S

Speaking of posting "failures" . . . . and bragging how well they work -

compliments are due to *you* FE, as *you* have posted your personal failures of 21 ST tires, as well as the statement on your blog,
"Right after I started hauling a big heavy fifth wheel trailer around the country, the tires started failing."

Impossible to match - even with 40 years of towing trailers!
Of course some of us are deviates!.:W
We "deviated" from the ST path of righteousness!

If you are going to chalk those "failures" off to road hazards of various kinds - (as we all know you meticulously maintain tire pressure) - besides a tire expert - you are most definitely *THE* EXPERT at finding the worst roads (with the most road hazards) in the USA!

Kind of like Joe Btfsplk (from Li'l Abner) with the black cloud following him around hanging over his head.

You should be the title holder in the Guinness Book of records!

Cheers!.:B


BTW Francesca: -
Michelin *does* recommend XPS Ribs (LT tires) for trailer use.

~

Francesca_Knowl
Explorer
Explorer
Tireman9 wrote:


Sorry there is no simple answer because there are a number of components that are different for different reasons between the two type tires. Of the 20 - 30 different components used probably 4 to 7 are different so there are at least 4 to 7 different reasons for something to be a plus or a minus depending on how important each performance feature is to the end user.

Speaking of differences....
I've been following this thread very closely and suddenly I'm wondering if we're all starting from the same place re a very basic difference between ST and LT tires- that of intended service life.

Especially given that some folks seem to think that ST's are "cheaper" due to having lower unit prices!

Is it generally understood from the get-go that ST's:

1) are NOT designed to wear out (That's why most ST's don't have "wear bars")
and
2)ST lifespan is more greatly influenced by duty cycles rather than by time/mileage
and
3)ST's must be replaced at 3 years m/l and around 15,000 miles regardless of any appearance of "lots of tread left".

Properly managed, ST's are actually more expensive (per mile) than LT's, which are advertised as giving service over more miles/longer time spans and come with wear bars as indicators of replacement time.
Well, at least when used for the "light truck" application intended by the manufacturer. Frankly , I'm surprised when I hear that any tire mfr. would honor an LT warranty if the tires are placed on a trailer- a use for which most LT's are NOT designed/marketed.
" Not every mind that wanders is lost. " With apologies to J.R.R. Tolkien

FastEagle
Explorer
Explorer
Chris wrote:


FE we all read about G614's failing. However we have not read about a RIB or R250 failing in trailer service, so please post a link to issues with either! Or get over it, once and for all. Or maybe try a set yourself! It is really time for you to put up or ........... Chris


They donโ€™t have a documented track record. Who would dare post a failure in this forum after bragging how well they worked for awhile. Go to Michelinโ€™s truck tire maintenance manual. They have pictures of failed steel cased tires.

FE

Chris3
Explorer
Explorer
FastEagle wrote:
Itโ€™s been my observation that many factors about the use of steel cased tires fitted to the RV trailer axles is impractical.

There are many reasons for my stance on the subject. Chief among them is the safety factor. I often get labeled a tire basher or brand basher when I point out other choices. And I might even exhibit a little hypocrisy on the few occasions where I have recommended steel cased tires as an option of last resort.

The most disturbing facts about steel cased tires when used on trailers is the amount of damage they inflict on the trailer when they do suffer a catastrophic failure. There are numerous threads on other forums where steel cased tires are used as OE and pictures are shown of the damages caused by their failure. Some times the damage is so severe it will rip away any weather protection, floor boards and enter the interior of the trailer destroying anything in itโ€™s circle of destruction including wiring and water/hydraulic hoses.

There is a lot of extra expense with the 16โ€ steel cased tires because of the deferent materials used and the manufacturing time involved. And what you really get is a durable tire with the same load capacity as any other well made tire in itโ€™s same size. What 99.9% of the users wont ever take advantage of is its ability to be retreaded/regroved, a feature paid for.

Like the polyester tires, heat is still the major culprit. When doing a walk around inspection with steel cased tires and small wires are observed or felt on the sidewall your getting very close to the dreaded โ€œzipper ruptureโ€. Very dangerous condition and when it happens at highway speeds very destructive to the vehicle itโ€™s attached to.


FastEagle


FE we all read about G614's failing. However we have not read about a RIB or R250 failing in trailer service, so please post a link to issues with either! Or get over it, once and for all. Or maybe try a set yourself! It is really time for you to put up or ........... Chris
My Rig
2001.5 2500 STD CAB AUTO SLT 4x4, CTD 4:10's, Bomb'd to Tow
2005 Cardinal 29WBLX.

JIMNLIN
Explorer
Explorer
A fabric cased tire can have steel belts under the tread and may/might cause more vehicle damage than all fabric cased tire with fabric tread belts.
However it would be a bad assumption/recommendation that we not use a steel cased 16" E tire or a tire with steel belts under the tread on our trailers because its percieved as causing more vehicle damage.
"good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment" ............ Will Rogers

'03 2500 QC Dodge/Cummins HO 3.73 6 speed manual Jacobs Westach
'97 Park Avanue 28' 5er 11200 two slides

FastEagle
Explorer
Explorer
No matter the type or design tire used on our trailers, they still have to have the proper air pressure to operate within itโ€™s advertised parameters. According to a NHTSA survey, under inflation is the most abused condition found when inspecting tires used on our highways.

So letโ€™s ask the engineers some questions. Iโ€™ll kick it off with these.

What is the origin of the load inflation charts found on the internet from various tire manufacturers?

Are they written for the public at large to apply them as they see fit?

Or, are they essentially provided as a tool for vehicle manufacturers and tire installers?

We see lots of information about getting our trailerโ€™s to the scales and getting each tire position weighed. Then we are told to air the tires to the highest weight on each axle as long as itโ€™s within the tires operating parameters. Isnโ€™t that being counter productive? Doing that provides zero load capacity reserves for the heavy tire. Besides that, the procedure may not apply to all trailers because, we are already told by the vehicle manufacturer to air our tires to the maximum allowed via the tire placard.

FastEagle

FastEagle
Explorer
Explorer
Itโ€™s been my observation that many factors about the use of steel cased tires fitted to the RV trailer axles is impractical.

There are many reasons for my stance on the subject. Chief among them is the safety factor. I often get labeled a tire basher or brand basher when I point out other choices. And I might even exhibit a little hypocrisy on the few occasions where I have recommended steel cased tires as an option of last resort.

The most disturbing facts about steel cased tires when used on trailers is the amount of damage they inflict on the trailer when they do suffer a catastrophic failure. There are numerous threads on other forums where steel cased tires are used as OE and pictures are shown of the damages caused by their failure. Some times the damage is so severe it will rip away any weather protection, floor boards and enter the interior of the trailer destroying anything in itโ€™s circle of destruction including wiring and water/hydraulic hoses.

There is a lot of extra expense with the 16โ€ steel cased tires because of the deferent materials used and the manufacturing time involved. And what you really get is a durable tire with the same load capacity as any other well made tire in itโ€™s same size. What 99.9% of the users wont ever take advantage of is its ability to be retreaded/regroved, a feature paid for.

Like the polyester tires, heat is still the major culprit. When doing a walk around inspection with steel cased tires and small wires are observed or felt on the sidewall your getting very close to the dreaded โ€œzipper ruptureโ€. Very dangerous condition and when it happens at highway speeds very destructive to the vehicle itโ€™s attached to.

FastEagle

Tireman9
Explorer
Explorer
Chris wrote:


snip

Maybe CarpriRacer will take the time to address the plus or minus issues of steel carcass tires?

Chris


Steel carcass tires
Minus - More expensive to manufacture due to material costs and process differences (can't bend steel around beads as easily as you can textile plies is major item) which sometimes require additional pieces be added to the structure. Tire is heavier which reduces load capacity. More expensive.

Plus - Sometimes more durable but this can be partially attributed to the alternate constructions which may have different impact in steel carcass tires tha when used in textile carcass tires, so it is not just the fact that they have steel body ply.

Sorry there is no simple answer because there are a number of components that are different for different reasons between the two type tires. Of the 20 - 30 different components used probably 4 to 7 are different so there are at least 4 to 7 different reasons for something to be a plus or a minus depending on how important each performance feature is to the end user.
40 years experience as tire Design & Quality engineer with focus on failed tire forensics.