โJun-21-2004 09:12 PM
We are getting closer to answers I am looking for etc.
โJun-21-2008 11:15 PM
ponie wrote:
I can tell by your post that you are very proud of the big load that you hauled, but being unwilling to hook to my 5th wheel and press the accelerator to the floor is not meeting any conditions of a pulling comparison. I am not sure why you have such little faith in your truck but your MpG, load of wood and collapsed rear springs notation demonstrates your feeling of accomplishment. Atta Boy.
โJun-21-2008 11:11 PM
8.1 Van wrote:Jumbo Cranium wrote:
Hey 8.1 we are waiting for you to show us where an 8.1 beat a Duramax in a timed quarter mile. Or for that matter, any of the Big 3 diesels.
Here, I'll help.
Stock 6.7 Dodge Cummins running 15's in the quarter
How does 15.66 at 85.46 mph grab ya.
I couldn't find any stock powerstroke times, but since you were the one shooting your mouth off, you should be the one trying to prove it, not me.
We're waiting.
What a slug, on the same website is a 2500HD with 6.0 smallblock that ran 15.194 92.25mph 1/4 mi. There were no 8.1's listed but the 8.1 has tons more power than the 6.0 smallblock.
โJun-21-2008 09:41 AM
โJun-21-2008 07:54 AM
โJun-21-2008 05:39 AM
โJun-21-2008 05:09 AM
โJun-21-2008 05:04 AM
pronstar wrote:
There is so much info that's already been posted - from various third party tests - indicating diesel efficiency & performance superiority versus gas IMHO it's now time for the gas guys to show SOME info, even a little bit, stating otherwise.
It's just so odd to completely discredit a mountain of information without a hint of evidence to the contrary.
Gas guys are asking for "proof" and when it's provided, it's not good enough.
Fair enough. Now let's put the onus on the gas guys to provide some evidence to support their cause. I'm sure many of you will agree that we're tired of doing all the research, only for it to get dismissed.
The internet is huge...surely there is SOME evidence to support your argument?
At best, a good gasser will provide comparable performance with a serious MPG penalty compared to diesel. I think we've got that part covered. Is there anything proving otherwise?
โJun-21-2008 04:57 AM
Jumbo Cranium wrote:
Hey 8.1 we are waiting for you to show us where an 8.1 beat a Duramax in a timed quarter mile. Or for that matter, any of the Big 3 diesels.
Here, I'll help.
Stock 6.7 Dodge Cummins running 15's in the quarter
How does 15.66 at 85.46 mph grab ya.
I couldn't find any stock powerstroke times, but since you were the one shooting your mouth off, you should be the one trying to prove it, not me.
We're waiting.
โJun-20-2008 10:24 PM
Jumbo Cranium wrote:I think he's gone Postal. ๐
Hey 8.1 we are waiting for you to show us where an 8.1 beat a Duramax in a timed quarter mile. Or for that matter, any of the Big 3 diesels.
Here, I'll help.
Stock 6.7 Dodge Cummins running 15's in the quarter
How does 15.66 at 85.46 mph grab ya.
I couldn't find any stock powerstroke times, but since you were the one shooting your mouth off, you should be the one trying to prove it, not me.
We're waiting.
โJun-20-2008 04:08 PM
I've driven 8.1 and LBZ in equivalent sized trucks. 8.1 rules in every driving situations except range on a tank of fuel. However diesel has gotten so expensive fuel considerations is usually a net wash.
I would buy a LBZ for heavy trailering and lots of highway miles. In all other situations the 8.1 is better IMHO and much more fun to drive.
โJun-20-2008 04:08 PM
โJun-20-2008 03:43 PM
8.1 Van wrote:Jarlaxle wrote:
OK, what part of "the Duramax didn't just best the 8100, but TROUNCED it, in every timed acceleration test, empty and loaded" do you not understand?
BS, show me the link. A stock 8.1 pickup will always blow the doors off a stock Duramax in the 1/4 mile.
โJun-20-2008 02:52 PM
โJun-20-2008 12:04 PM
โJun-20-2008 07:06 AM