โMay-05-2014 10:17 AM
โMay-05-2014 07:16 PM
FishOnOne wrote:Terryallan wrote:Dadoffourgirls wrote:
A Ford spokeswoman said no accidents or injuries have been reported in relation to the issue, which according to NHTSA documents was discovered on March 26 at the company's Kentucky truck assembly plant.
Ford will notify owners and dealers will update the software free of charge, according to NHTSA documents. The recall is expected to begin in early May, according to NHTSA documents.
Good for Ford. Being Proactive, instead of waiting for someone to be injured. That's the way it should be done.:C
Perhaps GM getting hit by the big stick could have influenced the proactive move.
โMay-05-2014 06:19 PM
Terryallan wrote:Dadoffourgirls wrote:
A Ford spokeswoman said no accidents or injuries have been reported in relation to the issue, which according to NHTSA documents was discovered on March 26 at the company's Kentucky truck assembly plant.
Ford will notify owners and dealers will update the software free of charge, according to NHTSA documents. The recall is expected to begin in early May, according to NHTSA documents.
Good for Ford. Being Proactive, instead of waiting for someone to be injured. That's the way it should be done.:C
โMay-05-2014 05:31 PM
Hannibal wrote:goducks10 wrote:
I'll tell you about my recalls if you tell me about yours:)
I have nothing to tell. I feel so empty. :B
โMay-05-2014 05:13 PM
Dadoffourgirls wrote:
A Ford spokeswoman said no accidents or injuries have been reported in relation to the issue, which according to NHTSA documents was discovered on March 26 at the company's Kentucky truck assembly plant.
Ford will notify owners and dealers will update the software free of charge, according to NHTSA documents. The recall is expected to begin in early May, according to NHTSA documents.
โMay-05-2014 03:34 PM
goducks10 wrote:
I'll tell you about my recalls if you tell me about yours:)
โMay-05-2014 02:58 PM
โMay-05-2014 01:47 PM
โMay-05-2014 01:04 PM
โMay-05-2014 01:00 PM
catfishmontana wrote:
LOL
โMay-05-2014 12:04 PM
Dadoffourgirls wrote:v10superduty wrote:
OK, DOFG.. :h
6 weeks ago while I was in Florida I posted a link to a story about how a guys OnStar had let him down to recover his stolen vehicle.
You were the first one to reply and accused me of sitting in the rain, surfin the net, looking for negative GM stories to post.
That wasn't my point as it was an interesting situation that I (nor many others) had heard of or thought of.
By the way, there were LOTS of truly negative stories about GM for anyone who wanted to bother to post them.
So what is your point here? :W
Glad you made it back to the North! Too bad you did not bring us any significant warmer weather! :W
I was only posting this as there could be an owner that reads this, and to make sure individuals were aware that there is a potential for a truck to go into reverse for a second when going to drive (so they are not standing behind it). I saw that this was posted on AutoNews this morning (and the fuel guage issue with the CUVs was not included), so was only highlighting it for the safety of my fellow RVers.
I knew that there would be the usual comments.
I guess I should have copied the article discussing GM's success in generating revenue from sales of pickups!
โMay-05-2014 11:31 AM
Dadoffourgirls wrote:v10superduty wrote:
OK, DOFG.. :h
6 weeks ago while I was in Florida I posted a link to a story about how a guys OnStar had let him down to recover his stolen vehicle.
You were the first one to reply and accused me of sitting in the rain, surfin the net, looking for negative GM stories to post.
That wasn't my point as it was an interesting situation that I (nor many others) had heard of or thought of.
By the way, there were LOTS of truly negative stories about GM for anyone who wanted to bother to post them.
So what is your point here? :W
Glad you made it back to the North! Too bad you did not bring us any significant warmer weather! :W
I was only posting this as there could be an owner that reads this, and to make sure individuals were aware that there is a potential for a truck to go into reverse for a second when going to drive (so they are not standing behind it). I saw that this was posted on AutoNews this morning (and the fuel guage issue with the CUVs was not included), so was only highlighting it for the safety of my fellow RVers.
I knew that there would be the usual comments.
I guess I should have copied the article discussing GM's success in generating revenue from sales of pickups!
โMay-05-2014 11:14 AM
v10superduty wrote:
OK, DOFG.. :h
6 weeks ago while I was in Florida I posted a link to a story about how a guys OnStar had let him down to recover his stolen vehicle.
You were the first one to reply and accused me of sitting in the rain, surfin the net, looking for negative GM stories to post.
That wasn't my point as it was an interesting situation that I (nor many others) had heard of or thought of.
By the way, there were LOTS of truly negative stories about GM for anyone who wanted to bother to post them.
So what is your point here? :W
โMay-05-2014 10:55 AM
Francesca Knowles wrote:
:B
I notice you left out the very last line of the Reuters article , O.P.:Reuters wrote:
Over the weekend, GM recalled almost 52,000 SUVs for a fuel gauge issue.
Link to GM Recalls
โMay-05-2014 10:51 AM
โMay-05-2014 10:45 AM