โFeb-26-2016 08:18 PM
2002 GMC Sierra 2500HD 8.1/Allison/4:10/Prodigy brake controler/Pullrite Superglide
Pulling a 2015 Keystone Cougar 280RLS
โFeb-28-2016 07:19 PM
OldRacer wrote:Fabguy wrote:you are most definitely due. `135K to 150 are pretty typical for these models.Me Again wrote:Fabguy wrote:
2002 GMC 2500HD....
Bought it with 250 miles on it.
And now it has 142,000.
I feel no need to "upgrade".
How many sets of injectors? Chris
Still on the originals.
2002 GMC Sierra 2500HD 8.1/Allison/4:10/Prodigy brake controler/Pullrite Superglide
Pulling a 2015 Keystone Cougar 280RLS
โFeb-28-2016 07:03 PM
Fabguy wrote:you are most definitely due. `135K to 150 are pretty typical for these models.Me Again wrote:Fabguy wrote:
2002 GMC 2500HD....
Bought it with 250 miles on it.
And now it has 142,000.
I feel no need to "upgrade".
How many sets of injectors? Chris
Still on the originals.
โFeb-28-2016 07:01 PM
Me Again wrote:Fabguy wrote:
2002 GMC 2500HD....
Bought it with 250 miles on it.
And now it has 142,000.
I feel no need to "upgrade".
How many sets of injectors? Chris
2002 GMC Sierra 2500HD 8.1/Allison/4:10/Prodigy brake controler/Pullrite Superglide
Pulling a 2015 Keystone Cougar 280RLS
โFeb-28-2016 06:52 PM
Me Again wrote:for me and my 03, one set at 88K under warranty. The next set went in at 235K, at my expense. The rest of the truck is so solid and still looks so good (when i clean it up, i have people telling me it still looks new), that i just couldnt see buying a new truck (when every diesel out there has SOME sort of expensive issue from time to time), so for me, spending $5K on injectors to be able to keep driving this truck for at least another 5 years was a financial no brainer.Fabguy wrote:
2002 GMC 2500HD....
Bought it with 250 miles on it.
And now it has 142,000.
I feel no need to "upgrade".
How many sets of injectors? Chris
โFeb-28-2016 06:43 PM
Fabguy wrote:
2002 GMC 2500HD....
Bought it with 250 miles on it.
And now it has 142,000.
I feel no need to "upgrade".
โFeb-28-2016 06:15 PM
โFeb-28-2016 02:35 PM
FishOnOne wrote:blofgren wrote:FishOnOne wrote:blofgren wrote:
I would still have my 2003 Ford F-350 Supercab 4x4 Lariat dually with 6 speed manual transmission if it was a 7.3L, but unfortunately it was a 6.0L diesel that was beginning to have issues so I had to move on. I loved the truck and was sad to see it go but we needed a truck that we could trust to go on long trips with.
I would still have my 2005 Super Duty if it wasn't for the 400HP/800ft/lbs of torque 6.7 PSD that sucked me in. :B
I traded the truck in at 7 years and 170k miles. Replaced the EGR valve and cleaned it another time which caused drive ability issues, but took a whopping 30 minutes to replace. It performed really well and took the family in it everywhere. I even preferred driving it over the wifes vehicle when going just about anywhere.
Hind sight 20/20 I wished I would have transferred it to our ranch hand instead of purchasing a 05 dodge cummins. Which btw had more engine issues at 120k miles (all 6 injectors replaced, cracked exhaust manifold).
Your experience with that Cummins was not common. Further, those repairs are MUCH easier and cheaper than EGR delete, oil cooler replacement, head studs, turbo cleaning, FICM replacement, injector replacement, HPOP and fitting issues, bedplate leak repair, etc. (you get the idea) that most 6.0L diesels are prone to. To think a 6.0L diesel is more reliable than a 5.9L Cummins is downright laughable.
Injector failures on the 5.9 common rail are very common to fail at less than 150k miles and transmission failures less than 100k miles. That 05 Dodge was a constant pain in the arse and the wallet, therefore we decided to cut our losses and sell it before planting season.
Both my BIL's 04 and my 05 6.0 PSD trucks were much better trucks than the 05 and 09 Dodges with the 6.7cummins being the biggest POS there ever was. I will say our 07 5.9 DRW has been a decent truck but it has less than 100k miles and sit's most of the time.
The only advantage the 5.9 had was a lack of EGR which allowed long idle times without soot clogging issues, hence the reason we went back to the 7.3's.
โFeb-28-2016 09:25 AM
blofgren wrote:FishOnOne wrote:blofgren wrote:
I would still have my 2003 Ford F-350 Supercab 4x4 Lariat dually with 6 speed manual transmission if it was a 7.3L, but unfortunately it was a 6.0L diesel that was beginning to have issues so I had to move on. I loved the truck and was sad to see it go but we needed a truck that we could trust to go on long trips with.
I would still have my 2005 Super Duty if it wasn't for the 400HP/800ft/lbs of torque 6.7 PSD that sucked me in. :B
I traded the truck in at 7 years and 170k miles. Replaced the EGR valve and cleaned it another time which caused drive ability issues, but took a whopping 30 minutes to replace. It performed really well and took the family in it everywhere. I even preferred driving it over the wifes vehicle when going just about anywhere.
Hind sight 20/20 I wished I would have transferred it to our ranch hand instead of purchasing a 05 dodge cummins. Which btw had more engine issues at 120k miles (all 6 injectors replaced, cracked exhaust manifold).
Your experience with that Cummins was not common. Further, those repairs are MUCH easier and cheaper than EGR delete, oil cooler replacement, head studs, turbo cleaning, FICM replacement, injector replacement, HPOP and fitting issues, bedplate leak repair, etc. (you get the idea) that most 6.0L diesels are prone to. To think a 6.0L diesel is more reliable than a 5.9L Cummins is downright laughable.
โFeb-28-2016 08:52 AM
FishOnOne wrote:blofgren wrote:
I would still have my 2003 Ford F-350 Supercab 4x4 Lariat dually with 6 speed manual transmission if it was a 7.3L, but unfortunately it was a 6.0L diesel that was beginning to have issues so I had to move on. I loved the truck and was sad to see it go but we needed a truck that we could trust to go on long trips with.
I would still have my 2005 Super Duty if it wasn't for the 400HP/800ft/lbs of torque 6.7 PSD that sucked me in. :B
I traded the truck in at 7 years and 170k miles. Replaced the EGR valve and cleaned it another time which caused drive ability issues, but took a whopping 30 minutes to replace. It performed really well and took the family in it everywhere. I even preferred driving it over the wifes vehicle when going just about anywhere.
Hind sight 20/20 I wished I would have transferred it to our ranch hand instead of purchasing a 05 dodge cummins. Which btw had more engine issues at 120k miles (all 6 injectors replaced, cracked exhaust manifold).
โFeb-28-2016 07:50 AM
Flashman wrote:FishOnOne wrote:Flashman wrote:
Love my 2006 Dodge Mega 2500.
165,000 miles and has been faultless. The only thing I want is a backup camera - all aftermarket ones I look at seem flawed.
I'm sure you left out the transmission problems and the front suspension replacement parts and a set of injectors to boot... :W
Sorry, haven't had any of those problems. You must be thinking of some other brand.
โFeb-28-2016 07:49 AM
blofgren wrote:
I would still have my 2003 Ford F-350 Supercab 4x4 Lariat dually with 6 speed manual transmission if it was a 7.3L, but unfortunately it was a 6.0L diesel that was beginning to have issues so I had to move on. I loved the truck and was sad to see it go but we needed a truck that we could trust to go on long trips with.
โFeb-28-2016 07:31 AM
โFeb-28-2016 05:11 AM
โFeb-28-2016 04:26 AM
FishOnOne wrote:Flashman wrote:
Love my 2006 Dodge Mega 2500.
165,000 miles and has been faultless. The only thing I want is a backup camera - all aftermarket ones I look at seem flawed.
I'm sure you left out the transmission problems and the front suspension replacement parts and a set of injectors to boot... :W