Nov-10-2020 08:52 AM
Nov-15-2020 01:13 PM
Nov-15-2020 05:54 AM
Nov-15-2020 05:23 AM
4x4ord wrote:spud1957 wrote:
Still looking for a truck. Really concerned about the CP4 in the Ford and newer Rams.
Going to look at a '17 3500 next week. Has the HO/Aisin. 80,000 Kms
Anything I need to look for?
Picture
Looks like a very nice truck. I priced out a 2017 Laramie Limited/diesel in the fall of 2017. I was quoted 69k plus tax. I plan on getting a quote on one in the next few days .... my expectation is that the price hasn’t changed much over the last 3 years. What do you have to pay for a 2017 now?
Nov-15-2020 04:57 AM
spud1957 wrote:4x4ord wrote:spud1957 wrote:
Still looking for a truck. Really concerned about the CP4 in the Ford and newer Rams.
Going to look at a '17 3500 next week. Has the HO/Aisin. 80,000 Kms
Anything I need to look for?
Picture
Looks like a very nice truck. I priced out a 2017 Laramie Limited/diesel in the fall of 2017. I was quoted 69k plus tax. I plan on getting a quote on one in the next few days .... my expectation is that the price hasn’t changed much over the last 3 years. What do you have to pay for a 2017 now?
It's a Laramie Limited and the price is $55,560 Canadian dollars. They had it at $59,500 and just marked it down for "Black Friday".
Have it on hold. Going Tuesday to look at it. It's on PEI, I'm in NB. Had a friend there look at it. Front bumper has rock chips and tires should be replaced I'm hoping we can work out a deal.
Nov-15-2020 03:56 AM
4x4ord wrote:spud1957 wrote:
Still looking for a truck. Really concerned about the CP4 in the Ford and newer Rams.
Going to look at a '17 3500 next week. Has the HO/Aisin. 80,000 Kms
Anything I need to look for?
Picture
Looks like a very nice truck. I priced out a 2017 Laramie Limited/diesel in the fall of 2017. I was quoted 69k plus tax. I plan on getting a quote on one in the next few days .... my expectation is that the price hasn’t changed much over the last 3 years. What do you have to pay for a 2017 now?
Nov-14-2020 04:58 AM
spud1957 wrote:
Still looking for a truck. Really concerned about the CP4 in the Ford and newer Rams.
Going to look at a '17 3500 next week. Has the HO/Aisin. 80,000 Kms
Anything I need to look for?
Picture
Nov-13-2020 08:20 PM
Nov-13-2020 06:45 PM
Nov-13-2020 04:58 PM
IdaD wrote:garysol wrote:
The CP4 issue has been way overblown in my opinion. Call your local dealer and ask them how many they have had to replace vs how many trucks they have sold. Also all HO trucks built after July 2020 have a revised symmetrical CP4 pump that may be a fix for those CP4 problems that did arise.
Probably, but it's a known issue that can be really significant. It was certainly a factor when I picked a Ram back in 2015. The current Duramax doesn't have one. They're all good trucks, I'd personally lean towards the one without the known issue. Buying used that might make me lean Ram, new probably Duramax.
Nov-13-2020 05:47 AM
rhagfo wrote:JKJavelin wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
JK have you ever weighed your rear axle loaded? I am betting you are over-inflating for your load.
Sure, I go to the scale a couple times a year. In June the rear axle was 6780, and the RAWR is 7000.
I believe the Firestone chart would call for 75 lbs, so I wouldn't say I'm out of line.
Wow, 6,780# on the rear axle with a 5er that has a GVWR of 12,485#, what else do you carry in the bed. Our 5we is a bit over weight, and carries a pin of 2,700#, never had the rear axle on the 2001 Ram near 6,000# with a heavy in bed tool box.
Nov-13-2020 05:06 AM
JKJavelin wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
JK have you ever weighed your rear axle loaded? I am betting you are over-inflating for your load.
Sure, I go to the scale a couple times a year. In June the rear axle was 6780, and the RAWR is 7000.
I believe the Firestone chart would call for 75 lbs, so I wouldn't say I'm out of line.
Nov-13-2020 04:54 AM
Cummins12V98 wrote:
JK have you ever weighed your rear axle loaded? I am betting you are over-inflating for your load.
Nov-13-2020 04:42 AM
blofgren wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:blofgren wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
Op the truck looks nice. 17 is a good year as is 15, 18.
Not 13, 14, or 16? :h
The 13 and 14 had dual rads but still not a deal breaker. Somehow I’ll manage to change that pesky Y coolant fitting which I’m sure will take a whole 10 minutes. :R
OOPS I missed 16. 13 and 14 are good but the 15's -18's have a better overall track record. Source, years as a member on the TDR.
Lol I remember the guy on there that had a 2014 that he used for hotshotting and it had a pile of trouble free miles on it when he traded it in. But whatever makes you happy! 😉
Nov-13-2020 03:55 AM
Nov-12-2020 04:48 PM
Cummins12V98 wrote:blofgren wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
Op the truck looks nice. 17 is a good year as is 15, 18.
Not 13, 14, or 16? :h
The 13 and 14 had dual rads but still not a deal breaker. Somehow I’ll manage to change that pesky Y coolant fitting which I’m sure will take a whole 10 minutes. :R
OOPS I missed 16. 13 and 14 are good but the 15's -18's have a better overall track record. Source, years as a member on the TDR.