โJun-22-2015 02:30 AM
โJun-22-2015 08:44 AM
โJun-22-2015 08:12 AM
โJun-22-2015 08:00 AM
โJun-22-2015 07:56 AM
โJun-22-2015 07:30 AM
8iron wrote:
Big numbers for sure but is it usable with today's tq management systems? Or better question; when is 900ft/lbs actually available?
โJun-22-2015 06:42 AM
โJun-22-2015 06:39 AM
โJun-22-2015 06:36 AM
โJun-22-2015 06:24 AM
Greentreena wrote:
this is such a competitive market for truck manufacturers- clearly Chrysler wants to hang in there. Cool bragging rights - but I'd rather see a truck that gets better mileage.
โJun-22-2015 06:15 AM
โJun-22-2015 06:09 AM
JIMNLIN wrote:
Hmmm.. a 11.8" rear axle ?? Is that a typo ??
Ram was using the AAM 11.5" rear axle however at 9700-9800 RAWR it was getting closer to AAM max. Wonder what the 11.8" axle is or when did they change ??
โJun-22-2015 06:06 AM
Greentreena wrote:
this is such a competitive market for truck manufacturers- clearly Chrysler wants to hang in there. Cool bragging rights - but I'd rather see a truck that gets better mileage.
โJun-22-2015 06:00 AM
โJun-22-2015 05:58 AM
Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
more than two tons beyond its closest rival.
โJun-22-2015 05:37 AM