โMay-16-2014 05:40 PM
News report wrote:
General Motors recalls another 2.7 million vehicles
The latest action covers eight different models and brings the number of vehicles recalled this year by the nationโs largest automaker to more than 11.1 million in the United States and 12.8 million worldwide. That put GM on course to break its 2004 domestic recall record of 11.8 million vehicles, the company said.
News report wrote:
DETROIT (AP) โ General Motors has added yet another recall to its growing list for the year.
The recall of 218,000 Chevrolet Aveo subcompact cars is the company's 29th this year, bringing the total number of recalled GM vehicles in the U.S. to around 13.8 million. That breaks GM's previous annual record of 10.75 million set in calendar year 2004.
โMay-22-2014 07:38 AM
Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:spoon059 wrote:Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
If the banks would have refinanced GM and Chrysler we 2 would not be having this conversation.
Don
And if GM or Chrysler had better management practices at the time they wouldn't have had the sudden and urgent need for a massive influx of capital. They would have been able to sell a product for a profit and been in possession of their own capital, thus not needing a bailout. I guess that little point doesn't factor into your argument very well though...
Miss management and the union pond scum had nothing to do with it. Fords loans came do before the Banks locked their vaults. In order for Ford to get their loans refinanced the Ford Family had to put up their personal property and stake in Ford to secure the refi. BTW two thumbs up to the Ford family!
GM and Chrysler did not have that option and it's a good thing for Chrysler GM didn't. Had GM been able to secure their refi, Cerberus Capital would have sold off the Ram and Jeep lines to the highest bidder then closed the rest.
When the Government was looking for someone to take over Chrysler Corp Nissan steeped up and said they would take Ram and Jeep only. They were told take it all or nothing so they walked away. So enter Fiat, looking to get their foot back in the USA what better way then to take over Chrysler. Unlike what some of the uninformed think it did cost Fiat money, just not up front. Fiat has pumped tons of cash into Chrysler and our plants.
No matter what Spoon and others think, had GM and Chrysler closed the effect on the US economy would have been devastating. Remember nobody was buying anything at that time. People that had jobs were so scared that they were forgoing any larger purchases. So the other car manufactures would not have picked up anything and all but the largest of GM and Chrysler's suppliers would have closed their doors. This would have then started a domino effect and spread not only though the US but the world. Think I'm full of BS? Do some research there is a reason why everyone was pushing for the bailout, even people that didn't like GM and Chrysler.
Don
โMay-22-2014 07:16 AM
ib516 wrote:
Another GM recall announced today...on their 2015 HD trucks (2500/3500). I didn't read it, just scanned the headline. They are having a rough time these days.
โMay-21-2014 10:29 PM
ib516 wrote:
Another GM recall announced today...on their 2015 HD trucks (2500/3500). I didn't read it, just scanned the headline. They are having a rough time these days.
โMay-21-2014 09:21 PM
โMay-21-2014 07:25 PM
ford truck guy wrote:Aimstr8 wrote:
And your Ford is about to break down and not be covered under warranty.
Ha ha ha ha ... Original
โMay-21-2014 06:27 PM
Fordlover wrote:
The author says that Loan = Bailout. Interesting. Wrong, but interesting.
โMay-21-2014 06:12 PM
Charlie D. wrote:Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
If you want to get upset read this!!!
That is nearly 2 years old. Got anything more recent.
โMay-21-2014 05:55 PM
Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
If you want to get upset read this!!!
โMay-21-2014 04:08 PM
โMay-21-2014 10:54 AM
โMay-21-2014 09:59 AM
โMay-21-2014 09:15 AM
spoon059 wrote:Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
If the banks would have refinanced GM and Chrysler we 2 would not be having this conversation.
Don
And if GM or Chrysler had better management practices at the time they wouldn't have had the sudden and urgent need for a massive influx of capital. They would have been able to sell a product for a profit and been in possession of their own capital, thus not needing a bailout. I guess that little point doesn't factor into your argument very well though...
โMay-21-2014 08:58 AM
Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
Ford: used its $5.9 billion loan to convert two truck plants to small-car production and to develop more fuel-efficient vehicles like the Ford Focus EV and C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid, on sale this fall. Loan repayments start in September. Ford says it will spend $14 billion over the next seven years on advanced-technology vehicles.
โMay-21-2014 08:51 AM
parkersdad wrote:
Read up boys
http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/2012/08/29/automakers-report-card-who-still-owes-taxpayers-money-the-answer-might-surprise-you/
โMay-21-2014 08:47 AM
parkersdad wrote:
Read up boys
CLICKY LINKY