cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

What does this mean???

SoonerWing03
Explorer
Explorer
One of the TT's that I am considering has the following weight ratings (taken from the stickers on the unit).

UVW: 5020 lbs
GVWR: 6500 lbs

Max Cargo: 1440 lbs

2 axel's each rated at 3500 lbs

My question is this, if the axel's can support 7,000 lbs, why would the GVWR be 6500 lbs? Does this mean that the frame is not strong enough to support more? Or does it mean that the tires cannot support that much weight? Or neither?
23 REPLIES 23

moresmoke
Explorer
Explorer
Could be similar to my TT. 3500 lb axles, about 6000lbs. loaded ready to camp. Due to the great condition of the roads on some parts of this continent, I bent 3 axles before I gave up and went to 5000 lb axles with air ride.

SoundGuy
Explorer
Explorer
SoonerWing03 wrote:
So with that said, if I upgraded the tires could I effectively increase the cargo capacity?


trail-explorer wrote:
Only applicable if the tires are the weakest link.


Exactly. My Coachmen which was rated by the manufacturer at over a ton of CCC came with Chinese manufactured ST205/75 R14 LR C tires rated at 1760 lbs @ 50 p.s.i. When one of them split for no apparent reason last year I replaced all four with a set of Goodyear Endurance ST205/75 R14 rated at 2040 lbs @ 65 p.s.i. The improved difference in handling was startling but the trailer's CCC is no different than it was before because the rest of the suspension system components - 3500 lb axles, equalizers, springs, etc, are all still the same. I did also replace the stock nylon bushings with Never Fail bushings but that wouldn't improve CCC either. If the trailer had too little CCC then I'd be concerned but with more than 2000 lbs to work with it will never be an issue with a trailer of this size, even though I often also travel with content in the tanks. The bottom line remains the same - the more CCC the better. 😉
2012 Silverado 1500 Crew Cab
2014 Coachmen Freedom Express 192RBS
2003 Fleetwood Yuma * 2008 K-Z Spree 240BH-LX
2007 TrailCruiser C21RBH * 2000 Fleetwood Santa Fe
1998 Jayco 10UD * 1969 Coleman CT380

Terryallan
Explorer II
Explorer II
Looking at the GVWR / max cargo carrying cap. I would pass on the TT. It does NOT have the carrying capacity needed. Yes there is a good chance you won't load 1400lb into the TT. but there is a chance you might load more, IF you carry water.
IMOP. You need a TT with a lighter UVW, or a TT with a higher GVWR.
Terry & Shay
Coachman Apex 288BH.
2013 F150 XLT Off Road
5.0, 3.73
Lazy Campers

Bobbo
Explorer II
Explorer II
The numbers don't ever add up. They are not meant to. They are derived individually.
Bobbo and Lin
2017 F-150 XLT 4x4 SuperCab w/Max Tow Package 3.5l EcoBoost V6
2017 Airstream Flying Cloud 23FB

trail-explorer
Explorer
Explorer
SoonerWing03 wrote:
So with that said, if I upgraded the tires could I effectively increase the cargo capacity?


Only applicable if the tires are the weakest link.
Bob

dodge_guy
Explorer II
Explorer II
Huntindog wrote:
dodge guy wrote:
It could also be the springs are rated lower than the axles.
Usually (maybe always?) the axles come from Dexter, LCI etc. with the springs as a matched unit. I have never seen an axle that for example, had a tag for 3500# not have 1750 # springs from the factory.

What I have seen is a 5200# axle that was the same as it's 6000# cousin, the only difference was the springs. But they were tagged at 5200 and 6000#.

So in that case, one could put the 3000# springs on it and have a 6000# axle. But it would still be tagged at 5200#.


I was wondering about that. I didn’t know if the axles came without springs and then they simply installled the springs they needed or if they came complete.
Wife Kim
Son Brandon 17yrs
Daughter Marissa 16yrs
Dog Bailey

12 Forest River Georgetown 350TS Hellwig sway bars, BlueOx TrueCenter stabilizer

13 Ford Explorer Roadmaster Stowmaster 5000, VIP Tow>
A bad day camping is
better than a good day at work!

Huntindog
Explorer
Explorer
dodge guy wrote:
It could also be the springs are rated lower than the axles.
Usually (maybe always?) the axles come from Dexter, LCI etc. with the springs as a matched unit. I have never seen an axle that for example, had a tag for 3500# not have 1750 # springs from the factory.

What I have seen is a 5200# axle that was the same as it's 6000# cousin, the only difference was the springs. But they were tagged at 5200 and 6000#.

So in that case, one could put the 3000# springs on it and have a 6000# axle. But it would still be tagged at 5200#.
Huntindog
100% boondocking
2021 Grand Design Momentum 398M
2 bathrooms, no waiting
104 gal grey, 104 black,158 fresh
FullBodyPaint, 3,8Kaxles, DiscBrakes
17.5LRH commercial tires
1860watts solar,800 AH Battleborn batterys
2020 Silverado HighCountry CC DA 4X4 DRW

dodge_guy
Explorer II
Explorer II
It could also be the springs are rated lower than the axles.
Wife Kim
Son Brandon 17yrs
Daughter Marissa 16yrs
Dog Bailey

12 Forest River Georgetown 350TS Hellwig sway bars, BlueOx TrueCenter stabilizer

13 Ford Explorer Roadmaster Stowmaster 5000, VIP Tow>
A bad day camping is
better than a good day at work!

rbpru
Explorer II
Explorer II
The sticker is telling you that for whatever reason or reasons or safety factors or phase of the moon; the TT manufacturer is telling you the TT is designed for a specific maximum load.

My F-150's weight and max cargo is less than the axel ratings because that is what Ford wants based on whatever factors they consider.

You can play whatever guessing games you want, but you cannot change the fact that the TT maker only want you to haul a certain amount of weight.

You can ignore the factory numbers and haul what you like. I am sure many people do. But you do so at your own risk. At least when something goes wrong, you will know who to blame.
Twenty six foot 2010 Dutchmen Lite pulled with a 2011 EcoBoost F-150 4x4.

Just right for Grandpa, Grandma and the dog.

APT
Explorer
Explorer
SoonerWing03 wrote:
It's not that I don't believe them, I am just trying to figure out why their numbers don't seem to add up....why the GVWR would be less than the axel rating.


Why do you think the axle rating should match GVWR?

If they do not match, then the axles are not the weakest component in the RV. The problem is that no one except the manufacturer does know what the weakest link is.
A & A parents of DD 2005, DS1 2007, DS2 2009
2011 Suburban 2500 6.0L 3.73 pulling 2011 Heartland North Trail 28BRS
2017 Subaru Outback 3.6R
2x 2023 Chevrolet Bolt EUV (Gray and Black Twins)

SoonerWing03
Explorer
Explorer
myredracer wrote:
Be aware that if your frame ever fails for any reason during the warranty period, Lippert will automatically blame the owner for overloading the frame. And you can be assured if you did something to try and increase the GVWR, that'd be another reason to invalidate the warranty.

Some frames are barely able to support the UVW when they leave the factory. Looking at frames when shopping is a very good idea. I'd avoid the type of frame that is 3 pieces of sheet steel welded together to make an I-beam. Brochures won't tell you a TT has one of them. Some manufacturers even call these weak frames "heavy duty".

We had a previous TT and the day after we owned it, we discovered a major defect in the frame. Lippert stated "it's within spec.". Took it to a gov't certified inspection facility and they produced a report which led to the entire TT being replaced. The frame & axle shop said it was the worst frame they'd ever seen. Def. not overloaded as we hadn't even put a single thing in it yet!

You can upgrade axles with higher rated ones and install a higher load range tire, but the GVWR assigned by the factory won't change. Frames unfortunately are not required to meet any gov't regulations or industry standards and Lippert can build them however they want. Most frames (Lippert) have cold-rolled once-piece I-beams but can vary in height and some have additional reinforcement at the spring hangers. Different TT manufacturers can use stronger or weaker frame designs for similar length and wt. of TTs yet have varying GVWRs assigned to them. Getting a TT with a higher CCC *should* mean a stronger frame, but not always. I suggest crawling under frames when shopping and take notes and photos. I think you'll be surprised at how different they can be. Take 12-13% off a GVWR when shopping to get an estimate of weight on axles & tires. Never use the UVW or dry tongue wt. numbers.

Frames that flex a lot can even damage the superstructure that sits on it. This photo is a failed weld in the aluminum superstructure from excessive frame flex on a TT less than a year old. Bouncy & rough roads and/or many miles on weak frames can increase the chances of significant issues like this. Some frames even develop fatigue cracks above the spring hangers from excessive flex.

A few TTs have BAL frames and Outdoors RV/Nash/Artic Fox use their own in-house built HD off-road certified frames. If we ever bought another TT I'd be looking at one of these.

I highly recommend taking a brand new TT straight to a scale on the way home from the dealer and keeping the scale ticket somewhere safe.

Shop wisely!



What a wealth of information. Thank you kindly.

donn0128
Explorer II
Explorer II
Don't get excited about it. You have the GVWR and inside there will be a yellow tag with weight as it left the factory. That's what you need to know.

Huntindog
Explorer
Explorer
SoonerWing03 wrote:
One of the TT's that I am considering has the following weight ratings (taken from the stickers on the unit).

UVW: 5020 lbs
GVWR: 6500 lbs

Max Cargo: 1440 lbs

2 axel's each rated at 3500 lbs

My question is this, if the axel's can support 7,000 lbs, why would the GVWR be 6500 lbs? Does this mean that the frame is not strong enough to support more? Or does it mean that the tires cannot support that much wait? Or neither?
You can tell if the frame is weak for sure, IF the tires can support 1750 each (=3500). If so, then the frame is weak. If not it could be the tires or the frame or both.
Huntindog
100% boondocking
2021 Grand Design Momentum 398M
2 bathrooms, no waiting
104 gal grey, 104 black,158 fresh
FullBodyPaint, 3,8Kaxles, DiscBrakes
17.5LRH commercial tires
1860watts solar,800 AH Battleborn batterys
2020 Silverado HighCountry CC DA 4X4 DRW

DutchmenSport
Explorer
Explorer
Best explanation I've found in simple English: Click here.