Oct-24-2016 08:40 PM
Nov-02-2016 02:18 PM
Oct-30-2016 06:51 AM
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be
Douglas AdamsOct-29-2016 03:21 PM
Oct-29-2016 08:17 AM
brooks379 wrote:
You think you have it bad when it comes to tolls.....
Driving a semi from west to east and you have a 4 am appointment to unload in NYC no time to by pass them.
Kansas $8.50
Pa. $145.00
NJ $85.00
George Washington bridge $90.00
Fee just to enter the produce market $25.00
Fee to have your trailer unloaded $175.00 to $350.00
and now you have to turn around and pay going back west unless you have the time to bypass the tolls...but probably not because EVERYONE wants their truckload delivered ASAP !!! I hope I never have to cross the Mississippi river going east ever again !! Been there done that many times and don't ever want to do it again. Tolls suck and they just keep on going up, up, up !!
Oct-29-2016 08:05 AM
Oct-28-2016 01:16 PM
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be
Douglas AdamsOct-28-2016 11:07 AM
Crowe wrote:You are correct. I guess just venting, it seems like everything is going up in large percentages except wages. Look at vehicles, health insurance, RV's, It wasn't that long ago you could get a nice New Horizon 5th wheel for 100k now 200k.
Midwest wages aren't as much as East and West coast.
I fully understand that but our costs of living are also higher, so that might be a "net exchange". What I should have included is how much extra fuel it may cost to circumvent the toll road. Sometimes it's just not economical.
Oct-28-2016 11:01 AM
paulj wrote:Yep dipping into the highway fund. Kansas by law has to have a balanced budget.colliehauler wrote:
...
I guess I wouldn't feel so bad about it but the state keeps raiding the highway fund to spend on other programs. I want good roads and don't mind paying for them. It's when they redirect the funds for other uses.
I was going to ask where that's happening. In recent years Congress has had to transfer money from the general budget to the Highway Trust fund. But then I noticed you are in Kansas, where the governor cuts taxes to boost growth. Have they been dipping into the highway fund to make up for those cuts?
But isn't the idea that certain kinds of taxes can only be spent in certain way at bit archaic - must political in nature than sound economics? The government does spend your income taxes on boosting your income. They don't spend the sales taxes on grocery stores. Cig taxes on expanded sales.
Federal gas taxes were simply the most politically palatable way of raising funds for the Interstate system in the 1950s.
Oct-28-2016 09:25 AM
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be
Douglas AdamsOct-28-2016 09:21 AM
colliehauler wrote:
...
I guess I wouldn't feel so bad about it but the state keeps raiding the highway fund to spend on other programs. I want good roads and don't mind paying for them. It's when they redirect the funds for other uses.
Oct-28-2016 05:35 AM
Crowe wrote:
I'm not happy with the increase in cost myself and I do understand the principle of the matter but I do find it a bit amusing that so many RVers complain about an additional $10 when they've already spent a fair amount of money on a rig, camping fees, activities, etc. Alternate routes are often much slower with constant stop and go. The increase in travel time to me just isn't worth it. If using Rt. 20 takes me 3 hours but the Pike only 2 then that's 1 hour extra I can sit and relax. Well worth the $10.
Oct-28-2016 05:21 AM
shooker99 wrote:Same with fuel tax and any other tax added on, we pay for it.
If trucks pay toll the toll is added on to the product that YOU BUY. You can stay home not use the road but YOU the consumer is paying the toll on any thing that you buy that travels up or down the toll road.
Oct-28-2016 04:09 AM
Oct-27-2016 09:10 PM