Nov-20-2015 03:07 AM
Nov-20-2015 10:45 AM
Nov-20-2015 10:29 AM
Nov-20-2015 09:22 AM
Nov-20-2015 09:12 AM
azjeffh wrote:
What prompted this thread was caused by a salesman. :h
After giving him my requirements (6400 payload being #1) he has me come look at a truck he has in stock that meets that requirement. When I open the door and see it has a ~5400 payload I bring it to his attention. He says impossible, it has a GVWR of 14K. I tell him Ford marked it, why would they lie?
Later on that evening he calls back and said he and another salesman have determined it has a 6400 payload capacity :S
I believe had I been able to get a truck with a 6400 lb payload it would have met my needs as it would have been under in all weights (GVWR,GCWR,RAWR). However it appears that is not going to happen.
Nov-20-2015 09:00 AM
Nov-20-2015 07:53 AM
PRodacy wrote:
Look at GMC and Dodge. They may have better payloads available.
Nov-20-2015 07:42 AM
rosspulliam wrote:transamz9 wrote:azjeffh wrote:
Just ordered a new 5er and looking for a truck to pull it (21K GVWR).
According to Ford's website, I should be able to get a 2016 F350 4X4 dually diesel that has a 14K GVWR with a 6460 payload capacity. The problem is when I went to look at one last week the label on the door stated ~5400 lbs payload. To me that doesn't make much sense since I doubt the vehicle's unladen weight is 8600 lbs. Shouldn't GVWR-CCC=unladen? I did verify the vehicle did indeed have a 14K GVWR placard. The GCWR is 35K which should be well within the limits of the combo.
In addition I'm trying to decide between the 3.73 and the 4.30 rear end. I understand the 4.30 has a 3K greater towing capacity (26.5K vs 23.5K) but will likely burn more fuel. I really don't understand the other advantages of the 4.30.
I had considered the F450 but oddly enough the payload is stated at only 5300 lbs which is really confusing to me.
We plan to full time and travel the US so I'd like to get this right the first time.
Ford posted the 450 with a 14,000# GVWR to be able to have it in the same class as the Ram and Chevy 3500. The 450 is a heavy chassis so it will have less payload than a 350 if you go by the door.
So the OEMs play with the numbers on the door in order to play marketing games?
Who woulda thunk it?
Nov-20-2015 07:38 AM
Nov-20-2015 07:07 AM
transamz9 wrote:azjeffh wrote:
Just ordered a new 5er and looking for a truck to pull it (21K GVWR).
According to Ford's website, I should be able to get a 2016 F350 4X4 dually diesel that has a 14K GVWR with a 6460 payload capacity. The problem is when I went to look at one last week the label on the door stated ~5400 lbs payload. To me that doesn't make much sense since I doubt the vehicle's unladen weight is 8600 lbs. Shouldn't GVWR-CCC=unladen? I did verify the vehicle did indeed have a 14K GVWR placard. The GCWR is 35K which should be well within the limits of the combo.
In addition I'm trying to decide between the 3.73 and the 4.30 rear end. I understand the 4.30 has a 3K greater towing capacity (26.5K vs 23.5K) but will likely burn more fuel. I really don't understand the other advantages of the 4.30.
I had considered the F450 but oddly enough the payload is stated at only 5300 lbs which is really confusing to me.
We plan to full time and travel the US so I'd like to get this right the first time.
Ford posted the 450 with a 14,000# GVWR to be able to have it in the same class as the Ram and Chevy 3500. The 450 is a heavy chassis so it will have less payload than a 350 if you go by the door.
Nov-20-2015 06:42 AM
Nov-20-2015 06:27 AM
stickdog wrote:
Jeff, if you don't think a 350 4x4 drw doesn't weigh 8600 lbs take it out for a test ride and drop by a scales.
Nov-20-2015 06:04 AM
spud1957 wrote:
Curious what rig you are looking at that has a pin weight of 5200lbs?
Nov-20-2015 05:57 AM
azjeffh wrote:lenr wrote:
You nèed to allow some extra pin weight capacity in picking your truck.
Yeah, that's why I was hoping for 6400 lbs. I'm planning on a 5200 pin weight and know with my current setup that the me, wife, hitch and cargo add ~600 lbs, so I would need 5800 minimum.
Nov-20-2015 04:54 AM
lenr wrote:
You nèed to allow some extra pin weight capacity in picking your truck.
Nov-20-2015 04:30 AM
laknox wrote:azjeffh wrote:
Just ordered a new 5er and looking for a truck to pull it (21K GVWR).
According to Ford's website, I should be able to get a 2016 F350 4X4 dually diesel that has a 14K GVWR with a 6460 payload capacity. The problem is when I went to look at one last week the label on the door stated ~5400 lbs payload. To me that doesn't make much sense since I doubt the vehicle's unladen weight is 8600 lbs. Shouldn't GVWR-CCC=unladen? I did verify the vehicle did indeed have a 14K GVWR placard. The GCWR is 35K which should be well within the limits of the combo.
In addition I'm trying to decide between the 3.73 and the 4.30 rear end. I understand the 4.30 has a 3K greater towing capacity (26.5K vs 23.5K) but will likely burn more fuel. I really don't understand the other advantages of the 4.30.
I had considered the F450 but oddly enough the payload is stated at only 5300 lbs which is really confusing to me.
We plan to full time and travel the US so I'd like to get this right the first time.
First off, Jeff, IMO a 350 simply isn't going to handle a FW of that size. You've been around here long enough that you should know that it's not what you can TOW, it's what you can CARRY. The truck's payload is based on a stripped, 2wd, gasser, single cab, with no options. When you start adding stuff, including people, fuel, hitch and "stuff", that all comes off the base payload. The sticker on the door is what's "left over" after the diesel engine goes in, the extra cab is added and the 4wd is put in place. That's where you "lost" that 1,000 lbs. You add a good hitch, that's another ~200 lbs; 2 people is another ~300 lbs; more people means less usable payload for the FW. See the discussion going on here, for a similar situation: http://forums.trailerlife.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/28654682.cfm. With a 21k GVW on the FW, you're solid into a 450, or bigger, truck; again, IMO.
As for the rear end, if you plan on traveling extensively in the western U.S. and Canada, get the 4.10. If you plan on doing most of your traveling east of the Rockies, the 3.73 would be fine. You gain both easier uphills and more engine braking on the downhills with the 4.10; you gain MPG with the 3.73, but sacrifice on the other side.
Lyle