โMay-07-2018 10:16 AM
โMay-16-2018 09:47 PM
โMay-16-2018 03:58 PM
laknox wrote:
To that I say "CR@P!". Given the "quality" of what's put out, if you take extra time building the same # of units, you're almost certain to put out better quality. Drilling a hole to run wires or pex instead of taking a hammer and bashing the hole out (pics posted here a few years ago), cleaning roofs off so trash doesn't poke through the membrane (post just last week regarding this), making sure ducting is actually attached to vents (many, many posts about this), =cleaning= the ducting out (ditto), making sure wiring is attached with the right polarity or not chafed (recent post about a new FW with =burned= wiring at the j-box on the pin of a brand new unit), the list goes on.
If the workforce is so thin in IN, why don't the mfrs consider moving to another location? Hell, here in AZ, with the housing boom going on, people are moving in to work in construction. No need to scrape the bottom of the barrel and hire Marty Methhead. While the economy is improved, there are still many large, unused commercial spaces around the state where a manufacturing facility could be set up. Weather means no snow days shutting down production. COL is cheaper than IN, I'm sure. Two major E/W interstates, with one, I-10, having much better weather to move inventory, especially in the winter.
The list goes on...
Lyle
โMay-14-2018 02:28 PM
justme wrote:
There is little automation in RV industry which means the units are mostly hand built and therefore no two are exactly the same. They all use similar components and accessories. Some are a little better engineered than others but the builds are inconsistent.
Therefore the only real protection a buyers has is warranty protection and PDI. So buyer be ware and do your best to not accept a bad build.
โMay-14-2018 12:32 PM
โMay-14-2018 08:45 AM
ToddD wrote:laknox wrote:
The industry as a whole could start by:
1) Adopting an industry-wide building code.
2) Geting off the pay-per-piece wages that allow the crews to build the day's quota as fast as they can, then leave. Meaning, if they can build the X units for the day's quota in 5 hours, they go home. If the mfr wants X units, make the crews build them in a normal 8 hour shift.
As an owner of a manufacturing firm, I donโt have a problem with work being done fast, I just have a problem of bad work being done fast.
This is a quality accountability problem, not a speed problem.
However, with a workforce supply issue in the Elkhart area, it is difficult to deploy a culture of quality, as the workers themselves are key ingredients in that strategy.
Itโs not impossible to increase output with a fixed labor input while simultaneously holding a high quality standard, but it is definitely difficult to do, which is why there is a quality issue across most of the industry right now.
To achieve high efficiency with quality, first you need quality workers.
โMay-12-2018 02:57 AM
ToddD wrote:laknox wrote:
The industry as a whole could start by:
1) Adopting an industry-wide building code.
2) Geting off the pay-per-piece wages that allow the crews to build the day's quota as fast as they can, then leave. Meaning, if they can build the X units for the day's quota in 5 hours, they go home. If the mfr wants X units, make the crews build them in a normal 8 hour shift.
As an owner of a manufacturing firm, I donโt have a problem with work being done fast, I just have a problem of bad work being done fast.
This is a quality accountability problem, not a speed problem.
However, with a workforce supply issue in the Elkhart area, it is difficult to deploy a culture of quality, as the workers themselves are key ingredients in that strategy.
Itโs not impossible to increase output with a fixed labor input while simultaneously holding a high quality standard, but it is definitely difficult to do, which is why there is a quality issue across most of the industry right now.
To achieve high efficiency with quality, first you need quality workers.
โMay-11-2018 10:51 PM
โMay-11-2018 05:35 PM
laknox wrote:
The industry as a whole could start by:
1) Adopting an industry-wide building code.
2) Geting off the pay-per-piece wages that allow the crews to build the day's quota as fast as they can, then leave. Meaning, if they can build the X units for the day's quota in 5 hours, they go home. If the mfr wants X units, make the crews build them in a normal 8 hour shift.
โMay-11-2018 11:04 AM
dapperdan wrote:
"The industry as a whole could start by:
1) Adopting an industry-wide building code.
2) Geting off the pay-per-piece wages that allow the crews to build the day's quota as fast as they can, then leave. Meaning, if they can build the X units for the day's quota in 5 hours, they go home. If the mfr wants X units, make the crews build them in a normal 8 hour shift.
3) Adopting a more auto-industry-like dealer network that forces dealers to take a FIFO approach to service, no matter where a unit was bought.
4) Ramping up their parts departments so dealers don't wait weeks and months for parts and have them often not be the =right= parts when they finally get there.
5) Pay the dealers for warranty service in a timely manner and a =fair= price.
Notice, I never said anything about LCI products, as that's a completely different issue.
Lylle"
This is a GREAT idea but we as consumers just keep buying sub-par constructed units in record numbers so this most likely will never happen. ๐
Dan
โMay-11-2018 08:52 AM
โMay-11-2018 08:32 AM
justme wrote:
All mfg's have a percentage junk--- The RV industry needs a competitor like Japan that actually forced the American automobile industry build better products. Meanwhile a very detail oriented PDI is the only real defense one has to obtain an RV they will be happy with. NEVER finalize a sale until a very detail oriented PDI is completed and any problem found is corrected to expectation. Otherwise simply walk away and find another dealer. If you are unable to do a proper PDI higher some one who knows what to check for.
โMay-11-2018 07:56 AM
justme wrote:
All mfg's have a percentage junk--- The RV industry needs a competitor like Japan that actually forced the American automobile industry build better products. Meanwhile a very detail oriented PDI is the only real defense one has to obtain an RV they will be happy with. NEVER finalize a sale until a very detail oriented PDI is completed and any problem found is corrected to expectation. Otherwise simply walk away and find another dealer. If you are unable to do a proper PDI higher some one who knows what to check for.
โMay-11-2018 07:34 AM
evergladesgator wrote:
Well, this kills my idea of a Montana purchase.
โMay-11-2018 06:56 AM
justme wrote:
All mfg's have a percentage junk--- The RV industry needs a competitor like Japan that actually forced the American automobile industry build better products. Meanwhile a very detail oriented PDI is the only real defense one has to obtain an RV they will be happy with. NEVER finalize a sale until a very detail oriented PDI is completed and any problem found is corrected to expectation. Otherwise simply walk away and find another dealer. If you are unable to do a proper PDI higher some one who knows what to check for.
โMay-11-2018 06:50 AM