Dec-22-2013 09:42 PM
Dec-26-2013 09:22 AM
bycrackey wrote:C-Leigh Racing wrote:
Other than what Dennis just mentioned, let me see,,,Buffalo NY, snow, ice & SALT a good part of the year up there & then the ruff roads on top of that. Dont make any difference in which highways the owners use, that chassis has took a beating even at 3600 miles.
I have racing friends up in that area, his business is out of Buffalo, so would not be much for me to ask him if he could roll by that dealers lot when he had time to check it out.
Neil
true sort of but at 3600 miles I doubt this Rv has ever seen snow,ice and salt
Neil/ The "doubt word" dont look like much, but it is a big word & being from that part of the USA, if it has not seen salt it would be mighty lucky
show me where in the US u can drive where there are no rough roads at one point or another
Neil/ So true, I will have to agree with you on that. It would probably be easier to prove, where the moneys went that was suppose to be used on our highways, than to find smooth highways.
all this being said the dealership and the salesman without doubt should have declared the accident damge to you on this unit no matter how small or big
Dec-25-2013 06:31 PM
Dec-25-2013 06:07 PM
Dec-24-2013 12:03 PM
C-Leigh Racing wrote:
Other than what Dennis just mentioned, let me see,,,Buffalo NY, snow, ice & SALT a good part of the year up there & then the ruff roads on top of that. Dont make any difference in which highways the owners use, that chassis has took a beating even at 3600 miles.
I have racing friends up in that area, his business is out of Buffalo, so would not be much for me to ask him if he could roll by that dealers lot when he had time to check it out.
Neil
Dec-24-2013 11:58 AM
Dec-24-2013 11:05 AM
soren wrote:dougrainer wrote:
Depending on the state laws(the law where you buy, not where you live), IF you ask a Dealer (even a private seller) a specific question about the condition or circumstances of the vehicle and he LIES to you, he can be sued(very easily).Doug
Without sounding rude, I know that at least a few salespeople reading this thread had a quiet little chuckle reading this.
The larger point is that I would hate for anybody, particularly a newbee to the whole process, to get the idea that a salesperson will not, and cannot lie to you since it's "against the law". The bottom line is this. If you do business with a high volume, low reputation RV dealership, you should expect to be lied to, because there is a great likelihood that you will be. Not only is it common, but there is nothing you are going to do to stop it, other that use common sense, and find another place to do business.
There are two specific reasons that you will NEVER be protected by a law regarding deceptive verbal practices. First, it really is a "he said, she said" world out there. There isn't a lawyer in the world who is willing to waste a moment on case based on, "we though we were buying X, since our salesman said so, but we ended with less, he lied to us." The first thing the lawyer is going to say is, "Show me the proof. Did an independent third party hear the conversation? Show me the paper trail, and where you were clearly defrauded."
No evidence? Just your word against a large company with very deep pockets, no hesitation to dive right into litigation, and the ability to do it with their own staff attorney. Good luck with that. Doesn't matter if you are seeking help in filing a civil suit, or talking to a state A.Gs office, they can't protect you from something that they can't reasonable prove happened.
Second, when you do business with any large operation you will not be closing the deal before you sign a "no verbal promises" document. This clearly states that you were not promised anything that does not appear in the documents you are signing. You made no verbal agreements with any employee, and you agree that the contract your are signing is the only binding legal agreement involved in this transaction. Basically, you just signed a waiver to any "liar law" your state may have on the books.
unfortunately, the bottom line is that "liar laws" look nice, and they are real useful political tool. "look what I did to protect our great citizens, blah, blah, blah....." But assuming that they bring a level of integrity to this situation, or provide any level of protection, isn't too realistic.
Dec-24-2013 10:25 AM
Dec-24-2013 04:16 AM
dougrainer wrote:
Depending on the state laws(the law where you buy, not where you live), IF you ask a Dealer (even a private seller) a specific question about the condition or circumstances of the vehicle and he LIES to you, he can be sued(very easily).Doug
Dec-24-2013 03:37 AM
wnytaxman wrote:
The reason I bring this up is that most of the issues mentioned in It was mentioned that the rig may have been totaled out in an accident. Here in NY we have a title law that requires any unit that has been totaled to have a salvage title which is noted right on the title. A quick look at the title itself would answer that question. If the sales people at Colton refuse to show you the title then you may have the answer to that question very quickly.
.
Dec-23-2013 10:30 PM
Howlan wrote:
The dealer (Colton RV in Buffalo area) told me there were no issues with the unit and it looked brand new. I was wondering why the mileage was so low and asked about that. Dealer said when I go there if I wasn't happy I could walk away from deal, so I put deposit down on unit to hold.
Dec-23-2013 08:53 PM
Dec-23-2013 06:50 PM
RWjSIM2003 wrote:
IMOP I would think twice just because the MH you are talking about is used and Model and brand has a history of many maintance issues. Might want to look for a different option. Old saying if it seems to good to be true it usually is.
My own personal impression I would never buy a RV of any type from CW.
Dec-23-2013 06:37 PM
Dec-23-2013 05:29 PM
Dec-23-2013 04:51 PM