โApr-05-2020 12:13 AM
โApr-08-2020 11:35 AM
wnjj wrote:fj12ryder wrote:
I don't know about in Oregon, but they are not testing everyone with symptoms here in Missouri. Peggy has talked to several friends who were denied testing because they weren't sick enough. So it's pretty obvious the number of people who would test positive are much higher than the numbers that are given.
Definitely not testing everyone here...far from it.
Here's one guy's opinion with supporting data as to why laundromats (on topic) and everything else should be opened back up:
https://www.professorhinkley.com/blog/why-is-oregon-still-on-lock-down
โApr-07-2020 12:28 AM
โApr-06-2020 10:16 PM
fj12ryder wrote:
I don't know about in Oregon, but they are not testing everyone with symptoms here in Missouri. Peggy has talked to several friends who were denied testing because they weren't sick enough. So it's pretty obvious the number of people who would test positive are much higher than the numbers that are given.
โApr-06-2020 02:19 PM
Cummins12V98 wrote:Well, yes the fatality rate would be correspondingly lower if the number of people who would actually test positive were in fact tested. The numbers at this point are pretty speculative considering how many people there are, how many have been tested, what the testing accuracy is, and number of tests kits there are available. Many, many variables in the whole equation.fj12ryder wrote:
I don't know about in Oregon, but they are not testing everyone with symptoms here in Missouri. Peggy has talked to several friends who were denied testing because they weren't sick enough. So it's pretty obvious the number of people who would test positive are much higher than the numbers that are given.
Making the ACTUAL death rate MUCH lower. But that may not be what some would like!
โApr-06-2020 12:38 PM
TechWriter wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
No way would you catch me in a Laundromat!!!
Now I have another reason to be happy I have had a WD for nearly 5 years.
Ditto.
โApr-06-2020 12:37 PM
fj12ryder wrote:
I don't know about in Oregon, but they are not testing everyone with symptoms here in Missouri. Peggy has talked to several friends who were denied testing because they weren't sick enough. So it's pretty obvious the number of people who would test positive are much higher than the numbers that are given.
โApr-06-2020 11:17 AM
Cummins12V98 wrote:
No way would you catch me in a Laundromat!!!
Now I have another reason to be happy I have had a WD for nearly 5 years.
โApr-06-2020 11:12 AM
โApr-06-2020 11:08 AM
wa8yxm wrote:
Laundry is an "Essential" service far as I know.
โApr-06-2020 10:53 AM
โApr-06-2020 09:55 AM
fj12ryder wrote:
"COVID19 developed in 1 (ONE) area and has spread to over 182 COUNTRIES in less than 3 months..."
So the "flu" developed simultaneously all over the world? It spread just like this virus does, but it's been around for much longer. However, the "flu" is actually comprised of several different corona viruses, which is why the "flu" shot doesn't necessarily keep you from becoming ill.
As to when it first appeared...I personally know two people who showed all the symptoms of this virus back in December/January, one of which was me. This was much different that the normal "flu" that I've had in the past. Severe upper respiratory congestion, fever, fatigue, dry coughing. It hung on for about 2 weeks. I finally went to my physician and was checked for "flu" and pneumonia. Negative for both. I never really felt awful, just coughed and felt very tired. And since we're old, we kept all the kids out of the house, and I went no where until I felt better. So I'm convinced this virus has been in the US, and elsewhere too probably, for a while. That may explain why there is this "amazingly rapid spread".
โApr-06-2020 08:00 AM
fj12ryder wrote:
"COVID19 developed in 1 (ONE) area and has spread to over 182 COUNTRIES in less than 3 months..."
So the "flu" developed simultaneously all over the world? It spread just like this virus does, but it's been around for much longer. However, the "flu" is actually comprised of several different corona viruses, which is why the "flu" shot doesn't necessarily keep you from becoming ill.
As to when it first appeared...I personally know two people who showed all the symptoms of this virus back in December/January, one of which was me. This was much different that the normal "flu" that I've had in the past. Severe upper respiratory congestion, fever, fatigue, dry coughing. It hung on for about 2 weeks. I finally went to my physician and was checked for "flu" and pneumonia. Negative for both. I never really felt awful, just coughed and felt very tired. And since we're old, we kept all the kids out of the house, and I went no where until I felt better. So I'm convinced this virus has been in the US, and elsewhere too probably, for a while. That may explain why there is this "amazingly rapid spread".
โApr-06-2020 06:35 AM
โApr-06-2020 05:14 AM
azrving wrote:
How many people have died compared to the regular flu which kills 12,000 to 60,000 a year and alcohol at 88,000 or smoking and two of those are preventable. Oh wait, those generate big tax revenue. Maybe the medicine is worse than the virus.
Virus