โApr-17-2013 04:45 AM
โJul-01-2014 08:08 PM
โJun-29-2014 09:27 PM
โJun-27-2014 06:55 AM
APT wrote:
Thank you Hybridhunter for once again singling me out. The spreadsheet screenshot is not flawed. Its application for the situations you suggest (top 2 gears) may not be relevant, but it certainly is not flawed.
Peak wheel torque for most of today's naturally aspirated V8s in full sized pickups is around 4500rpm in first gear, which is well under 130mph. Today's V8's have a fairly flat torque curve (85-90% available from 2000-5000rpm. I agree they are not as good as Ford's 3.5" Ecoboost.
Ignore wheel torque and stop at column E for torque multiplication.
If you wish to continue that discussion, please PM.
โJun-26-2014 04:05 AM
โJun-25-2014 10:22 PM
genekiwi wrote:APT wrote:
Thank you Hybridhunter for once again singling me out. The spreadsheet screenshot is not flawed. Its application for the situations you suggest (top 2 gears) may not be relevant, but it certainly is not flawed.
Peak wheel torque for most of today's naturally aspirated V8s in full sized pickups is around 4500rpm in first gear, which is well under 130mph. Today's V8's have a fairly flat torque curve (85-90% available from 2000-5000rpm. I agree they are not as good as Ford's 3.5" Ecoboost.
Ignore wheel torque and stop at column E for torque multiplication.
If you wish to continue that discussion, please PM.
Not sure what all the charting is about but jus a comment on the ecoboost.
Met a lady with a 30 foot box and about 33 foot long. Ford F150 with ecoboost. She was very happy that they were getting 5 mpg with the truck.
I'll stay with the Chevy 1500.
โJun-25-2014 07:18 PM
APT wrote:
Thank you Hybridhunter for once again singling me out. The spreadsheet screenshot is not flawed. Its application for the situations you suggest (top 2 gears) may not be relevant, but it certainly is not flawed.
Peak wheel torque for most of today's naturally aspirated V8s in full sized pickups is around 4500rpm in first gear, which is well under 130mph. Today's V8's have a fairly flat torque curve (85-90% available from 2000-5000rpm. I agree they are not as good as Ford's 3.5" Ecoboost.
Ignore wheel torque and stop at column E for torque multiplication.
If you wish to continue that discussion, please PM.
โJun-24-2014 12:43 PM
โJun-24-2014 10:59 AM
โJun-24-2014 07:51 AM
โJun-23-2014 04:29 PM
APT wrote:
Fine, here you go. Still not as good as that little V6 and higher engine speed. Exhaust sounds far better, though!
But you are right, the 6.2L/3.73 provides significant power improvements over the 5.3L/3.42, about 35%.
โJun-23-2014 07:30 AM
โJun-14-2014 03:24 PM
โJun-14-2014 02:58 PM
โOct-01-2013 11:30 AM