Nov-27-2017 02:17 PM
Nov-28-2017 09:49 AM
Nov-28-2017 07:13 AM
Nov-28-2017 07:03 AM
Nov-28-2017 06:10 AM
Nov-28-2017 06:09 AM
GrandpaKip wrote:
Having had both, I prefer uncovered. We don’t camp in cold weather, so heat and insulation don’t matter.
Nov-28-2017 05:32 AM
Nov-28-2017 04:42 AM
Nov-28-2017 01:08 AM
Nov-27-2017 09:09 PM
LAJMINNIEPLUS wrote:
Also with the covered underbelly, the manufacturers take less time in cutting penetrations through the floor because the underbelly will cover the large holes. Without the underbelly, holes for pipes are the size of the pipes. With an underbelly, holes are cut much larger than the pipes and are great areas for mice to travel at ease up from the underbelly. It looks like most holes are cut randomly with saber saws and are just about any shape imaginable. Also, no need to clean up any sawdust or debris because it will all be out of sight.
Nov-27-2017 04:08 PM
Nov-27-2017 03:32 PM
Nov-27-2017 03:27 PM
Nov-27-2017 03:20 PM
Nov-27-2017 03:05 PM
Sandia Man wrote:
Like anything there are pros and cons to either choice. For your described style of camping it's possible that an open underbelly will suit you just fine, but don't expect to do any extended camping in temps below freezing should you decide on this route. Have spent much time on business and also have family in the DFW area, it sure can get cold in a hurry when the occasional winter storm blows through.
I have had open underbelly rigs and have done mods to insulate the water lines in order to camp below freezing, been lucky thus far not to experience any adverse affects to our water delivery system due to freezing. I would more than likely go with a covered/heated underbelly in our next rig. Hope you have many wonderful times in your new RV.