cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Nash 25C or Lance 2185 Travel Trailer?

marykays1
Explorer
Explorer
Well, we've narrowed our search for a four-season TT that has bunks for our kids and are trying to decide betw the Nash 25C or the Lance 2185.

It almost seems that Nash "copied" the Lance as the Nash 25C just came out and Lance has been making the similar floorplan for a couple yrs - I think since 2011? or 2012?

We like the lightweight aluminum-frame construction of the Lance over the wood construction of the Nash.

However, there is more storage/wardrobe space in the Nash, with a larger counter in the kitchen, and I like the style of it better. I'm a "foodie" and one of the main reasons I like to "bring my kitchen along via a travel trailer" is so that I can prepare wholesome meals without eating junk/spending lots of $$$ in restaurants.

The new Nash could be bought for probably about $8000 cheaper too.

Any comments or ideas?

Thanks for all your help in the past.

Mary Kay in Ohio
92 REPLIES 92

WoodGlue
Explorer
Explorer
Mike E. wrote:
To further muddy the waters, KZ makes the a similar floorplan:

http://kz-rv.com/spree/231BHS.html

Another well made trailer that comes with a 2 year warranty.
I like the grey colour of the Nash.....sorry for my Canadian spelling...haha.

Mike


Good eye!
2002 Land Rover Discovery II
2014 Lance 1685 - Loaded - 4 Seasons - Solar - 2 AGM's
When Hell Freezes Over - I'll Camp There Too!
Lance Travel Trailer Info - Lance 1685 Travel Trailer - Lance 1575 Trailer

WoodGlue
Explorer
Explorer
One nice thing is that Lance keeps ALL their materials inside a climate controlled warehouse. Lancaster can get very cold and very hot (and sunny)

Like I was saying earlier: Heavy & Good or Light & Good

WoodGlue
2002 Land Rover Discovery II
2014 Lance 1685 - Loaded - 4 Seasons - Solar - 2 AGM's
When Hell Freezes Over - I'll Camp There Too!
Lance Travel Trailer Info - Lance 1685 Travel Trailer - Lance 1575 Trailer

Roadrash450
Explorer
Explorer
One more thing to consider, Nash prides itself on it's "in house" built off road frames. Lance subs theres out to BAL/Norco.

Nash roll over

mark1228
Explorer
Explorer
Azdel itself maybe "waterproof", however no matter what the construction of the trailer, water intrusion is your worst enemy. The Azdel won't deteriorate with water, but the glue, foam and wall panel will delaminate with water intrusion so it really doesn't matter. I have had both types of wall construction and I believe wood is a better insulator if that matters to you. The kitchen is very different and I noticed that the slide out in the lance does not have windows in the ends and appears in the pictures to not be as deep as the Nash. If you have the tow vehicle, I would go Nash

Mike_E_
Explorer II
Explorer II
To further muddy the waters, KZ makes the a similar floorplan:

http://kz-rv.com/spree/231BHS.html

Another well made trailer that comes with a 2 year warranty.
I like the grey colour of the Nash.....sorry for my Canadian spelling...haha.

Mike

Leaf-Peeper
Explorer
Explorer
Why not take a look at the owner forums for both manufacturers? Ask them what they like and dislike about their campers.

Lance Owners of America

Search results for other Lance owners


Northwood RV Owners Association Forum

Search results for other Nash owners
'05 Chevy Tahoe & ’08 Rockwood Roo 23ss
'62 Myself
'62 Camper Honey
'96 Camper Twin Girls

WoodGlue
Explorer
Explorer
Comparing Lance to Northwood Mfg products is sorta like comparing "Lil Cuties" to regular oranges as there are 2 ways of manufacturing.

Heavy and great (Nash, etc) and light and great (Lance) If you've got the tow vehicle by all means, buy the Nash, ArcticFox, etc. They're are a little harder to get into as they also ride higher.

If you've got a limited towing capacity, by all means, go for the Lance w/ it's Azdel and Lite-Ply. Azdel is a great insulator and water "damage proof"

I chose the "Lil Cutie" route as I'm towing with a short wheelbase truck (Land Rover Discovery II) although my truck has a towing capacity of 7,700lbs.

Congrats on narrowing the field down to 2 of the best TT mfgs out there in my opinion.

WoodGlue
2002 Land Rover Discovery II
2014 Lance 1685 - Loaded - 4 Seasons - Solar - 2 AGM's
When Hell Freezes Over - I'll Camp There Too!
Lance Travel Trailer Info - Lance 1685 Travel Trailer - Lance 1575 Trailer

marykays1
Explorer
Explorer
Thanks for your input jmtandem.

I've been researching and in a recent article I found it said that neither one, aluminum or wood is any "better" than the other, so long as the construction is done well. So what you are saying is really resonating with me.

I'd bet that both the Lance and the Nash utilize good construction principles.

LOL, I wish I could find a used Nash 25C and save some money but they've only just come out with them. I thought I could find a used Lance 2185, but so far most have been sold and they were close in price to a new Nash 25C.

Mary Kay

n7bsn
Explorer
Explorer
We have had an RV port since 2000, a little discussed fact about RVs, they are not designed to be parked in the weather, unheated 24/7-350 and only used 15 days a year (which is about what most owners use them)
It's like a car, any car lasts longer if it is garaged then if it is parked on the street.

FYI, some Nash units are AL framed, some have AL siding rather then FILON, some have heated tanks, some don't...it just depends on the model and year
2008 F350SD V10 with an 2012 Arctic Fox 29-5E
When someone tells you to buy the same rig they own, listen, they might be right. When they tell you to buy a different rig then they own, really pay attention, they probably know something you don't.

jmtandem
Explorer II
Explorer II
We like the lightweight aluminum-frame construction of the Lance over the wood construction of the Nash.



There is absolutely nothing wrong with wood construction. Actually it insulates better than aluminum and handles corner stresses without cracking. While the Nash is heavier it is due to the beefier frame and inside appointments, not because it is a wood frame. Just because something is aluminum framed does not mean it is better or lighter.
'05 Dodge Cummins 4x4 dually 3500 white quadcab auto long bed.

marykays1
Explorer
Explorer
RVCrazy, thanks for your candor!

Padlin, it's not only because of counter space, it's also because of the cupboards that go under it, including a pantry.....but thanks for reminding me about the foldout counter.

Thanks to all!!! Keep 'em coming!

Mary Kay

marykays1
Explorer
Explorer
Wow! What a quick response! n7bsn, thanks for telling me about yours. Can you tell me if you've stored it inside during the winters? Has it been outside in the weather the whole time?

Again, thanks!

Mary Kay

Padlin
Explorer
Explorer
They are both good trailers, if you like the Nash better, go that way.

Nash is 3' longer and looks like it has more counter space but I ses a fold up extension on the Lance, the Nash also has the baby queen. Can't tell from the floorplan but I thought all the Lances came with a real queen if it matters to you.

Lance is pretty new to the TT side of things but as Woodglue mentioned, they've made TC's for a long time. Northwoods makes both and isn't a rookie either.
Happy Motoring
Bob & Deb

W Ma.
12 F150 HD SCAB EcoBoost LB 4x4
14 Escape 5.0 TA

WoodGlue
Explorer
Explorer
Just thought I'd throw in the Lance has been manufacturing Truck Campers since 1965, so you might want to hang out in the Truck Camper section to see brand loyalty.

The Truck Campers and Trailers are made almost exactly the same way these days too!

WoodGlue
2002 Land Rover Discovery II
2014 Lance 1685 - Loaded - 4 Seasons - Solar - 2 AGM's
When Hell Freezes Over - I'll Camp There Too!
Lance Travel Trailer Info - Lance 1685 Travel Trailer - Lance 1575 Trailer

jmtandem
Explorer II
Explorer II
If I was faced with the same decision, I would get the Nash.
'05 Dodge Cummins 4x4 dually 3500 white quadcab auto long bed.