โNov-14-2018 10:38 AM
โNov-16-2018 08:20 AM
mellow wrote:Sango wrote:
Ours has a vin number. Posted on back by ladder.
Probably says Vehicle Serial No.
โNov-16-2018 08:17 AM
โNov-16-2018 08:11 AM
jimh425 wrote:
Naw, it's just that people lump all TCs together. The jack issue could be solved by just saying you canโt unload.
I donโt buy that a TC canโt be moved either by a tractor either. If it is truly an โemergencyโ who cares if it is damaged or not. More likely an imaginary event. :D. Again, Iโm fine with excluding TCs if you want, but donโt try to make up excuses. To me, itโs like a friend who said the only real RVs were Class As.
As far as wind goes, my TC has ridden out 80 mph winds on the jack legs. 4000 lbs in a short length is very heavy compared to surface area. That includes virtually any travel trailer, for sure.
โNov-16-2018 07:57 AM
Sango wrote:
Ours has a vin number. Posted on back by ladder.
โNov-16-2018 07:46 AM
valhalla360 wrote:
Pull a truck camper...first, there is no place to latch on and pull but even if you did, the jacks will likly rip off and then it will be dragging on it's bottom. A couple hundred feet and it may be a total loss.
westernrvparkowner wrote:
Giving the reason or explanation for any rule or policy is a fool's errand. It took exactly two posts from the time so one gave the published reasoning behind a policy before someone chimed in with their own conflicting theory. Mom actually had the best reason ever when questioning a rule. That answer was "Because I said so".
โNov-16-2018 07:29 AM
Ralph Cramden wrote:Thank you for proving an important point. Giving the reason or explanation for any rule or policy is a fool's errand. It took exactly two posts from the time so one gave the published reasoning behind a policy before someone chimed in with their own conflicting theory. Mom actually had the best reason ever when questioning a rule. That answer was "Because I said so".toedtoes wrote:
Unjustifiably denying access to specific RVs could create a very negative public backlash.
Fishing Bridge doesn't allow soft-sided RVs due to bear activity.
Having seen that on the website and read about it at least 100 times over the years on boards, I often wonder the real reason. Bay Bridge Campground is less than 4 miles away as the crow flies, but it does not have bear activity? Possibly the Yellowstone Brownies don't have the free ranging habits of others in the tens of square miles.
I suspect it has more to do with the place being called "RV Park" and being operated by a Concessionaire.
โNov-16-2018 07:21 AM
โNov-16-2018 06:35 AM
โNov-16-2018 06:31 AM
Maybe washing your combo more often would help?
Maybe changing the attitude?
โNov-16-2018 05:14 AM
DutchmenSport wrote:
It would be hard to yank out my 5er. With auto self-leveling jacks and 4 slides, before moving, all that would need to be retracted. If the doors are locked, good luck moving it, unless you destroy the front door and destroy the bay hatch to reach the self-leveler controls!
โNov-15-2018 09:37 PM
โNov-15-2018 08:59 PM
โNov-15-2018 03:57 PM
โNov-15-2018 02:16 PM
Ralph Cramden wrote:toedtoes wrote:
Unjustifiably denying access to specific RVs could create a very negative public backlash.
Fishing Bridge doesn't allow soft-sided RVs due to bear activity.
Having seen that on the website and read about it at least 100 times over the years on boards, I often wonder the real reason. Bay Bridge Campground is less than 4 miles away as the crow flies, but it does not have bear activity? Possibly the Yellowstone Brownies don't have the free ranging habits of others in the tens of square miles.
I suspect it has more to do with the place being called "RV Park" and being operated by a Concessionaire.
โNov-15-2018 01:01 PM
toedtoes wrote:
Unjustifiably denying access to specific RVs could create a very negative public backlash.
Fishing Bridge doesn't allow soft-sided RVs due to bear activity.