โFeb-03-2017 10:10 AM
โFeb-05-2017 06:36 AM
SoundGuy wrote:GrandpaKip wrote:
Having had both, I can't really say which is better. They both do the job well. The plug was easier than the rod for sure, but I wouldn't change it out to save a few minutes and 10 bucks a year.
Heck, even if the existing water heater was pooched I wouldn't arbitrarily change to a different brand and as a result create all sorts of work to make the darned thing fit. Talk about a "make work" project. :R
โFeb-04-2017 07:15 AM
GrandpaKip wrote:
Having had both, I can't really say which is better. They both do the job well. The plug was easier than the rod for sure, but I wouldn't change it out to save a few minutes and 10 bucks a year.
โFeb-04-2017 06:14 AM
โFeb-04-2017 04:14 AM
โFeb-03-2017 11:44 PM
old guy wrote:
now this is my opinion and I have worked on both and I would take a suburban over an atwood any day. easier to work on and the parts are cheaper. the plastic plug is about the only advantage the atwood has and that is not all that much to write home about
โFeb-03-2017 09:30 PM
โFeb-03-2017 07:20 PM
โFeb-03-2017 07:07 PM
โFeb-03-2017 05:54 PM
MFL wrote:
They are both good WHs, but too big of a job IMO, to switch from one to the other. I get a new rod every year, to 18 months, no big deal. If your rod does not last a year, you may want to consider aluminum replacement rods.
Jerry
โFeb-03-2017 01:23 PM
โFeb-03-2017 12:35 PM
donn0128 wrote:
Why not simply install another Suburban?
โFeb-03-2017 10:42 AM
boulderado wrote:
Does anyone know if a 6 gallon Suburban water heater can be replaced with an Atwood without too many modifications?
โFeb-03-2017 10:38 AM