cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Hitch weight ?

Gebrown
Explorer
Explorer
As I research Toy Haulers I've noticed some have higher hitch weights than others that weigh less. Why the variance and how much of a role does that play when shopping for a TH?
For example:

KZ MXT 303
Hitch weight - 980
UVW - 6350

KZ MXT 309
Hitch Weight - 6770
UVW - 900

Coachmen 301 BLDS
Hitch Weight - 950
UVW - 6459
10 REPLIES 10

Bedlam
Moderator
Moderator
My shorter FB2200 Weekend Warrior was like yours in regards to tongue weight change due to the axles pushed farther back on the frame. For a long time, I couldn't figure out why travel trailers could pivot tighter than me even though they were longer until I looked closer at the wheelbase length to the tongue and realized most TT's have their axles at mid point and while TH's have them about 2/3 to 3/4 of the length back. My TW was not nearly as heavy as yours even though we had the same tank capacities because my underside was almost filled front to back with waste, fresh and fuel tanks putting more over or behind the axle than yours.

Host Mammoth 11.5 on Ram 5500 HD

allcool
Explorer
Explorer
2500 Grunt wrote:
Not all toy haulers are as stated above. My TW does not change at all with my 1400# sand rail in mine. I use a Sherline scale for mine and that is what I found out.


I also have used the Sherline scale, and find the same results as you.
On my TH with a RZR loaded with rear wheels almost up against the ramp door, and 2 quads loaded, the TW decreases approximately 50 lbs. Now add full water tanks (160gal) and total TW increases approximately 100lbs. Not much change considering the TW is always over 2000 lb.

The rearward axle placement in most all TH's, will not let you get much weight far behind the axles, percentage wise. The weight that you can get behind the axles, with not much leverage(distance behind axles) does little to counter the very large amount of weight with lots of distance in front of axles,(lots of leverage).

jmo
2007 WW FSW3200
RZRS k&t Turbo
2 LT500
1 Lt500 hybrid
F350 CC 6.7PS Platinum

2500_Grunt
Explorer
Explorer
Not all toy haulers are as stated above. My TW does not change at all with my 1400# sand rail in mine. I use a Sherline scale for mine and that is what I found out.
2005 Dodge 2500 5.9 SRW long bed
2014 FS28 Evergreen Amped TH Blue Ox 2000# WDH
2300CC VW turbo 4 seat sandrail, Yz450f, 350 Raptor quad

Sandia_Man
Explorer II
Explorer II
Normal for toyhaulers to have a higher percentage of their total weight on the hitch ball than regular TTs as loaded toys/gear in the rear will alleviate a portion of tongue weight. Traveling without toys greatly intensifies this issue, it's important to make sure your TV's hitch receiver is up to the task. I do like the KZ MXT toyhaulers and they are relatively light for their size, they appear to offer a good value for the price.

Strabo
Explorer
Explorer
Howdy...

Buy whatever you like and tow the dam thing.

Have fun, be safe..Enjoy!!!
04' F350 PSD TB SC FX4 XLT, TH-04' 32' Sandpiper Sport Fifthwheel WB Dual Axle
07' Rhino 686 SS106-ITP-AFE-BRP-T4-CDI-KIBBLEBWHITE-CVT-TSTICH-Ridgid LED LightBar-HID Conversion Kit-LIVEWIRE
04' Honda 250 Sportstrac quad
05' Honda 400 Ranchers quad

Racerx11
Explorer
Explorer
Bedlam wrote:
Just wait until you fill the tanks - Most TH's have over 1000 lbs tongue weight. My OEM 12.5K lb receiver was just barely adequate for my 11.5K lb GVWR Weekend Warrior FB2200 TH.

Indeed!

Bedlam
Moderator
Moderator
Just wait until you fill the tanks - Most TH's have over 1000 lbs tongue weight. My OEM 12.5K lb receiver was just barely adequate for my 11.5K lb GVWR Weekend Warrior FB2200 TH.

Host Mammoth 11.5 on Ram 5500 HD

Old-Biscuit
Explorer III
Explorer III
bumper pull.......10-15% of trailer GVWR for tongue weight
5th wheel.........15-25% of trailer GVWR for pin weight


Are your posted numbers (900/950/980) 'dry' weight numbers published by mfg.?
I suspect they are as you have only posted 'dry' trailer weights.

Trailer loaded up camp ready........weights will be much higher. That is why you guesstimate tongue/hitch weight by using the % of GVWR so that you can match it to what your tow vehicle actual payload capacity can handle
Payload-------tow vehicles GVWR minus actual camp ready weight, paying particular attention to rear axle/tire load capacities.
Is it time for your medication or mine?


2007 DODGE 3500 QC SRW 5.9L CTD In-Bed 'quiet gen'
2007 HitchHiker II 32.5 UKTG 2000W Xantex Inverter
US NAVY------USS Decatur DDG31

Y-Guy
Moderator
Moderator
Toy Haulers always have a very high hitch weight. While many standard travel trailers & 5th wheels say 10-15% a toy hauler can easily be 15-20+%. There is some (small) amount of counterbalance when you load things behind the wheels, but on a triple axle that will be limited. Key is to make sure your truck can handle it and that your hitch can handle it. Numbers are often wrong so you're only real way to know is to have it weighed.

Two Wire Fox Terriers; Sarge & Sully

2007 Winnebago Sightseer 35J

2020 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon

lawrosa
Explorer
Explorer
From your posting, 900 to 980 lbs is not much of a variance IMO..

Its all on the options that make the weights different.. ie: King bed vs queen bed in front, Configuration of dressers or nightstands, overhead cabinets, slides....etc...

80 lbs one way or another should not make a difference with regards to tow vehicle or shopping if your looking in the 1000 lbs range of tongue weight.. If it does then you have other issues with regards to payload capacity.....
Mike L ... N.J.

2006 Silverado ext cab long bed. 3:42 rear. LM7 5.3 motor. 300 hp 350 ft lbs torgue @ 4000 rpms
2018 coachmen Catalina sbx 261bh