May-27-2013 07:38 PM
May-28-2013 03:38 PM
May-28-2013 02:50 PM
ChopperBill wrote:
Went from truck campers to a 34' FW, then a 40' FW and now have the sig brand that comes in under 32'and feel a lot more comfortable pulling it. The floor plan in the present one makes it feel as roomy as the 40 footer. Wish I would have hung onto one of the TC's for weekend trips to the mountains. Bigger aint always better for everyone.
May-28-2013 02:29 PM
May-28-2013 02:28 PM
May-28-2013 02:19 PM
May-28-2013 02:10 PM
May-28-2013 02:07 PM
May-28-2013 01:57 PM
joebedford wrote:Acei wrote:Mildly curious why you think hiking and photography and RV resorts are mutually exclusive?? Unless you're seriously into boondocking (which you aren't because then you wouldn't asking about maximum length in parks) I think you'd be making a mistake staying away from RV resorts.
We are the type who likes to hike a lot and I like taking pictures as well. I doubt we will ever go to resort type of places.
Imagine passing up a really nice 34' 5er and picking a 28' RV to fit into provincial parks when you could have stayed 5km down the road in a nice RV park. You don't HAVE to go to bingo if you don't want to.
But then I'm biased - mine's 42'6" 🙂
May-28-2013 01:52 PM
May-28-2013 01:40 PM
Acei wrote:Mildly curious why you think hiking and photography and RV resorts are mutually exclusive?? Unless you're seriously into boondocking (which you aren't because then you wouldn't asking about maximum length in parks) I think you'd be making a mistake staying away from RV resorts.
We are the type who likes to hike a lot and I like taking pictures as well. I doubt we will ever go to resort type of places.
May-28-2013 11:58 AM
May-28-2013 10:35 AM
May-28-2013 09:07 AM
May-28-2013 05:41 AM
May-28-2013 04:39 AM