โJan-22-2016 06:27 AM
โJan-25-2016 08:34 AM
โJan-25-2016 05:05 AM
jerseyjim wrote:
Safety/crashes: Been RVing since the early 80's. Pickup truck/TT. (3) Now...a motorhome (for my retirement and probably my last RV) pulling a toad 4dwn.
I don't think anybody buys any RV with "safety" in mind. It's really buy what you want, buy what you can afford and buy what you think would serve your needs best.
EVERYTHING has wrecks: airplanes, buses, cars, motorcycles, and RVs of any kind. Even slipping in your own bathtub. So...stop this worry (paranoia?) about the very small chance (of crashing) and what you cannot control and live a little bit!
(When I took out insurance for the first time on my then-brand new motorhome, I was astounded as to how cheap it was...compared to my car insurance. Agent said...it was all in the numbers. Motorhome people do not wreck 'em.)
holstein13 wrote:Kayteg1 wrote:You do realize this is the rear of a class A don't you. I would be very surprised to find a passenger cage at the rear of a class A.
You need to learn to see what is important.
No matter how nasty the above pictures look, please notice that in all those crash vehicles passenger cage is mostly intake.
Bus passengers don't use seat belts and that sometimes bring fatality, but I would be not surprised if from all those accidents people walk away.
Now observe how much passenger cage holds on average ClassA.
I get your point, however. Just think you could have found a better photo to illustrate it.
โJan-24-2016 06:41 AM
Kayteg1 wrote:You do realize this is the rear of a class A don't you. I would be very surprised to find a passenger cage at the rear of a class A.
You need to learn to see what is important.
No matter how nasty the above pictures look, please notice that in all those crash vehicles passenger cage is mostly intake.
Bus passengers don't use seat belts and that sometimes bring fatality, but I would be not surprised if from all those accidents people walk away.
Now observe how much passenger cage holds on average ClassA.
โJan-24-2016 06:36 AM
2gypsies wrote:Yes, this one should probably be removed. I wrote it here first before I realized that I might get skewed results from posting in a "Class A" forum. I then decided to post it in General RV to see if I'd get more neutral results.
OP: This is a duplicate post. You also have one going in the General RVing section.
โJan-23-2016 05:11 AM
โJan-23-2016 03:19 AM
โJan-23-2016 02:27 AM
Bruce Brown wrote:
We own both a PU/TT combo and a MH. I can tell you as far as traveling goes I **MUCH** prefer the MH and feel I'm in a lot better control.
And for the record, my truck is a '16 Super Duty diesel, our TT is a 33' Dutchman, and it is properly attached with the best Reese antisway, load leveling hitch money can buy.
โJan-22-2016 10:02 PM
โJan-22-2016 08:17 PM
โJan-22-2016 07:39 PM
โJan-22-2016 06:56 PM
โJan-22-2016 12:57 PM
Dale.Traveling wrote:I think your photos will cause more worry.
At highway speeds it really doesn't matter what your in, car, pick up, budget RV or a bus. Its going to be ugly and people are going to get hurt or worse.
There are risks and hazards with everything we do every day. We each can decide for ourselves what our tolerance is and how we choose to limit exposure. Now stop worrying and go camping (well maybe after the snow melts).
โJan-22-2016 12:18 PM
โJan-22-2016 11:53 AM
โJan-22-2016 08:31 AM