โMar-23-2015 10:29 AM
โMar-26-2015 02:32 PM
All I could afford wrote:
As a guy who owns and over 10 year old trailer which is in visually perfect condition, i'd like to offer the opinion that I wouldn't be offended if I Campground had a policy such as "all RVs and trailers must be in a reasonably presentable condition, to be determined by the management. But a blanket restriction based only on age seems silly and not in the spirit of camaraderie I come to expect when camping
โMar-26-2015 02:16 PM
โMar-26-2015 01:29 PM
โMar-26-2015 12:55 PM
westernrvparkowner wrote:
I notice that you said the only parks you didn't stay at were parks with derelict rigs but were seedy in other ways. Since you didn't stay, what other ways were they seedy? And don't you think there is a correlation between derelict rigs and seedy parks? And what percentage of those derelict rigs were less than 10 years old? My guess, pretty close to zero. My parks are definitely not seedy, and they don't accept derelict rigs. I feel that those things are pretty much joined at the hip.
โMar-26-2015 10:52 AM
โMar-26-2015 10:52 AM
โMar-26-2015 10:46 AM
BurbMan wrote:I don't believe a veteran camper, or even a veteran, is a protected class. And every business has "unposted" policies. Even if I don't post a dress code, I can surely turn away a nude customer, even if they are Black, Hispanic, Buddhist or whatever. RV rigs are surely not a protected class, I can turn away any that want, without any repercussions. As I said before, keeping a clean, neat attractive RV park is good business. If Jed and all his Kin were to arrive looking for a spot, I would send them down the road with his Million Dollars still firmly attached to his wallet. (Unless Ellie Mae (the 20 something version), promised to spend the entire stay at the Cement Pond, since that would more than balance out the truck)the bear II wrote:
Usually the management will accept a few photos or video of your RV and of anyone who will be staying in your RV. They will make a decision to allow or not. We've had to send photos twice and were allowed to stay each time.
You're kidding right?
I have never been asked how old my rig is, only what kind and how long it is. I have never had anybody inspect my rig upon check in (well, maybe somebody has without me knowing it when I am in the office doing paperwork). Anybody who wants to know how old I am, how old my rig is, or asks for a picture of anything, can rent that site to someone else.
It may be within the CG owner's rights, but 1) that doesn't make it right, and 2) doesn't make it good business.
It's very dangerous, IMO, for ANY business to have "unposted" policies, because anybody knows that's just a smokescreen for discrimination. All it takes is one minority or disabled or veteran camper to be turned away by the CG owner claiming some unposted rule about the age of his rig, and a sharp attorney, and that camper will wind up owning that CG.
โMar-26-2015 09:49 AM
daytona7 wrote:
There were a couple of RV parks here in the Lakeland, FL area that also had age limits on the RV's. One park even turned away a 15 year Prevost that looked better than a new one. Thank goodness that one is now closed and replaced by a shopping center and the other one now has new management. The real kicker is that both parks had a few Old (like 20+ years) Travel Trailers sitting on blocks further in the back that were occupied.
โMar-26-2015 09:47 AM
โMar-26-2015 09:40 AM
โMar-26-2015 09:35 AM
the bear II wrote:
Usually the management will accept a few photos or video of your RV and of anyone who will be staying in your RV. They will make a decision to allow or not. We've had to send photos twice and were allowed to stay each time.
โMar-26-2015 09:04 AM
addisonl wrote:They turn them away because vintage, restored rigs are the exception to the rule. You can thank the internet. If a park gets bad marks on the review sites, it will suffer much more than the cost of turning away a "vintage" Airstream. Read the bad reviews. A top three reason is for bad reviews is "the park is full of junky rigs". Keeping a park looking good is imperative if you want good reviews. We don't have a problem with derelict rigs (most likely because our prices and the fact we do not allow long term stays weed them out to begin with), so we don't need that policy, but I can sure understand why other parks do.
I haven't been turned away yet but I almost wish I was so it would be fun to sometimes ask things back. Like how old are your hookups? How old are your shower heads? How old is that huge rut and bump and I have to drive over? How old is the stained coffee pot in your fancy lounge? ๐
And now with the pricey Airstream vans and others or beautiful old mint/restored rigs, why would a business turn those away?
I kind of wish all the people in these posts that vaguely mention places that had the age rule would post the name of the place. I could make some notes in my notebook.
โMar-26-2015 08:22 AM
โMar-26-2015 07:18 AM
โMar-26-2015 05:58 AM
daytona7 wrote:
There were a couple of RV parks here in the Lakeland, FL area that also had age limits on the RV's. One park even turned away a 15 year Prevost that looked better than a new one. Thank goodness that one is now closed and replaced by a shopping center and the other one now has new management. The real kicker is that both parks had a few Old (like 20+ years) Travel Trailers sitting on blocks further in the back that were occupied.