โMay-19-2013 03:56 PM
โMay-21-2013 06:08 PM
wa8yxm wrote:
Here is one for you.> NATIONWIDE
Both Michigan and South Carolina, where my wife crashed our brand new used JEEP, totaling both the car and herself. Have laws that are much alike.
IF you own an automobile, and it is insured, that insurance covers a new purchase for a period of days to enable you to properly insure it, it also covers rentals.
Guess what. Nationwide tells me that my RV's policy did NOT cover that 4 day old JEEP (2 business days).
Right.. Oh Mr, Insurance Regulatory Commissioner... Will be writing that letter soon as some more dust settles.
โMay-21-2013 04:28 PM
โMay-21-2013 12:43 PM
โMay-21-2013 10:36 AM
โMay-21-2013 08:50 AM
โMay-21-2013 04:02 AM
pnichols wrote:
Instead of picking apart the OP's usage of the word "scam" and telling him how to better read his Progressive RV insurance policy, why don't some of you chime in with suggestions as to better RV insurance companies for the OP to check into that have coverage with higher personal effects coverage limits.
โMay-21-2013 03:59 AM
powderman426 wrote:
Tough crowd here Surfride, but I tend to go with you on this one. If its not scamming, it sure is intentionally misleading if it states in the declaration "Replecement value for personal effects, and then in another sections stating a $500 limit. But hey if people here enjoy getting ripped, who am I to complain. So thank you for the heads up.
BTW I think an attorney would have a field day with this one.
โMay-21-2013 02:35 AM
pnichols wrote:
Instead of picking apart the OP's usage of the word "scam" and telling him how to better read his Progressive RV insurance policy, why don't some of you chime in with suggestions as to better RV insurance companies for the OP to check into that have coverage with higher personal effects coverage limits.
โMay-21-2013 02:11 AM
โMay-20-2013 09:17 PM
โMay-20-2013 08:41 PM
peaches&cream wrote:Goostoff wrote:
Many many years ago in Chicago there was this certain group of people that would walk into the local businesses and tell them they had to pay for protection. Eventually there were charges of racketeering, profiteering, and extortion.
Now they just simply call this legalized extortion, insurance, and the mob is now simply agents, and on the other side you have the scumbag lawyers that are responsible for the extremely high rates we all pay and all the stupid little clauses written in the fine print
Great thing about today's rules is "you do not have to purchase" the coverage you "hate" so bad. Just save your money and pay "cash" for everything. No one will be shaking you down making you purchase "protection" you don't want. I bet you would "gripe" if all the Ins. Co. went out of business or better yet, "refuse to write coverage for you" yet Insure your neighbor? Also, all policies are written in "plain language". If you cannot understand it, ask any 10 yr. old and they can explain it to you. 21 yrs. of P&C Ins. Sales fuels my post.
โMay-20-2013 05:46 PM
โMay-20-2013 04:40 PM
Popsie wrote:
if it says "Replacement Cost Personal Effects Coverage" up front on the first page, and the $500 limit is hidden on page 35, then it seems to me that they are trying to mislead the buyer.
โMay-20-2013 11:17 AM