โSep-16-2014 03:35 PM
โSep-18-2014 01:02 PM
โSep-17-2014 07:06 PM
Mr.Mark wrote:
Toedtoes, I think you hit the nail on the head. You are covered by your insurance but the insurance on the car is the first carrier then onto yours if needed.
My info comes from our TN insurance as they basically stated that the insurance follows the car.
MM.
โSep-17-2014 06:36 PM
โSep-17-2014 06:13 PM
โSep-17-2014 05:26 PM
โSep-17-2014 04:51 PM
โSep-17-2014 04:06 PM
toedtoes wrote:spud1957 wrote:
I asked this specific question to my agent about letting someone not living in my household drive my vehicle. She said in the event the driver CAUSES an accident, I have complete coverage BUT the fault of the accident will be marked against me (6 years) if/and any related rate increases would be against me.
These would be Canadian insurance regulations.
S
This is where it gets tricky. Depending on who reports the accident and to whose insurance company, the marks (and rate increase) could hit either or both (driver and/or vehicle owner). With my insurance, if a friend drives my vehicle, is in an accident, and I report it to my insurance, they will pay out and I will see the effects of that claim. They likely will go after the friend's insurance to get reimbursed (in which case, the friend will see the effects of that claim also). If I am driving a friend's vehicle and am in an accident, my insurance will pay out. They will likely not go after the vehicle owner's insurance. Only I will see the effects of the claim.
โSep-17-2014 03:26 PM
spud1957 wrote:
I asked this specific question to my agent about letting someone not living in my household drive my vehicle. She said in the event the driver CAUSES an accident, I have complete coverage BUT the fault of the accident will be marked against me (6 years) if/and any related rate increases would be against me.
These would be Canadian insurance regulations.
S
โSep-17-2014 10:34 AM
โSep-17-2014 09:09 AM
โSep-17-2014 06:40 AM
โSep-16-2014 11:58 PM
โSep-16-2014 08:56 PM
โSep-16-2014 06:34 PM