cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Ethanol Gasoline Emissions Study I SMELL A RAT

MEXICOWANDERER
Explorer
Explorer
I have been trying to locate a laboratory grade emissions study report listing ANY AND ALL EMISSIONS as given off by the use of 100% gasoline versus various blending percentages of ethanol into gasoline. My searches have been fruitless. All I wish to know is the TYPE of emissions of combustion in quantities of 5 ppm or greater.

Various government reports steer an investigator down blind alleys, diversions, vague untraceable reference links, and unfortunately, bald hyperbole.

I am merely a forensic engineer. I need raw data to assimilate the total perspective of an issue. Not bits of a whole that add up to less than the sum if its parts.

Combustion of alcohol creates unique emissions. In combination with various hydrocarbons and esters, poly-ureas and sulfurs, the potential to end up with nightmarish frankenemissions is formidable.

Can any forum participant point me in the correct direction in which a comprehensive ANALYSIS may be read and studied to determine the effects of hydrocarbon ethanol combustion? Not merely the rote CO, CO2, NOX, litany, but analysis of total combustions emissions?

You can make your own conclusions as to what I am "Driving At"

Exempt, the point of crude oil conservation. This year the USA begins the export of USA light sweet fracturing crude to China.
66 REPLIES 66

MM49
Explorer
Explorer
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
Rockhillmanor, please come ride with me when I come to the EUA and you can help financially and with the reduction of fuel economy in my car when it drops from 28 to 24 mpg, and the engine stalls repeatedly after starting. This is a lot like buying "Hamburger" then finding out when it tastes awful that a substantial portion of the beef is pork fat, and ground bones and hooves.

Lord help the poor RV'er who suffers paying an extra hundred dollars or so on an extended trip for "fuel".

Mexico is purchasing 0.00 PPM azufre (sulfur) diesel from Japan and pumping it out of tankers moored offshore at Rosarito Beach, Baja California. The zero diesel is sadly only distributed in Baja California and not in Baja California Sur.

Anyone out there wanna take a guess what the sulfur count is in USA gasoline?

Leave the sulfur in, spike gasoline with alcohol and then call it "ecologically sound". Man oh man...

ON EDIT (I Tried But Failed To Resist Inserting This)

Wanna know what kind of CON JOB you folks are facing? You know about ULSD, 15 PPM, right? Now follow the bouncing ball to the link below and IMAGINE the RATIO of gasoline gallons to diesel burned daily.

And at least as far as my contributions are concerned, this has to end. I had my say and that is that... Happy Reading...

https://www.mustangeng.com/aboutmustang/publications/publications/impact.pdf
My guess is that it is to run the gererators at the big hotel in Rosarito Beach.
MM49

atreis
Explorer
Explorer
I'd guess that Matt's posting is about work done quite a while ago (he mentions catalytic converters not being required at the time), and the manufacturers' tuning specification for the engines was based on the assumption that one was burning unblended fuel - thus not likely to produce the best emissions profile when burning blended fuel. Nowadays manufacturers assume blended fuel and build and tune the engines appropriately.
2021 Four Winds 26B on Chevy 4500

Lowsuv
Explorer
Explorer
If this is a vote ADD me to the Ethanol detractors .

15 % ethanol adds to corrosion and rubber deterioration especially in engines that are run infrequently .
I almost always run 100 % gas in my boat .
My cardlock operator has offered NON ETHANOL PREMIUM for a decade or more and it is a 10-15% premium over 85 /15 .
I only buy 85 /15 on the water or in a place where I have no choice .
I added a large filter for water removal in the boat .
85/15 causes condensation in boat fuel tanks.
The science is there .
Another good reason to own a diesel pickup .

wa8yxm
Explorer III
Explorer III
Back when the only outboard choice was 2-stroke.. E-10 did not exist. E-1 or E-2 perhaps (in the winter time in the northern states if you bought Standard, My Advice Sir, Get De-Icer) but E-5,10 or 15, no way.

And I can not believe if E-15 is as bad as Mercury says, E-10 is ok.
Home was where I park it. but alas the.
2005 Damon Intruder 377 Alas declared a total loss
after a semi "nicked" it. Still have the radios
Kenwood TS-2000, ICOM ID-5100, ID-51A+2, ID-880 REF030C most times

randallb
Explorer
Explorer
As far back as I can remember, this includes the days when 2 strokes were the only OB choice, all the OB manufacturers recommended a fuel additive. 2 stroke, 4 stroke, E-0, E-10 fuel all had an additive recommendation buried in the owner's manual. Nothing has ever really changed in fuel system maintenance recommendations. My new Mercury 4 stroke manual and a tag on the engine recommended Sta-Bil. Go figure. It makes me wonder who produces Merc's additive for them. The answer to that rhetorical is whoever will make it cheapest.
Randy

wa8yxm
Explorer III
Explorer III
SaltiDawg wrote:


Not to confuse the issue with facts, but

Mercury Outboards - E10 is an acceptable fuel for use in the marine industry

Seemingly lots of politically based or agenda driven unsubstantiated material here.


Interesting link, Though the original study I referenced but did not link to (And which is mentioned in your link) contained actual research information, Findings and such Proving that E-15 (And you will note I did state E-15) Damaged the engines.. This link contains nothing of the sort, IN fact it contains absolutly NO information which pretains to this study.. Just a totally unsupported statement that E-10 is acceptable.. And some information that would apply to E-1 or E-2 which, I already stated, might be good in some cases.

No, your link is meaningless in the context of this discussion. No supporting information.
Home was where I park it. but alas the.
2005 Damon Intruder 377 Alas declared a total loss
after a semi "nicked" it. Still have the radios
Kenwood TS-2000, ICOM ID-5100, ID-51A+2, ID-880 REF030C most times

NinerBikes
Explorer
Explorer
Ethanol is an oxygenator in fuel, in gasoline. That means it helps oxidize everything it comes in contact with. To oxidize is to burn, to corrode, and to chemically react with what ever it comes in contact with. Sometimes that chemical contact is good, when it comes to the fuel actually burning, doing work, and moving you down the road. The rest of the time, that chemical contact is bad, very, very bad, for everything else in your fuel system. That it's an oxidizer makes it very, very unstable and prone to want to chemically react with everything it comes in contact with until it itself is burned and consumed.

down_home
Explorer II
Explorer II
The little black car gets about 18mpg, driven typically.
The ethanol blend kicks it down to about 15, near as I figure, according to the display. I never have 100 ethanol, in the tank so hard to pin it down exactly.
It makes the car stumble, if you are cruising and nail it. I don't like that atall. Ethanol burns hotter and that won't do valves etc any good.

bigfootford
Nomad II
Nomad II
Snake Oil?

Just search about it and see...

E85 eval from Consumer Reports

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/2011/01/the-great-ethanol-debate/index.htm

23% reduction in town driving

28% reduction Hwy.

Overall average 28% reduction!

E10

Not as big of a loss but most folks report 5-10%, some even more.

OH, our beloved EPA say's 2-3% for E10... And they told us no mileage decrease with MTBE.. Believe them or your pocket book!

Nope, not Snake Oil.

Jim
2000 2500 9.6 Bigfoot,94 F250, Vision 19.5, Bilstein shocks, air bags/pump, EU2000, PD 9260, Two Redodo 100ah Mini's, Aims 2500 Conv/Inv, 200W. solar, Morningstar Sunsaver 15A/ display panel, Delorme/laptop for travel, Wave-3 heat.

dieseltruckdriv
Explorer II
Explorer II
SaltiDawg wrote:
Denny & Jami wrote:
You can say anything you want but you won't change my mind on 10 % corn gas, I've been using it for years in all my play and work trucks(now just play trucks)with no problems. I also use it in my generators, lawn mowers and outboard motor, the last time I had any problems with a generator was with the varnish regular gas left behind. I've also left in our 01 Alero for just short of 2 years with 10% in it, it started right up and ran fine.

Denny
.


Denny,

My experience also. (Re no issues.)


Add me to this group.

I have been using ethanol based gasoline for over 25 years, because I used to be a supporter of it. I am not anymore, but my issues are with the tax break it is given, and using a food source (livestock, not people, get serious) as fuel. Let it live or die on its own, on an equal tax basis.

Yes, if I have a choice, I will now choose straight gas products, but I sure don't worry if only ethanol is available.

I get a kick out of threads like these. Methanol was VERY hard on rubber components. Too many people think ethanol is as bad. It isn't. If the engine is used regularly, you will not have a problem. If the engine sits with no use, you will have problems. Yes I have seen a decrease in fuel mileage as people have said, but I have never noticed a 10% decrease. That is snake oil talk. ๐Ÿ™‚
2000 F-250 7.3 Powerstroke
2018 Arctic Fox 27-5L

Lynnmor
Explorer
Explorer
SaltiDawg wrote:
Lynnmor wrote:


So you post an advertisement for fuel additives to cure enthanol problems. Then the ad does double-speak calling the problems myths. Please pass the Kool-Aid.


Seems you can't read. Read the Mercury study report... I could care less about the ads at the bottom... if you had any sense, you'd realize that the ads are likely placed by a bot and of course target sites that produce a positive vibe to their product.

Note the link is to mercury.com - not some product's site.

I have my doubts, but hope you can understand what is going on here... :R

Folks claim what Mercury concluded, I post a link to a presentation hat Mercury provides and you attack me because of an Ad or Ads at the bottom of the presentation.

For chrimey sakes.

EDIT: I note "Lynnmor" deleted his post - without an apology for a personal attack based on apparent (redacted.) Lynnmor - search the word on Google.


Mercury sells products, your link is an ad.
I made no personal attack.
I deleted nothing.

bigfootford
Nomad II
Nomad II
Denny & Jami wrote:
You can say anything you want but you won't change my mind on 10 % corn gas, I've been using it for years in all my play and work trucks(now just play trucks)with no problems. I also use it in my generators, lawn mowers and outboard motor, the last time I had any problems with a generator was with the varnish regular gas left behind. I've also left in our 01 Alero for just short of 2 years with 10% in it, it started right up and ran fine.

Denny
.


Good for you!

So what kind of engine does an 01 Alero have? Fuel injected engines do not suffer from the evaporation of the fuel, leaving the "syrup" residue....

As for your other engines... I too have many working engines, mowers, saws, gen's etc that have not had a problem with sitting 6 mod or so... BUT...

Just remove the float bowl and look see.....

Take a few oz of 10% ethanol gas and let it evaporate and see what you have ...
Do that with 0% ethanol gas and see what you have....

The final thing that many of us are being vocal about is the reduced performance of the ethanol'ed gas... A 10% or more reduction in performance is basely a 10% tax for us!

Jim
2000 2500 9.6 Bigfoot,94 F250, Vision 19.5, Bilstein shocks, air bags/pump, EU2000, PD 9260, Two Redodo 100ah Mini's, Aims 2500 Conv/Inv, 200W. solar, Morningstar Sunsaver 15A/ display panel, Delorme/laptop for travel, Wave-3 heat.

SaltiDawg
Explorer
Explorer
Denny & Jami wrote:
You can say anything you want but you won't change my mind on 10 % corn gas, I've been using it for years in all my play and work trucks(now just play trucks)with no problems. I also use it in my generators, lawn mowers and outboard motor, the last time I had any problems with a generator was with the varnish regular gas left behind. I've also left in our 01 Alero for just short of 2 years with 10% in it, it started right up and ran fine.

Denny
.


Denny,

My experience also. (Re no issues.)

C-Leigh_Racing
Explorer
Explorer
wa8yxm wrote:
One of my friends was an insurance man we were talking about no-booze gas.. He mentioned that small engines (Lawn mowers down here, Snow blowers and lawn mowers up north, Roto tillers in both and chain saws) many folks had gone through two or 3 motors due to alcohol in the gas.. (NOTE: I would have thought by now they would have re-designed to burn the c*** but what do I know).

Likewise Mercury Outboards did a test with E-15 as I recall Rane something like 3 pair of engines for 300 hours on both E-0 and E-15.. All but one of the E-15 engines, at the end of the test, showed increased damage from the fuel.. The one remaining E-15 engine failed before the test was over and again, it was due to the effects of the fuel.. This study has been linked to several times in these forums in the past.

NO, E-anything over 5% is bad news. Of this I'm convinced.

And I'm the guy who brought up mr. Pryor's Pyre (And my own I might add).


Thats a big 10/4, I know it to be a fact on small engines, many years as I did repairs on them.
95% of the repairs I did to small engine, was fuel related problems. Gummed up or ate up carbs & tanks, stuck valves & quite a bit of complete engine rebuilds because of stuck float inlet valves & gas free flowing into the engine & on down into the crankcase.
Gas in a small engine crankcase oil, that engine wont last very long, specially when the owners think all they have to do is turn the key on & start cutting grass.
Neil