โMay-04-2013 01:27 PM
โMay-05-2013 05:52 PM
โMay-05-2013 04:43 PM
โMay-05-2013 03:59 PM
โMay-05-2013 03:32 PM
jhilley wrote:
There are any number of good reasons to use PWM controllers with higher voltage panels - smaller cable, longer cable runs, lower cost, bigger panels for limited roof space, lower cost per watt panels
โMay-05-2013 02:45 PM
pianotuna wrote:
Hi,
Just because the controller won't burn out doesn't mean that it is a good idea to use high voltage with pwm controllers.jhilley wrote:
You can use PWM controllers with higher voltage panels. The TriStar works with panels up to 125 volts solar output.
โMay-05-2013 01:28 PM
jhilley wrote:
You can use PWM controllers with higher voltage panels. The TriStar works with panels up to 125 volts solar output.
โMay-05-2013 01:22 PM
RJsfishin wrote:I agree here. Larger panels work well in a fixed position, except in heavy wind and snow load locations.
Those big house panels are cheaper $ per watt, but for portable use, they are big and heavy.
I elected to go w/ 2 smaller lighter, easier to store panels And a $10 15 amp controller works fine w/ them too..
โMay-05-2013 08:20 AM
KD4UPL wrote:
A cheap (poor) charge controller can cause lots of problems. It's not the place to skimp. You want one that has programmable charging set points so you can charge your batteries to the manufacturer's specifications. A poor controller can overcharge or undercharge your batteries. Also, an MPPT controller will allow your panels full output to be better utilized than with a PWM controller. If you're going with a larger (less expensive watt/dollar) panel it will likely have a high enough Vmp that you will need a MPPT controller anyway.
RV usage, I guess because of price, is one of the last places PWM controllers are installed anymore. The home, cabin, grid tied solar industry has almost completely moved to MPPT controllers for all of their advantages.
I would highly recommend Blue Sky charge controllers.
โMay-05-2013 08:02 AM
โMay-05-2013 07:50 AM
Shadow Catcher wrote:
The claims for 20 to 43% increase efficiency are bogus which makes all the other claims suspect.
We have a high voltage panel that typically puts out 43V at the controller in full sun with no tilt. It is run through a Morningstar Sun Saver MPPT controller and I monitor using a Victron battery monitor. The high voltage means you get some usable current even in shaded areas. Just for fun I measured voltage from a full moon and got 12.7V.
The review in the Wind & Sun forum http://www.wind-sun.com/ForumVB/showthread.php?17511-Eco-Worthy-20a-MPPT-charge-controller-review
The RV net forum discussion http://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/26464298/srt/pa/pging/1/page/2.cfm
โMay-05-2013 07:33 AM
โMay-05-2013 06:41 AM
โMay-05-2013 04:49 AM
โMay-05-2013 04:43 AM
KD4UPL wrote:
A cheap (poor) charge controller can cause lots of problems. It's not the place to skimp. You want one that has programmable charging set points so you can charge your batteries to the manufacturer's specifications. A poor controller can overcharge or undercharge your batteries. Also, an MPPT controller will allow your panels full output to be better utilized than with a PWM controller. If you're going with a larger (less expensive watt/dollar) panel it will likely have a high enough Vmp that you will need a MPPT controller anyway.
RV usage, I guess because of price, is one of the last places PWM controllers are installed anymore. The home, cabin, grid tied solar industry has almost completely moved to MPPT controllers for all of their advantages.
I would highly recommend Blue Sky charge controllers.