cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Replacing 100w Solar Panel

BMCM
Explorer
Explorer
Single panel on my camper, hooked to a Solar Boost 2000 controller.
The panel (unk make) died.
Northern Arizona Wind and Sun has a 140w Kyocera that is about the same footprint as the existing panel, at what seems to be a reasonable price. Shipping is $22.
I've heard good things about Kyocera..
Thoughts..?

Robert
F-350, Scorpion, QC, Dually/Alpenleak


All Gave Some,
Some Gave All.
17 REPLIES 17

Almot
Explorer III
Explorer III
Snowman9000 wrote:
I would be surprised if there are not some corners cut in making the cheapest panels.

There are.
#1: labor $2/hr with no benefits.
#2: thinner aluminum and/or simpler frame profile. They copy existing designs but when profile is too complicated=expensive, they cut the corners.

Snowman9000
Explorer
Explorer
I would be surprised if there are not some corners cut in making the cheapest panels.

I have several cheap ones from ML Solar. Probably equivalent to Renogy. They work. That's the extent of my evaluation so far. ๐Ÿ™‚
Currently RV-less but not done yet.

CA_Traveler
Explorer III
Explorer III
Santa Clarita is an easy drive to SolarBlvd.
2009 Holiday Rambler 42' Scepter with ISL 400 Cummins
750 Watts Solar Morningstar MPPT 60 Controller
2014 Grand Cherokee Overland

Bob

scrubjaysnest
Explorer
Explorer
Almot wrote:
It's hard to notice 6-7% without proper logging and software like on high-end controllers.

Projected degradation in manufacturers specs range from 0.3 to 0.9%. Kyocera reports 0.4-0.5% a year, so it could be only 3% in 7 years. You won't notice this. Dust on the panel will affect the output more.

The Kyocera 120 watt I had, a 2001, until it failed, met new specs when I received it last spring. Keeping it clean was the big problem.
Axis 24.1 class A 500watts solar TS-45CC Trimetric
Very noisy generator :M
2016 Wrangler JK dinghy
โ€œThey who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.โ€ Benjamin Franklin

Almot
Explorer III
Explorer III
It's hard to notice 6-7% without proper logging and software like on high-end controllers.

Projected degradation in manufacturers specs range from 0.3 to 0.9%. Kyocera reports 0.4-0.5% a year, so it could be only 3% in 7 years. You won't notice this. Dust on the panel will affect the output more.

CJW8
Explorer
Explorer
I had 3 of the panels you are considering. Yes, they were expensive. I had them 6-7 years and they did not lose 6-7% output as was suggested. Excellent panels!
2003 Forest River Sierra M-37SP Toy Hauler- Traded in
2015 Keystone Raptor 332TS 5th wheel toy Hauler (sold)
2004 Winnebago Vectra. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee toad

scrubjaysnest
Explorer
Explorer
A pair of 100 watt panels will run around $225 with free shipping. The poly, China brand we've have used for the last five years no problem. The used 120 watt Kyocera I picked up shorts the first 18 cells above 40 der F. This is a known failure mode for the year 2000 thru 2002 Kyocera panels.

Presently redoing the solar. The two we've currently have will go on the roof and we will purchase two 100 watt from Missouri Wind and Solar because of the foot print.

Stopped by Northern AZ Wind and Sun last summer and picked up several items. Nice folks to deal with.
Axis 24.1 class A 500watts solar TS-45CC Trimetric
Very noisy generator :M
2016 Wrangler JK dinghy
โ€œThey who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.โ€ Benjamin Franklin

Almot
Explorer III
Explorer III
Poly is more efficient. There "used to be" that mono were much more efficient, but today in specs there may be mere 1-2% difference between the two. In real world poly would fare better as they drop less under cloudy skies.

If you are concerned about efficiency and can't add more panel wattage, you might want to replace the controller with MPPT as well.

Cdash
Explorer
Explorer
Boon Docker wrote:
Almot wrote:


Stay away from Monocrystalline panels.


What would the reason be to stay away from Mono ?


If be curious to know that took. When I was reading the differences between poly and mono, it seemed like mono was better for RV type use. Don't exactly remember why though....

Boon_Docker
Explorer III
Explorer III
Almot wrote:


Stay away from Monocrystalline panels.


What would the reason be to stay away from Mono ?

Almot
Explorer III
Explorer III
Post removed - because I called Chinese knock-offs knock-offs? PC cr-ap seems to have gone a bit far, in this instance.

Let's try again:
Kyocera is a good and well known brand. As I wrote in the earlier (removed) post, cheaper Chinese knock-offs are plentiful and it "looks" like they've now learned how to make them acceptable quality. So - doesn't matter much.

Any panel output will deteriorate by ~1% a year, and scratches on the glass will add to this. It will still "crank out the amps" but less and less, as years go by.

Bigger panels - over 150W - are typically cheaper per watt. $2/W is reasonable for small panels, but again, you can find small panels for $1.00-1.50 per Watt if you shop around. Check Solarblvd.com.

Amazon might have some with free S/H, though $22 from Az WindSun is very reasonable.

Stay away from Monocrystalline panels.

Blackdiamond
Explorer
Explorer
Amazon has some good prices.
03' Fleetwood Southwind 32VS
Enclosed Trailer hauling the toys
05 525 EXC KTM
15' FE350s Husqvarna/KTM
07 Rhino, long travel, 4 seater

Dirtpig
Explorer
Explorer
The Kyocera panels are excellent. I originally chose them because of reputation and the footprint size for my old truck camper roof. Just purchased another last year and installed 2 of them on my Nash trailer. You can view my install in my signature
2015 Nash 25C bumper pull /w 300watts solar my install
My Truck & RV youtube channel
2005 F-350 Diesel 4x4 CC SB SRW
2001 Honda XR400: many mods
12ft Lund WC boat & 9.9 Yamaha 4 stroke on custom loader.

Colo_Native
Explorer
Explorer
Try Renogy.com they have some good prices seem to be a lot cheaper price than a lot of places.
2015 Winnebago Forza 34T
pushed by a 2011 Fusion Hybrid or 2020 Escape Hybrid
Retired DFD