โAug-10-2014 12:50 PM
โAug-12-2014 08:16 AM
โAug-12-2014 06:15 AM
Tystevens wrote:
I'm with APT -- I wouldn't be a big fan of the AWD. Twice as many moving parts, so more maintenance, more to go wrong, and more fuel used. We have a few friends w/ full size AWD GM suv's (Denalis and Escalades) w/ the 6.0, and they seem to use quite a bit more fuel than our 5.3 Subs have. I don't know if it is the engine or the AWD, but something is amiss. The 6.2 seems like a great engine, though.
โAug-11-2014 02:30 PM
โAug-11-2014 07:49 AM
โAug-11-2014 04:03 AM
MARK VANDERBENT wrote:
I am noticing a few nice 07-08 Yukon xls for sale out there with 6.2 6 speed for good price. Seems like that truck would pull good !? Prices seem decent at 16,000 - 21,000
โAug-10-2014 09:17 PM
intheburbs wrote:blt2ski wrote:
THat is the half ton is it not? It will probably pull good enough, the issue if My suspicion is correct, payload will be your issue with a family and hitch wt added in.
Marty
Agree. Get a 3/4 ton in that same model year range and you get the 6.0 and the 6 speed, no AFM, and a better payload. Payload of my 2500 is 2,088 lbs. But even with that payload, I'm maxed out with my family of 5 (3 teenagers) that weighs ~830 lbs, and a trailer that weighs ~6,300 lbs.
โAug-10-2014 09:09 PM
blt2ski wrote:
THat is the half ton is it not? It will probably pull good enough, the issue if My suspicion is correct, payload will be your issue with a family and hitch wt added in.
Marty
โAug-10-2014 01:48 PM
Bob & Betsy - USN Aviation Ret'd '78 & LEO Ret'd '03 & "Oath Keeper Forever"
โAug-10-2014 01:24 PM