โJun-09-2014 01:59 PM
โJun-11-2014 07:32 AM
FishOnOne wrote:Bedlam wrote:
Like others have posted, the focus should have been on temperatures generated instead of speed. I'm perfectly happy coming in behind the pack knowing I can continue on without heat or mechanical issues in my older 6.0 PSD that everyone loves to hate. I have been lucky that reliability has been a strong point of my truck (even if some think it is an enigma) while still giving me sufficient power to climb hills under load comfortably all while being 100% stock.
The emissions complexity and initial cost of current diesels is swaying me toward a gasoline engine in my next truck even though I love diesels. The push has been for ever increasing performance without efficiency gains which also drives up operating costs. I think it's pretty sad when a diesel diehard is looking to abandon the technology due to the direction the manufacturers and marketing are pointed.
I had a 6.0 PSD and traded it for a 6.7 PSD and I can honestly say my 6.7 PSD outperforms (big time) and makes better fuel economy than my 6.0 PSD so I'm not the least disappointed with my current emissions equipped diesel so far.
In addition I think this kind of test with a gas powered truck would really differentiate the performance difference between a diesel and gas powered truck. Let's just say it would "separate the men from the boys"! :B
โJun-11-2014 06:07 AM
โJun-11-2014 02:22 AM
RamTC wrote:No it's not tow ratings, but it can form the basis for them...Huntindog wrote:RamTC wrote:Here ya go.travelnutz wrote:
Huntindog,
Qoute:
"It's been a couple of years but, it was brought up about how Ford and Dodge came up with their power numbers vs. GM.
GM was the ONLY one to rate the power by the stringent SAE method.
I forget the particulars, but basically think peak vs. continuous power. That explains how a lower rated truck such as the GM can win these contests."
BINGO!!!! You win 1st place!
And if the engine is stripped on a test stand or the output measured at the drive wheel!
Where's this info coming from? Motor Trend reports that all three HD's still use their own in house numbers for 2015, not the J8207 rating your implying on this HD thread.
SAE certified dyno tests
Thanks, I mistakenly thought the reference was about Tow ratings.
โJun-10-2014 09:07 PM
โJun-10-2014 07:28 PM
Bedlam wrote:
Like others have posted, the focus should have been on temperatures generated instead of speed. I'm perfectly happy coming in behind the pack knowing I can continue on without heat or mechanical issues in my older 6.0 PSD that everyone loves to hate. I have been lucky that reliability has been a strong point of my truck (even if some think it is an enigma) while still giving me sufficient power to climb hills under load comfortably all while being 100% stock.
The emissions complexity and initial cost of current diesels is swaying me toward a gasoline engine in my next truck even though I love diesels. The push has been for ever increasing performance without efficiency gains which also drives up operating costs. I think it's pretty sad when a diesel diehard is looking to abandon the technology due to the direction the manufacturers and marketing are pointed.
โJun-10-2014 04:18 PM
Huntindog wrote:RamTC wrote:Here ya go.travelnutz wrote:
Huntindog,
Qoute:
"It's been a couple of years but, it was brought up about how Ford and Dodge came up with their power numbers vs. GM.
GM was the ONLY one to rate the power by the stringent SAE method.
I forget the particulars, but basically think peak vs. continuous power. That explains how a lower rated truck such as the GM can win these contests."
BINGO!!!! You win 1st place!
And if the engine is stripped on a test stand or the output measured at the drive wheel!
Where's this info coming from? Motor Trend reports that all three HD's still use their own in house numbers for 2015, not the J8207 rating your implying on this HD thread.
SAE certified dyno tests
โJun-10-2014 04:13 PM
RamTC wrote:Here ya go.travelnutz wrote:
Huntindog,
Qoute:
"It's been a couple of years but, it was brought up about how Ford and Dodge came up with their power numbers vs. GM.
GM was the ONLY one to rate the power by the stringent SAE method.
I forget the particulars, but basically think peak vs. continuous power. That explains how a lower rated truck such as the GM can win these contests."
BINGO!!!! You win 1st place!
And if the engine is stripped on a test stand or the output measured at the drive wheel!
Where's this info coming from? Motor Trend reports that all three HD's still use their own in house numbers for 2015, not the J8207 rating your implying on this HD thread.
โJun-10-2014 04:00 PM
travelnutz wrote:
Huntindog,
Qoute:
"It's been a couple of years but, it was brought up about how Ford and Dodge came up with their power numbers vs. GM.
GM was the ONLY one to rate the power by the stringent SAE method.
I forget the particulars, but basically think peak vs. continuous power. That explains how a lower rated truck such as the GM can win these contests."
BINGO!!!! You win 1st place!
And if the engine is stripped on a test stand or the output measured at the drive wheel!
โJun-10-2014 02:24 PM
โJun-10-2014 01:33 PM
ib516 wrote:
The only thing I absolutely can't wrap my head around when it comes to the GM Duramax is that dang DEF tank hanging down just waiting to be knocked off by a chunk of ice, rock, etc. They really need to rethink that placement.
โJun-10-2014 10:42 AM
Turtle n Peeps wrote:ib516 wrote:ksss wrote:
I would like to also know the ambient air temp as well as coolant and tranny temp of the these trucks when they reach the top. That to me tells me more about the capacity of the pickup than does speed/time up the hill alone.
Exactly. The video lacked those kinds of details which I was wanting to know.
There is a reason they did this where they did this and when they did this. I would bet money it was no accident there was snow around when they did this test.
There was a reason they did not do this test on a 105 degree day on the Cajon pass.
There is a reason boats with the same engine as trucks are rated at a way higher HP and way higher duty cycle.
It's easy to make any HP you want. It's extremely difficult to handle the thermal load for that high HP. Ever see the fan or radiator size on a 6.7 Ford, 6.7 Dodge or 6.6 Chevy? :E
โJun-10-2014 10:17 AM
ib516 wrote:ksss wrote:
I would like to also know the ambient air temp as well as coolant and tranny temp of the these trucks when they reach the top. That to me tells me more about the capacity of the pickup than does speed/time up the hill alone.
Exactly. The video lacked those kinds of details which I was wanting to know.
โJun-10-2014 09:29 AM
โJun-10-2014 07:34 AM