Sep-22-2016 04:31 PM
Oct-10-2016 07:44 AM
twodownzero wrote:
Automatics are fine if you prefer to give up the durability for convenience.
Oct-05-2016 02:00 PM
Oct-05-2016 01:45 PM
Oct-05-2016 01:22 PM
Oct-05-2016 12:54 PM
Oct-05-2016 09:51 AM
Reddog1 wrote:
Does anyone on the forum really know why the Ford, GM, or Dodge does anything?
Oct-05-2016 09:18 AM
2004.5 Ram SLT LB 3500 DRW Quad Cab 4x4
1988 Bigfoot (C11.5) TC (1900# w/standard equip. per decal), 130 watts solar, 100 AH AGM, Polar Cub A/C, EU2000i Honda
Toad: 91 Zuke
Oct-04-2016 10:03 PM
Oct-04-2016 10:02 PM
2004.5 Ram SLT LB 3500 DRW Quad Cab 4x4
1988 Bigfoot (C11.5) TC (1900# w/standard equip. per decal), 130 watts solar, 100 AH AGM, Polar Cub A/C, EU2000i Honda
Toad: 91 Zuke
Oct-04-2016 08:42 PM
Oct-04-2016 08:37 PM
taycotrains wrote:
After owning a 6.0 diesel in a new Ford SD...Ill never own another diesel...My 6.2 gasser suits me fine.
Oct-04-2016 08:34 PM
twodownzero wrote:While I can't speak for GM, Ford dropped their manual transmissions due to less then 1 percent of truck buyers wanting them. This was from a Ford press release.
The reason manuals are not common and not offered by Ford and GM is emissions, not durability. The newest automatics are great, but nothing will ever beat the durability of a manual transmission.
Oct-04-2016 06:19 PM
Oct-04-2016 01:19 PM