โMar-19-2018 02:10 PM
โMar-19-2018 06:36 PM
โMar-19-2018 05:29 PM
โMar-19-2018 05:25 PM
โMar-19-2018 04:23 PM
โMar-19-2018 04:21 PM
the bear II wrote:
I know photos can be deceiving but to me it looks like the front of the trailer is higher than the rear. I would like to see some more squat at the rear of the suburban. The weight of the rear slideout may be the culprit.
โMar-19-2018 04:10 PM
โMar-19-2018 04:10 PM
โMar-19-2018 03:55 PM
DownTheAvenue wrote:Hornnumb2 wrote:
Just my 2 cents but that looks like a whole lot of trailer for 1/2 suburban.
X2
โMar-19-2018 03:43 PM
Hornnumb2 wrote:
Just my 2 cents but that looks like a whole lot of trailer for 1/2 suburban.
โMar-19-2018 03:22 PM
ScottG wrote:the bear II wrote:
I know photos can be deceiving but to me it looks like the front of the trailer is higher than the rear. I would like to see some more squat at the rear of the suburban. The weight of the rear slideout may be the culprit.
I was thinking the same thing about the TT being a little high in front (couldn't see pic originally).
Even being a little high makes a big difference.
I would measure the frame to ground at both front and back.
If it's higher in front, I would lower the front one hole and try it out. That will make the spring bars tighter as well. You may even be able to back off on them after that.
BTW, you may already know this but 2 washers = 1 chain link.
โMar-19-2018 02:54 PM
the bear II wrote:
I know photos can be deceiving but to me it looks like the front of the trailer is higher than the rear. I would like to see some more squat at the rear of the suburban. The weight of the rear slideout may be the culprit.
โMar-19-2018 02:52 PM
โMar-19-2018 02:50 PM
โMar-19-2018 02:47 PM
โMar-19-2018 02:40 PM