Dec-17-2018 06:28 AM
Dec-18-2018 08:30 AM
Dec-18-2018 08:22 AM
ppine wrote:
Most of the people that don't like diesels have never owned one.
I feel the joy every time I start the 7.3.
The more miles you drive, the more you pull, the more you need a truck the more you need a diesel.
My 2002 Ford is easily worth twice what a similar gas truck is worth, and going up in value.
Dec-18-2018 07:30 AM
Dec-18-2018 07:15 AM
rhagfo wrote:ib516 wrote:
Other than at 11000 ft (one road in the whole of the North American Continent), I have never seen, or heard of the 6.4L Hemi acting the way it does on the Ike Gauntlet test at high altitude.
I have towed 12k (GCW was scaled at 21k) with mine all over the Canadian Rockies on all the grades there (6 to 7%, some near Radium at 11%) and never been down to 20 or 30 mph. There was only one time that I experienced personally that I couldn't accelerate when I wanted to. Times have changed. The newest crop of modern gassers have plenty of power.
In fact, my 2014 Ram 2500 gasser had:
- More payload
- Higher GAWRs *front and rear
- Higher max tow rating (by over 2000#)
- Higher GCWR by 2000#
Than my 2007 3500 SRW Cummins had. The only thing that was lower was my GVWR. The 3500 SRW was 10,100#, the 2500 was 10,000# even. The 2007 Cummins downshifted less, but I dare say a stop watch would see them nearly the same towing the same 12k 5er that I did with both. Real world facts.
The gasser got 7-9 mpg, usually 8ish, the 5.9L Cummins got about 9-11 mpg, usually 10ish hauling the same 37' 5er. Real world.
You do realize that in 2013 Ram finally woke up and put some real numbers to their trucks? Heck my DD is the proud owner of a very nice 2004 Ram CTD 3500 DRW GVWR 12,200#. If I were to buy a 2013+ Ram 3500 CTD SRW with a GVWR of 12,300#I am actually looking at a lightly used 2013+ Ram CTD DRW with a GVWR of 14,000#
Then there is my 2001 Ram 2500 CTD with 3.55's and a 5 speed manual, it has a small timing chip and RV275 injectors, can pull 55 mph up a 6% to 7% grade coming out of a 45 mph corner, in 4th gear (direct drive)pulling our 12,500# 5er, 20,500# GCVW.
I hate to get rid of this truck, except I am currently well over the 8,800# GVWR.
Dec-17-2018 10:44 PM
ktmrfs wrote:
when we bought our 2004.5 duramax, there was IMHO a very noticeable difference between gas and diesel towing performance.
Fast forward to when we got the 2015.5 duramax. Gas engines have advanced to the point where towing capability is pretty much equal.
Yes, we still went with diesel, but in reality differences in tow ratings on the gas vs. diesel is pretty minimal, gasser will give higher payload, worse mileage, and need to run much higher RPM on grades. Diesel will cost more, get better mileage, and run lower RPM on grades.
Both will do good job towing in todays trucks. IMHO Pick what you like.
Dec-17-2018 10:28 PM
ib516 wrote:
Other than at 11000 ft (one road in the whole of the North American Continent), I have never seen, or heard of the 6.4L Hemi acting the way it does on the Ike Gauntlet test at high altitude.
I have towed 12k (GCW was scaled at 21k) with mine all over the Canadian Rockies on all the grades there (6 to 7%, some near Radium at 11%) and never been down to 20 or 30 mph. There was only one time that I experienced personally that I couldn't accelerate when I wanted to. Times have changed. The newest crop of modern gassers have plenty of power.
In fact, my 2014 Ram 2500 gasser had:
- More payload
- Higher GAWRs *front and rear
- Higher max tow rating (by over 2000#)
- Higher GCWR by 2000#
Than my 2007 3500 SRW Cummins had. The only thing that was lower was my GVWR. The 3500 SRW was 10,100#, the 2500 was 10,000# even. The 2007 Cummins downshifted less, but I dare say a stop watch would see them nearly the same towing the same 12k 5er that I did with both. Real world facts.
The gasser got 7-9 mpg, usually 8ish, the 5.9L Cummins got about 9-11 mpg, usually 10ish hauling the same 37' 5er. Real world.
Dec-17-2018 09:39 PM
Dec-17-2018 06:44 PM
Dec-17-2018 06:24 PM
Dec-17-2018 06:04 PM
Dec-17-2018 05:18 PM
Dec-17-2018 02:02 PM
time2roll wrote:ScottG wrote:
Did everyone get the point the OP made about this being a weight thing and not a monetary issue?
This part?BeerBrewer wrote:
So the fact that a diesel contains more oil or needs some extra things done doesn't concern me at all. Unfortunately upfront costs due matter to us, but its "Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it"......
Not sure what the budget breaking point is. I have a tendency to go a little small if things are tight. Otherwise probably a used truck is best option.
BeerBrewer wrote:
What I meant by a break point, is there a point where a gas 3/4 or 1 ton truck struggles to handle a load. I'd hate to buy a new truck and find myself going up a steep grade only able to do 20 or 30 MPH. We absolutely plan upon touring out west, through higher elevations, even hitting Alaska.
You see I'm trying to avoid repeating some issues that I've had towing a trailer in the past. About 15 years ago, due to my job, we moved from Arizona to Long Island, NY. We thought it would be fun and it was a blast, to drive across the country rather than fly. We had most of our stuff moved by a mover, but we moved our vehicles (Mini-Van and Durango) and some of our "precious" stuff ourselves. So we rented the largest U-Haul trailer we could find and pulled it with our Durango, (318 V8) which was equipped to tow. After we loaded it we had the trailer weighed and we were well within the specs, but we did need to shift the load around a tad. My wife drove the Mini-Van and drove the Durango. For the most part the Durango did fine, except for the climb up to Flagstaff and on the "switch-back" on Rte 40 headed east out of Tennessee. When doing the climb up to Flagstaff I had trouble maintaining speed, I think I was only doing like 20 or 30 mph. The engine temp was climbing real high, so high that I had the heat blasting and it was summer. I had the opposite problem When we hit the "switch-back" coming out of Tennessee, I had trouble keeping my speed down and I white knuckled it all the way down. I'd rather not relive either experience if possible. Even though we had a few "issues" we had a blast. Frankly, it was this trip that spawned the idea of us getting an TT and touring the country "some day". Not only did we see some amazing sites, we also met some equally amazing people. Well "some day" has arrived!
I currently do most of the maintenance on my vehicles now and plan on doing so in the future. So the fact that a diesel contains more oil or needs some extra things done doesn't concern me at all. Unfortunately upfront costs due matter to us, but its "Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it"......
Dec-17-2018 01:32 PM
Dec-17-2018 01:28 PM