โJul-29-2014 04:26 PM
โJul-30-2014 01:10 PM
JamesBr wrote:So true. That "Oh Well" probably stems from the fact the issue the guy had was a core business decision the park made. They aren't going to change it and more than if you went into McDonalds as a dedicated Vegan and told them you were never going to return if they didn't stop selling burgers made with meat. I am sure that park isn't going to change their entire pricing structure just because some guy doesn't want to pay the going rate for his guests. Not all customers are created the same. There are many businesses that believe the best approach to customer service is to bend over backwards for the top 25% of your customers, try and earn the business of the next 50% so that they become one of your top 25% and cull out the bottom 25% because that is where all your expense and trouble comes from.
The "oh well" comes from the fact that there are next to no other options if you want a campground that is not 40+ minutes away from the Western suburbs of Baltimore. There are not many options for campgrounds until you get well outside the Baltimore-Washington Corridor.
The per visitor charges I notice usually becomes a policy to discourage those that use to get a site, claim 2 people at the site and have 10 guests show up and stay the entire visit. It stinks, but these are places of business and need to cover the cost of doing business or they will no longer exist.
The issue and you can read them all here is "why do I have to pay for this?" You have the lone traveler, the couple with no kids or pets, and then you have the other side of the spectrum of multiple dogs, or a large family and possibly a pet.
So where do you set the price for your campground? Do you shoot for the middle and hope you get more smaller groups then larger so you can stay out of the red? Do you charge the full cost of a maxed out campsite to everyone? Do you offer the lowest rate possible for the 2 person or less site, and have add ons for everything else? No matter what they choose, someone will not like it and think there should be a discount.
โJul-30-2014 11:46 AM
โJul-30-2014 11:36 AM
Medico wrote:
When I said I was going to post my negative comments to the various forums I am a member of their response was again "Oh well!"
Doug, Linda, Audrey (USN) & Andrew
โJul-30-2014 10:48 AM
โJul-30-2014 09:48 AM
โJul-30-2014 09:12 AM
โJul-30-2014 08:52 AM
โJul-30-2014 08:49 AM
โJul-30-2014 08:26 AM
2005 Chevy Silverado 3500 dually CC/LB Duramax/Allison
2008 Jayco Designer 35RLTS fifth wheel
Onan 5500W Marquis Gold gas generator (HGJAB - 1038D)
โJul-30-2014 07:55 AM
โJul-30-2014 07:45 AM
Medico wrote:
I think what upset me the most was the poor reaction to my complaint. "Oh Well!" That's the same as take it or leave it. In the service and entertainment industry, companies make their livings off return guests, not new guests. If these industries had to rely on new guests, just imagine their advertising costs. The service we received when we lodged a complaint does not make me wish to return. Also these type industries rely on word of mouth advertising. Just look at the word of mouth advertising they are receiving now!
โJul-30-2014 06:47 AM
โJul-30-2014 06:18 AM
โJul-30-2014 06:16 AM
Veebyes wrote:
The extra charge for a few visitors resulted in a 6 year boycott of KOA from us.And yet they are still in business and still use the add on fee structure in their pricing. Don Quixote would be proud.
โJul-30-2014 05:44 AM