โJul-29-2016 05:29 AM
โJul-30-2016 07:23 PM
gmcsmoke wrote:I beg to differ. They are at least 4" higher at the bed rail as well as the step into the cab to name just two areas. 15 to 20 years ago 4x4 owners went thru the same stuff. Dealers were removing axle blocks and other stuff to make them work with the 5th wheels of the day. The current 4x4's of my brand sit close to 5" higher or more than mine. And yes I have walked up to them. JMHO.john&bet wrote:
For me just one of many reasons I will not own a 4X4 of any brand. Do not now and no plans to do so in the future.
4WD doesn't have anything to do with it.
โJul-30-2016 03:36 PM
john&bet wrote:
For me just one of many reasons I will not own a 4X4 of any brand. Do not now and no plans to do so in the future.
โJul-30-2016 11:58 AM
โJul-30-2016 11:08 AM
Lilliemae30 wrote:Just a friendly reminder that what ever you do, don't raise your RV above 13' 6" at it highest point.
I am the original poster. Thank you to all those who responded in a helpful manner and so quickly. My hubby asked me to try to find information on this forum while he was on the phone with multiple places to get the best information he could.
We were stressed and nearly ready to return the truck. A lot has changed in the 13 years since we last purchased our old one and of course none of this was an issue then.
We have decided to follow the consensus to hitch up to the camper and go from there as outlined by helpful posters.
We cannot do it until Tuesday when the derails for the existing Reese is installed. I will updAte you all when we find our best resolution.
By the way, I have used this forum for many years and do know about and use the SEARCH button. You have to be pretty specific to find what you are looking for, as I am no mechanic, I did the best I could. Again thAnk you for your responses. They helped relive the pressure on us.
โJul-30-2016 05:14 AM
Lilliemae30 wrote:
I am the original poster. Thank you to all those who responded in a helpful manner and so quickly. My hubby asked me to try to find information on this forum while he was on the phone with multiple places to get the best information he could.
We were stressed and nearly ready to return the truck. A lot has changed in the 13 years since we last purchased our old one and of course none of this was an issue then.
We have decided to follow the consensus to hitch up to the camper and go from there as outlined by helpful posters.
We cannot do it until Tuesday when the derails for the existing Reese is installed. I will updAte you all when we find our best resolution.
By the way, I have used this forum for many years and do know about and use the SEARCH button. You have to be pretty specific to find what you are looking for, as I am no mechanic, I did the best I could. Again thAnk you for your responses. They helped relive the pressure on us.
โJul-29-2016 09:15 PM
SoCalDesertRider wrote:
It's not the radius, it's the whole axle diameter, plus the thickness of the spring pack, plus the height of the original bottom spring pad, plus the height of the new top spring pad.
You're moving the bottom of the spring pack from where it is, about 3" below the bottom of the axle tube, to where it will now be, about 1" above the top of the axle tube. This example is assuming both spring pads are about 1" high and the spring pack is about 2" thick and the axle tube is about 3" diameter.
Going from bottom to top, it's the spring pack thickness (2"), plus the bottom spring pad height (1"), plus the axle tube diameter (3"), plus the top spring pad height (1"). This totals 7", in this example. Axles can be all different diameters. Spring packs can be all different thicknesses. Spring pads can be all different heights. So it is entirely possible to end up with a measurement less than or greater than this example.
Another example could be a 2-1/2" axle, 1/2" spring pads and a 1-1/2" spring pack, which would make 5" instead of 7".
โJul-29-2016 08:56 PM
โJul-29-2016 08:45 PM
โJul-29-2016 07:59 PM
โJul-29-2016 07:32 PM
garyp4951 wrote:SoCalDesertRider wrote:garyp4951 wrote:Plus 2 times the height of the spring pads...
...since it would be the diameter of the axle plus the thickness of the spring pack.
If you have a 3" diameter axle tube, 2" thick spring packs, and 1" high spring mounting pads, the lift ends up being 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 7
Thanks, I forgot about the spring perches.
โJul-29-2016 07:10 PM
garyp4951 wrote:SoCalDesertRider wrote:garyp4951 wrote:Plus 2 times the height of the spring pads...
...since it would be the diameter of the axle plus the thickness of the spring pack.
If you have a 3" diameter axle tube, 2" thick spring packs, and 1" high spring mounting pads, the lift ends up being 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 7
Thanks, I forgot about the spring perches.
โJul-29-2016 06:17 PM
โJul-29-2016 06:09 PM
SoCalDesertRider wrote:garyp4951 wrote:Plus 2 times the height of the spring pads...
...since it would be the diameter of the axle plus the thickness of the spring pack.
If you have a 3" diameter axle tube, 2" thick spring packs, and 1" high spring mounting pads, the lift ends up being 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 7
โJul-29-2016 03:19 PM
โJul-29-2016 02:36 PM