โSep-18-2016 07:39 PM
โSep-24-2016 05:49 PM
โSep-21-2016 04:30 AM
APT wrote:coolmom42 wrote:
Your WDH does not reduce the tongue weight. The total tongue weight is still ALL on the tow vehicle. So you have to take all of it into consideration in the cargo capacity of the tow vehicle.
What a WDH does is move part of the tongue weight to the front axle, vs having it all on the rear axle. So it may help reduce overloading the rear axle.
A slight clarification: a WDH can reduce TW carried by the TV axles, but it does not reduce the TW for the receiver. It is possible to put 20 percent of TW on the trailer axles for many vehicles when fully restoring front axle weight to unhitched amount.
โSep-21-2016 04:15 AM
โSep-21-2016 04:07 AM
โSep-20-2016 08:07 PM
โSep-20-2016 08:07 PM
Rickincali wrote:
Thanks for the answer and clarification. That is how I understood it as well.
It is amazing the bad info given out by the sales persons.
โSep-20-2016 07:22 PM
โSep-20-2016 07:09 PM
coolmom42 wrote:
Your WDH does not reduce the tongue weight. The total tongue weight is still ALL on the tow vehicle. So you have to take all of it into consideration in the cargo capacity of the tow vehicle.
What a WDH does is move part of the tongue weight to the front axle, vs having it all on the rear axle. So it may help reduce overloading the rear axle.
โSep-20-2016 04:47 AM
โSep-19-2016 09:59 PM
camp-n-family wrote:
If you're really concerned about staying under payload consider that a portion (~20percent)of that tongue weight will get transferred back onto the tt axles through the use of a wdh.
โSep-19-2016 12:39 PM
โSep-19-2016 10:01 AM
โSep-19-2016 07:27 AM
Rickincali wrote:
Thanks for the replies. I will get my TV weighed and see where I am at then. This is quite a learning experience to say the least.
โSep-19-2016 07:10 AM