Jan-27-2013 03:34 PM
May-03-2013 11:32 AM
May-03-2013 11:26 AM
May-03-2013 11:23 AM
May-03-2013 05:46 AM
brulaz wrote:
.
The full queen in FunFinder just came out this year I think. Was looking at a 214WSD. They also have a vaulted ceiling for us taller folk, with what looks like a block foam insulation roof. Amazing how spacious such a short trailer can be. All walls are laminated, except the front cap. Solid cabinetry and lots of drawers/cupboards. According to the sticker, each axle had a GAWR of 3945#, very good for a 6175# GVWR trailer.
But then I saw the sewer drains and valves sticking down underneath. Looked like they were only 6" from the ground. I'm sure they would get ripped off the first time we went out. Very poor design, and the whole under-belly looked like an after thought. Also, only 3 small cabinet vents for the 20K furnace, and only 30+6 gal fresh water tank.
May-03-2013 05:28 AM
May-03-2013 05:03 AM
Mik68 wrote:
Fun finder has full queen as does Lance if it matters? Does for me as i'm over 6ft. KZ & Nash only appear to have 'mini queens'. Nothing worse than not been able to stretch out in your own bed i say.
May-02-2013 10:50 PM
May-02-2013 10:41 PM
May-02-2013 10:35 PM
marykays1 wrote:
Mike E,
Thanks. Thanks a lot! LOL, I only saw a couple KZ's and ruled them out due to the small kitchen/counters etc. Now I've done a search for used ones and have come up with a ton of them. No, the kitchen is not ideal, however we could possibly find a used bunkhouse model for WAY cheaper than a new one....I just don't know the quality of a KZ and it doesn't appear that they're automatically a four-season camper, which is very important to us.
Anyone have any thoughts on the KZ's?
Man, they sure do have a ton of floorplans.....I don't even know where they're made.
Thanks again Mike E!
Mary Kay
May-02-2013 09:33 AM
RVcrazy wrote:
No comparison for us. Nash trailers have been around since 1994(?) and are built sturdy. They make their own heavy duty frames. (No Lippert concerns.) More ground clearance just means that you don't need to sweat speed bumps, gas station driveways, or off-road use. Lance is a good company, but hasn't been building trailers nearly as long as Northwood.
May-02-2013 06:06 AM
May-02-2013 04:48 AM
2012Coleman wrote:
I don't think Lance would make my short list until they start putting in ducted A/C. Sorry Woodglue...
May-02-2013 04:07 AM
May-01-2013 09:53 PM
rhinowino wrote:
We have been trying to decide between the Nash 25C and the Lance 2185 (we like the bunks for the kids) and need a true 4 seasons TT. Since I am in So Cal only 2 hrs from Lance factory that has some appeal. I also like the Lance product since they have seem to have thought about all the little things. The Nash on the other hand appears to be built on a better in house chassis, has a solid reputation (Northwood), has more ground clearance, is a few thousand less and the biggest item for me is the generator option (propane). I am not aware of any other TT that has a generator. Northwood dealers are few and far between in Southern California but my research indicates that Northwood will cooperate with most RV repair places for warranty work. The extra weight of the Nash isn't an issue since I have a Ford 2012 diesel f250. I welcome any comments good or bad. We still haven't ruled out a Attitude Toy hauler either.
May-01-2013 09:45 PM