Mar-23-2017 04:41 AM
Mar-24-2017 08:15 PM
goducks10 wrote:
I want a red one. I don't care which brand.
Mar-24-2017 07:56 PM
Mar-24-2017 06:57 PM
DirtyOil wrote:
Until they remove the Human factor from these "tests", they're all mute results.
Imagine this... Fish driving the Ram in the test and T&P in the Ford and Homer Simpson in the Chev(GM)... none of them would cross the starting line! :B
Mar-24-2017 06:33 PM
RCMAN46 wrote:Wild Card wrote:RCMAN46 wrote:Wild Card wrote:
No brainer that the inline engine produces more torque. Hp is derived by the RPM the engines can spin to...again no brainer that the V engines spin faster thus produce more HP.
Lets take a look at the spes.
Ram 6.7 385 hp @ 2800 rpm
900 ft/lbs @ 1700 rpm
Ford 6.7 440 hp @ 2800 rpm
925 ft/lbs @ 1800 rpm
Duramax 445 hp @2800 rpm
910 ft/lbs @1600 rpm.
Again... Horse Power is a calculation.
Torque in ft# X RPM /5252, thats it...this is the only way to calculate Horsepower
I also dont buy those numbers above. The V8 diesels red line almost 1k RPM above the I6. Do the math yourself.
Buy the numbers or not but they are the numbers published by the respective truck manufacturers.
Take The time to look them up at the respective truck websites.
Despite popular belief the chassis dynamometer measures horsepower directly and then the computer calculates the torque curve.
Look up how a chassis dynamometer works.
Mar-24-2017 01:36 PM
06Fargo wrote:
I still like the FLT Ike run where the boys are "towing heavy" with a flatbed behind some one ton and a Volvo grocery hauler with his "I'm a slow truck" flashers on running light goes by them like they are on jackstands
Mar-24-2017 12:33 PM
Mar-24-2017 11:33 AM
Mar-24-2017 11:31 AM
RCMAN46 wrote:
This is a quote from Wikipedia on how an inertia dyno works.
Inertia Sweep: an inertia dyno system provides a fixed inertial mass flywheel and computes the power required to accelerate the flywheel (the load) from the starting to the ending RPM. The actual rotational mass of the engine (or engine and vehicle in the case of a chassis dyno) is not known, and the variability of even the mass of the tires will skew the power results. The inertia value of the flywheel is "fixed", so low-power engines are under load for a much longer time and internal engine temperatures are usually too high by the end of the test, skewing optimal "dyno" tuning settings away from the optimal tuning settings of the outside world. Conversely, high powered engines commonly complete a "4th gear sweep" test in less than 10 seconds, which is not a reliable load condition,citation needed, as compared to operation in the real world. By not providing enough time under load, internal combustion chamber temperatures are unrealistically low and power readings - especially past the power peak - are skewed to the low side.
Mar-24-2017 11:15 AM
Mar-24-2017 11:01 AM
Lessmore wrote:bguy wrote:
The road sure is a nice dyno.
I'd like to see them 3 abreast from standing start. Hold it wide open. First one to the tunnel wins. Keep all the rest of the traffic off the road
I can see that scenario going horribly wrong...ending up with three trying to get through the passageway....at the same time... when it's only big enough for two....kind of like the old Three Stooges movies. :B
Mar-24-2017 10:52 AM
bguy wrote:
The road sure is a nice dyno.
I'd like to see them 3 abreast from standing start. Hold it wide open. First one to the tunnel wins. Keep all the rest of the traffic off the road
Mar-24-2017 10:24 AM
Mar-24-2017 10:22 AM
Mar-24-2017 10:09 AM
jerem0621 wrote:
Here is the TFL video
The results are...
Thanks!
Jeremiah
Mar-24-2017 10:05 AM