โApr-25-2015 09:19 PM
โApr-27-2015 10:09 AM
rhagfo wrote:
I have found the opposite to be true, older trucks had stronger stiffer springs, new trucks have softer springs.
โApr-27-2015 08:37 AM
hbillsmith wrote:
A couple of thoughts. You will need aibags on the rear for a truck that old. They weight 35#. You can keep your hitch weight down with an Andersen Ultimate Aluminum (about 100# less than others and good for short beds). Any fiver for you will require you to be prudent on storage bin management. Use 20# propane tanks not 30# to save weight. Lastly, like said before, focus on 1/2 ton towable.
โApr-26-2015 11:09 AM
ramgunner wrote:filthy beast wrote:
I guess I am old fashioned, I like to stick with the GVWR and not just the GAWR. I also do not agree with all the "that is the same as on the ________ truck so you will be ok" statements. But that is just me. I think it is misleading to tell people those numbers on the truck don't really mean anything.
I absolutely agree.
โApr-26-2015 08:14 AM
filthy beast wrote:
I guess I am old fashioned, I like to stick with the GVWR and not just the GAWR. I also do not agree with all the "that is the same as on the ________ truck so you will be ok" statements. But that is just me. I think it is misleading to tell people those numbers on the truck don't really mean anything.
โApr-26-2015 08:09 AM
โApr-26-2015 07:59 AM
lawrosa wrote:Information from the driver door: GVWR=8800; Front GAWR= 4410; Rear GAWR=6044;
3. Measured weight from scales:
3a. Front GVWR= 3,880 Rear GVWR= 2,720 Total weighted truck @ scale=6,600.
6044 rear - 2720 scale weight = 3324 lbs. Thats your payload. Thats pin, people cargo etc...
โApr-26-2015 07:52 AM
โApr-26-2015 07:43 AM
filthy beast wrote:
I guess I am old fashioned, I like to stick with the GVWR and not just the GAWR. I also do not agree with all the "that is the same as on the ________ truck so you will be ok" statements. But that is just me. I think it is misleading to tell people those numbers on the truck don't really mean anything.
kzspree320 wrote:
Your weakest link in the RAWR is the tires at 3,000# each. I have a 2008 Ram 2500 CTD with LT 265 load range E tires and they are about 3,200# each. In round numbers, the dry weight of my fiver is 10,600#, ready to camp slightly less than 12,000#, and my CAT scaled rear axle weight is about 5,600#. I am about 600 lbs under RAWR.
I am starting out about 1,000 lbs less than you and I pack pretty light. I also question the advertised dry weight of the Mobile Suites at 11,500 lbs. I can't imagine you could be less than 13,000 lbs ready to camp.
About the only way I could see this working is if you want to spend the money to put both 19.5" wheels and tires as well as upgrade the rear suspension with air bags/springs. I think this would cost $3,000 to $4,500 depending on what you want to do. That's a lot of money to put into a 1999 truck. Do some research if you think you may be interested in upgrading from LT tires to 19.5" medium duty truck tires that can be rated at over 4,500 lbs per tire. This upgrade is pretty popular for folks with truck campers.
I would probably spend the upgrade money towards trading trucks for a 3500. Good luck on whatever you decide.
โApr-26-2015 07:29 AM
โApr-26-2015 06:52 AM
โApr-26-2015 06:37 AM
โApr-26-2015 06:18 AM
Information from the driver door: GVWR=8800; Front GAWR= 4410; Rear GAWR=6044;
3. Measured weight from scales:
3a. Front GVWR= 3,880 Rear GVWR= 2,720 Total weighted truck @ scale=6,600.
โApr-26-2015 03:34 AM
โApr-26-2015 02:48 AM