โAug-29-2015 08:47 AM
โNov-29-2015 05:47 PM
โNov-27-2015 05:50 PM
Wishin wrote:
I'm mostly skeptical of this truck with regards to payload. It weighs an awful lot but I haven't yet seen a GVWR number so I really question if a loaded up model with top 2000 lbs of payload or come anywhere's close.
โNov-27-2015 04:29 PM
thomasmnile wrote:
Saw these specs in a Detroit Free Press review of the XD published this week:
Specifications as tested
Engine: 5.0L 32-valve V8 diesel
Power: 310 hp @ 3,200 r.p.m.; 555 lb-ft of torque @ 1,600 r.p.m.
Transmission: Six-speed automatic
Wheelbase: 151.6 inches
Length: 242.9 inches
Width: 79.4 inches
Height: 78.7 inches
Curb Weight: 7,480 lbs.
Is that curb weight correct? If not mistaken it weighs more than my Ram 3500 SRW with the 5.9 under the hood.
The review stated Nissan claims a towing capacity of at least 12000 lbs. but no mention of payload capacity. Definitely need some wallet capacity to buy it. The model tested (Platinum Reserve 4x4) had a sticker of 60K.
โNov-27-2015 03:59 PM
โNov-27-2015 02:20 PM
โNov-27-2015 10:22 AM
spoon059 wrote:And, that difference is exactly my point. Those who professed the Ecodiesel DOA (i.e., worthless) forgot or ignored the fact that not everyone has the same needs and wants. After more than a year of production, and scrutiny, the Ecodiesel is far from DOA.otrfun wrote:I don't think its DOA, it just isn't what I hoped it would be. I ended up buying a Ram 2500 this summer because I needed the extra payload that my Tundra just didn't have. I think a lot of people were hoping that the Titan would offer a little better fuel mileage, a little better towing experience and a little better payload.
A year or so ago many on rv.net professed the Ecodiesel as DOA due to payload, weight, price, and various tow tests.
Deja vu?
I am sure there is a market for this vehicle, but its not as stout a vehicle as we had hoped.
There is a difference between a worthless vehicle and a vehicle that doesn't meet a specific need...
โNov-26-2015 02:06 PM
otrfun wrote:
A year or so ago many on rv.net professed the Ecodiesel as DOA due to payload, weight, price, and various tow tests.
Deja vu?
โNov-26-2015 08:25 AM
โNov-24-2015 03:22 AM
otrfun wrote:
A year or so ago many on rv.net professed the Ecodiesel as DOA due to payload, weight, price, and various tow tests.
Deja vu?
โNov-23-2015 06:35 PM
โNov-23-2015 12:58 PM
brulaz wrote:IdaD wrote:
...
I dunno - the gap between a half ton and a diesel HD truck is huge. I think there's plenty of room for a tweener like the XD to work out. Even if it isn't any faster than an Ecoboost, it still has a stouter chassis and driveline and should handle an 8-11k load better. Not like a big diesel of course, but again this thing is targeting that in-between niche.
...
Trouble is, it's not really a "tweener". In terms of payload or tow capacity, it's more like a regular F150 or Chevy half-ton, just heavier and with a diesel engine.
They spend a lot of time talking about how smooth the ride is, how much better it is than the big trucks. That also makes it sound like a regular half-ton, where you have to stiffen the suspension to properly handle max loads.
Maybe they'll come up with a HD Payload option like the F150. Stiffer suspension, heftier axles and wheels. Now that would be interesting and make it a real "tweener".
โNov-23-2015 12:23 PM
brulaz wrote:
Trouble is, it's not really a "tweener". In terms of payload or tow capacity, it's more like a regular F150 or Chevy half-ton, just heavier and with a diesel engine.
They spend a lot of time talking about how smooth the ride is, how much better it is than the big trucks. That also makes it sound like a regular half-ton, where you have to stiffen the suspension to properly handle max loads.
Maybe they'll come up with a HD Payload option like the F150. Stiffer suspension, heftier axles and wheels. Now that would be interesting and make it a real "tweener".
โNov-23-2015 07:45 AM
IdaD wrote:
...
I dunno - the gap between a half ton and a diesel HD truck is huge. I think there's plenty of room for a tweener like the XD to work out. Even if it isn't any faster than an Ecoboost, it still has a stouter chassis and driveline and should handle an 8-11k load better. Not like a big diesel of course, but again this thing is targeting that in-between niche.
...
โNov-23-2015 06:57 AM
RinconVTR wrote:FishOnOne wrote:
Here's another video of the Titan pulling 9k lb trailer. Mr. Truck didn't seam too happy with the power from this short test drive. Also the cummins sure seams to be very loud during acceleration.
Link
Yup. Something I've been saying for awhile...these smaller diesels are not the power houses for towing people think they are. People are in for a rude awakening if they buy these things for consistent towing.
Those who are seasonal RVers and want better MPG during the other 6 months of the year it might work out if you pay the price upfront and likely more maintenance cost. The high purchase price alone throws ROI out the window.
I still dont see anything but a small niche to fill here, very much like the EcoDiesel but with more realistic power.