closing of a complaints post

[54suds]

bedlam wrote:
If someone is here to lodge complaints, this is not the forum. If you are seeking resolutions, welcome. Bashing an appliance or RV manufacturer rarely ends well. I deleted the thread and hope future problems will seek solutions rather than pointing blame. If the original poster wishes to resurrect this thread seeking help, I hope the advice will not go against forum policy.

I and most people come to this forum seeking Tc specific information both positive and negative facts and fact/experience based information As I interpret your reply ,I and others may no longer expect this site to be a reasonably honest, unbiased source of information if negative information(complaints) are to be censored instead of moderated

[jplante4]

Kayteg1 wrote:

Bedlam wrote:
I hope the advice will not go against forum policy

I wonder what policy we are talking about here?
Is a copy of it available to members?

This one. In particular the professional conduct part.

Deleted
Open Roads Forum Rules & Policies
#3. "Flaming" of other participants is strictly forbidden. Professional conduct is a primary requirement for participation on the Open Roads Forum.

And you are correct. If the OP's first post was deleted, the rest of the posts in the thread would fall under the "Refers to a deleted post" category and would have likewise been deleted.

[Kayteg1]

Bedlam wrote:
I hope the advice will not go against forum policy

I wonder what policy we are talking about here?
Is a copy of it available to members?

[wnjj]

Kayteg1 wrote:
I recall long thread from the past, when upset member went back and deleted his all replies.
Since he was quoted on several occasions, that created a topic, where you could not make sense of anything. Most of forums give limited time for replies editing, but rv.net is the last forum who will work on members convenience.
They have other agendas to enforce.

I’ll quote you in case you delete yours. 😉

I wonder when the closing of a closing of a complaints post post will be?

[Kayteg1]

I recall long thread from the past, when upset member went back and deleted his all replies.
Since he was quoted on several occasions, that created a topic, where you could not make sense of anything. Most of forums give limited time for replies editing, but rv.net is the last forum who will work on members convenience.
They have other agendas to enforce.

[ScottG]

So is this the new thing?
When I'm done with a thread I just have the mods close it and no one can ever see it again? Becasue hey, I got what *I* wanted from it.
Sure makes the "Search" function useless.

[DutchmenSport]

This entire saga has been an interesting ride. Most inreresting.

[Kayteg1]

Funny how all those trolling threads stay here forever, when the 1 showing real-life situation got deleted.
Even if OP wanted his post deleted, other participants did not give the permission, did they?

[Ductape]

In my opinion that was nothing but a rant by someone with unrealistic expectations.

There’s an old saying about how you can draw more flies with honey than vinegar. There are people out there that believe they get the most service by being nasty and abrasive and demanding.

[jimh406]

You don’t have to agree, but the answer is in the other thread about closing the thread. https://forums.goodsamclub.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/29971275.cfm

That is, the OP was done with it.

[bighatnohorse]

Done and rightly so. I was surprised that it was allowed to go on for so long.

[Airdaile]

[MrPhelps]

Mr. Bedlam,

The poster WAS seeking a resolution to a very frustrating and clearly avoidable experience with RV industry participants, who were NOT customer focused. Its pretty clear that he wasn't getting what he considered even marginal customer service, so he reported it to us. He didn't even get an " I'm sorry, we are doing the best we can", which would have perhaps helped him feel a little less violated.

Most of us have experienced this treatment at one time or another and sympathize with his reaction to callous customer treatment.

Irrational, non fact based reporting of the situation, i.e. hot head bashing should not be allowed, which it appears this thread has now been conveniently categorized.

so .. I guess this new 2nd thread about the original closed thread now get closed too ... 🙂