Mar-17-2015 08:23 AM
Mar-20-2015 09:32 AM
Mar-20-2015 07:34 AM
marquette wrote:
It seems like with everything they have done to engines the manufactures still can't get past the old adage that there is no replacement for displacement....The 6.8 and 8.1 are probably overkill and use more gas but will not even be close to their potential so will be more relaxing to drive.
Mar-19-2015 09:10 AM
Mar-19-2015 08:55 AM
Mar-18-2015 07:58 PM
Mar-18-2015 10:01 AM
A 2015 2.7L Ecoboost would probably eat up the 8.1L/V10 from 10 years ago
Mar-18-2015 08:54 AM
Mar-18-2015 08:16 AM
DougE wrote:
It sure didn't take long for the "Ya gotta have a big rig" guys to jump in. The PO is looking to travel the Midwest and New England so doesn't NEED anything so stout and expensive to run.
Mar-18-2015 07:32 AM
MFL wrote:NC Hauler wrote:dodge guy wrote:
Any of the current 1/2 tons is more than you need. a 5th wheel the size you are thinking has a small frontal area. any o the V-8`s will do just fine.
If you want a 3/4 ton, I`de go with the Ford with the V-10 or the Dodge with the 5.9 or 5.7L. Chevy with the 6.0L is the only choice.
Actually for the years OP is talking, 1998 to 2004', as far as Chevy/GM goes, the 6.0 isn't the only choice...as stated, 5.7 and the 8.1 were available during those years...Having towed the same 5er through the mountains with a 2003 6.0 and the 2001 8.1....though the 8.1 is a gas guzzler, the 6.0 couldn't compete with the 8.1 strapped to an Allison....the 8.1 was the only gasser back then put out by GM/Chevy that came with the Allison, (other than the Duramax), to me that's a BIG plus , ( of course mpg was a big minus).
Jim, I think the GM 5.7 was left out as an option, due to the low torque/low HP. It is dependable, like the Ford 2v 5.4, but down on towing power.
Jerry
Mar-18-2015 07:31 AM
DougE wrote:
It sure didn't take long for the "Ya gotta have a big rig" guys to jump in. The PO is looking to travel the Midwest and New England so doesn't NEED anything so stout and expensive to run.
Mar-18-2015 07:27 AM
Bionic Man wrote:NC Hauler wrote:Bionic Man wrote:
Since no one has touched on the Dodge, I will. If looking that way, I would try to find the V10 - it will pull every bit as hard as the Chevy 8.1 or the Ford V10.
I had a 5.9 in a short bed regular cab 1500, about a 1995 vintage. Was a good truck, and did fine pulling a 4400 pound boat, but that is a lot easier to pull than a 5er. I think the 5.9 would be comparable to the Chevy 5.7, or the Ford 5.4, but is limited to around 230 HP (memory, could be a little higher).
Long story short, go with the V10 or find a little newer 5.7 Hemi. Much better towing options.
Wasn't trying to cut on any one vehicle...I don't know about the Ford V10 nor the Dodge V10..I merely brought up the 8.1 from owning one and it hadn't been mentioned up to that point. What were the specs on the Dodge V10 engine...just curious..
310/450
Horsepower sure has changed in modern engines.
Mar-18-2015 07:03 AM
Mar-18-2015 06:11 AM
Mar-18-2015 05:12 AM
NC Hauler wrote:Bionic Man wrote:
Since no one has touched on the Dodge, I will. If looking that way, I would try to find the V10 - it will pull every bit as hard as the Chevy 8.1 or the Ford V10.
I had a 5.9 in a short bed regular cab 1500, about a 1995 vintage. Was a good truck, and did fine pulling a 4400 pound boat, but that is a lot easier to pull than a 5er. I think the 5.9 would be comparable to the Chevy 5.7, or the Ford 5.4, but is limited to around 230 HP (memory, could be a little higher).
Long story short, go with the V10 or find a little newer 5.7 Hemi. Much better towing options.
Wasn't trying to cut on any one vehicle...I don't know about the Ford V10 nor the Dodge V10..I merely brought up the 8.1 from owning one and it hadn't been mentioned up to that point. What were the specs on the Dodge V10 engine...just curious..