โMar-25-2015 09:52 AM
โMar-28-2015 05:39 PM
wilber1 wrote:
I would never run my truck or any of my other vehicles at WOT up a long grade or just about any other time for that matter, so what it will do at WOT doesn't mean much to me. I don't believe in abusing the machinery just to get up a hill a minute or two faster.
โMar-28-2015 05:17 PM
โMar-28-2015 02:20 PM
โMar-28-2015 02:11 PM
ShinerBock wrote:
"The only place where the trucks showed any sign of weakness was climbing the nearly 7 percent final grade on the push to 5,000 feet of elevation. With the accelerator stapled to the floor, the truckโs speed dropped off to 53 mph, and engine temperature climbed to an almost alarming 244 degrees. Thankfully, as we crested the summit, the engine temperature returned to normal and we never experienced any other engine temperature issues during the remainder of the test."
โMar-28-2015 10:04 AM
โMar-28-2015 10:02 AM
bguy wrote:
41.8% better fuel mileage towing at WOT. I think Ram hit the nail right on the head and fired it home all in one shot!
โMar-28-2015 09:50 AM
โMar-28-2015 08:40 AM
โMar-28-2015 08:34 AM
โMar-28-2015 08:19 AM
โMar-28-2015 08:17 AM
โMar-27-2015 06:42 PM
โMar-27-2015 06:29 PM
Bionic Man wrote:
So, for the record, the speed limit on that stretch of road is 60 MPH, not 65.
Bionic Man wrote:
Here, the truck that can maintain the posted maximum allowed speed with it's rated capacity virtually every where else is vilified because it is 10 MPH under the speed limit (maximum allowed legal speed) on a short, extreme tretch of road.
โMar-27-2015 06:29 PM
โMar-27-2015 06:09 PM
nomad297 wrote:
Here's the lowdown.
Bruce