โDec-10-2015 04:59 AM
โDec-16-2015 02:47 PM
pjberny5 wrote:
Deciding if I should purchase a 2WD or 4WD SWR 3500 but need a little advice from those of you who have a 2WD or have had both. Total 5th wheel weight loaded is around 13,500 so do not need a dually and the SWR fits in my garage The other factor is the price. Can buy a 2WD this time of year for 5-6 thousand less than a 4WD.
โDec-14-2015 07:53 AM
laknox wrote:
HAH! You've never been =truly= stuck until you've stuck a 4wd TRACTOR! :B
Lyle
โDec-14-2015 07:49 AM
โDec-14-2015 07:45 AM
jerem0621 wrote:I was proud of my ability to get to the hunting grounds, camping spots, trail heads and so on with my 2 wheel drive station wagon, too! We had a Chevy Estate Wagon and went all over the wilderness area known as The Flat Top wilderness area in north west Colorado. We helped our niece get her Pinto into the furthest campground on the edge of the wilderness...
Use to take 4x2 1978 F100 short bed hunting all the time. We hunted in a pine tree forest used by a paper factory. Had lots of logging trails. Never...ever...got stuck.. But we were not stupid about where we went either.
I have had many 4x4's and realized that I never needed the 4x4. Hunted off road in my 2007 Ford Focus for a while... took my wifes Sebring convertible hunting... Also took my Pontiac Firebird. Of course, I am careful where I go and if the roads/trails are too rough or muddy I park and hike in. Feet work great.
Last two trucks have been 2wd and will probably not own another 4x4 pickup.
Good AT tires, sensible driving, common sense goes a long way to not being stuck.
It all comes down to personal choice... Very personal choice.
Thanks!
Jeremiah
โDec-14-2015 06:52 AM
โDec-13-2015 09:46 PM
โDec-13-2015 08:17 PM
โDec-13-2015 01:57 PM
caysea7254 wrote:I was at a rally a few years ago and almost every one who was parked on the grass had to be pulled out. MH, 2wd's,4wd's. All stuck in mud. Only time I have been stuck with my 2wd.
ok I asked this same Question last year. We ended up with a 3500HD Silverado 4W. Glad we got it cause we got stuck in our campsite in the mud. Thank goodness for 4WD.
โDec-13-2015 10:40 AM
โDec-12-2015 05:33 PM
โDec-12-2015 04:16 PM
Coach-man wrote:shum02 wrote:Coach-man wrote:
Depending on where you drive/camp some need 4x4, a lot of folks need to justify buying a 4x4! One disadvantage, in addition to lower mill age, and higher upfront cost is weight, which will take away from what you can haul!
A few hundred pounds of CCC and fuel mileage cost you can't count. I can drop 500lbs in the bed of the truck and not notice ANY change in fuel mileage, gasser or diesel.
Only issue I've had with it was the transfer case shift motor($150) and a few bucks worth of synthetic Mercon ever few years.
Hmm? Just the response I expected, if this were a 2500 vs 3500 weight question, the weight police would be asking how many additional coats you are packing to make sure you do not go over the CCC, or GVCWR, or anything like that! Now I am supposed to believe that a transfer case and front axel with all the trimmings of a 4X4 only weigh 100#??
โDec-12-2015 01:28 PM
Coach-man wrote:shum02 wrote:Coach-man wrote:
Depending on where you drive/camp some need 4x4, a lot of folks need to justify buying a 4x4! One disadvantage, in addition to lower mill age, and higher upfront cost is weight, which will take away from what you can haul!
A few hundred pounds of CCC and fuel mileage cost you can't count. I can drop 500lbs in the bed of the truck and not notice ANY change in fuel mileage, gasser or diesel.
Only issue I've had with it was the transfer case shift motor($150) and a few bucks worth of synthetic Mercon ever few years.
Hmm? Just the response I expected, if this were a 2500 vs 3500 weight question, the weight police would be asking how many additional coats you are packing to make sure you do not go over the CCC, or GVCWR, or anything like that! Now I am supposed to believe that a transfer case and front axel with all the trimmings of a 4X4 only weigh 100#??
โDec-12-2015 09:15 AM
downtheroad wrote:
Can't imagine buying a 350/3500 truck with 2 wheel drive.
Probably the good price is a reflection of the fact that no one wants one and they can't get rid of it.
..and then there is the re-sale factor to consider. Good luck with that.
โDec-11-2015 08:22 PM
Veebyes wrote:
The whole thread reminds me of this one seen in Chicken, Alaska. Not many trees to get a winch line on up there but there is plenty of mud.
If this works for boats, why not vehicles.
โDec-11-2015 07:59 PM
PRodacy wrote:laknox wrote:Veebyes wrote:
The whole thread reminds me of this one seen in Chicken, Alaska. Not many trees to get a winch line on up there but there is plenty of mud.
If this works for boats, why not vehicles.
My h.s. physics teacher didn't have much use for winches. He carried an old truck axle, a sledge hammer and about 100' of cable in 2 50' lengths. He'd hammer in the axle, attach the cable to truck and pin (or tree), then simply grab the cable in the middle and lift it or walk sideways. That's a =lot= of leverage! Just keep doing it until unstuck. Of course, his main point was "don't drive in places where you =could= get stuck". ๐
Lyle
Lyle, your physics teacher was testing you, and obviously you failed. Pulling sideways on that cable provides less force than pulling straight in-line with the cable. Simple vector analysis. If you think there's any way one person pulling in any direction could beat a winch (about 12,000 pounds, or 24,000 pounds with a snatch block) I've got some great beachfront property in Kansas that I'll sell to you. Anchors to get stuck vehicles out when no trees are within reach of the winch are readily available and used by many off-readers.